Hello!
Thanks for your help.
Bouche Paul wrote:
Is the wsdl correct?
I think so. I'm attaching it at the end of the e-mail in case you want
to see it.
Regards,
Antonio.
I remember seeing the problem and its discussion before on this list. You might want to search the archives at
Hello!
Thanks for your help.
Bouche Paul wrote:
Is the wsdl correct?
I think so. I'm attaching it at the end of the e-mail in case you want
to see it.
Regards,
Antonio.
I remember seeing the problem and its discussion before on this list. You might want to search the archives at
Is the wsdl correct?
I remember seeing the problem and its discussion before on this list. You
might want to search the archives at the list. I just did that and check this
out http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/AXIS-1331.
-- Paul
> -Original Message-
> From: Antonio Ruiz Martínez [
Hi Steve-
thanks for the prompt response! that clears it up.
false alarm - no bug. :)
-c
On Thu, Mar 11, 2004 at 06:35:51PM +0100, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> Hi
>
> If you use the same name in both the Request and Response message then it is
> translated as an IN/OUT parameter. As such a
Hi
If you use the same name in both the Request and Response message then it is
translated as an IN/OUT parameter. As such a holder class will automatically be
used and substituted. If this is not what you want i.e. you want the method to
return a string then call the foo in the Response somthi
This is not a bug. This is a manifestation of an inout parameter as
described by JAX-RPC. Consider what you have: an input path, an input
newObject, and output path. Since path is both an input and an output
parameter, it becomes an inout parameter and the full signature of
addFolder is
p
