03 3:47
PM
Subject: RE: WSDL SchemaDTD
Richard and Girish,
Thanks lads. I was getting ahead of myself I think. I was looking at WSDL1.2
indeed Girish. Thanks for setting me straight.
Richard, thanks for the URL. I've a nasty habit of thinking that
starting to develop support for it.
Anne
- Original Message -
From:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, August 08, 2003 4:23
PM
Subject: RE: WSDL SchemaDTD
Thanks for clearing that up Anne.
What's the story with Axis and implementin
m for some reason. Bit of practice will
hopefully sort me out.
Thanks
again folks
Mark.
-Original Message-From: Hansen, Richard
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: 08 August 2003
20:24To: '[EMAIL PROTECTED]'Subject: RE: WSDL
SchemaDTD
http://schemas.xmlsoap.org/wsdl/
rcumstance the
wsdl namespace URI doesin fact point to the WSDL schema.
In WSDL 1.1, one portType cannot extend another
portType.
Regards,
Anne
- Original Message -
From:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, August 08, 2003 3:47
PM
Subject: RE: WSDL
Title: Message
Are
you referring to WSDL 1.1 or WSDL 1.2
-Original Message-From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]Sent: Friday, August 08, 2003 3:38
PMTo: [EMAIL PROTECTED];
[EMAIL PROTECTED]Subject: WSDL SchemaDTD
Hi
folks,
Is there a WSDL
Title: Message
http://schemas.xmlsoap.org/wsdl/
-Original Message-From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]Sent: Friday, August 08, 2003 2:38
PMTo: [EMAIL PROTECTED];
[EMAIL PROTECTED]Subject: WSDL SchemaDTD
Hi
folks,
Is there a WSDL schema or
Title: Message
Hi
folks,
Is there a WSDL schema or DTD available does anyone know? I'm just having a
quick look at the wsdl spec here and instead of 'portType' they have
'interface'. This is interesting as they mention that intances of the interface
element may extend other in
