[EMAIL PROTECTED](B
(B[EMAIL PROTECTED]'%9%H$r$*Aw$j$7$^$9!#(B
(B
$B"#"#"#"#"#"#"#"#"#"#"#"#"#"#"#"#"#"#"#"#"#"#"#"#"#"#"#"#"#"#(B
$B!Z%-!<%o!<%I![(B
(B $B%;%C%7%g%s(B, $B>uBV(B, $B%9%F!<%H(B
$B!ZF|IU![(B
(B 2004/12/22-2004/12/24
$B!Z%9%l%C%I![(B
(B http://marc.theaimsgroup.c
> -Original Message-
> From: ANDREW MICONE [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Thursday, December 23, 2004 5:43 PM
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: RE: Web Service with state
>
> Many web services also use some kind of transaction id passed
> around at the a
cture in any of these and it just doesn't
> look natural.
>
> Jai
>
>
>
> -Original Message-
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Thursday, December 23, 2004 5:50 AM
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: RE: Web Service with s
te > does not come into the picture in any of these and it
just doesn't > look natural. >
> Jai > >
> > -Original Message-> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Thursday, December 23, 2004 5:50
AM> To: [EMAIL PROT
and it just doesn't
> look natural.
>
> Jai
>
>
>
> -Original Message-
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Thursday, December 23, 2004 5:50 AM
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: RE: Web Service with state
>
> Each web
ient state does not come into the picture in any
of these and it just doesn't look natural.
Jai
-Original Message-From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]Sent: Thursday, December 23, 2004 5:50
AMTo: [EMAIL PROTECTED]Subject: RE: Web Service with
state
Each web se
> > which could be accessed
> > by any SLSB instance within the same JVM. Works for
> > EJB way (SLSB) and
> > JAX-RPC way.
> >
> > cu
> > Merten
> >
> >
> > ____________
eter Smith
> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Thursday, December 23, 2004 5:11 AM
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: Re: Web Service with state
>
>
>
>
>
> Have read that web service has to
TED]Subject: Re: Web
Service with state
Have read that web service has to be state-less. Why is that?
Where did you read that?
Maybe it's a hint which should be followed if possible, but nothing more
IMHO.
From J2EE1.4
web services point of view this is not a "hint&q
Have read that web service has to be state-less. Why is that?
Where did you read that?
Maybe it's a hint which should be followed if possible, but nothing more
IMHO.
>From J2EE1.4 web services point of view this is not a "hint" at all
See "Web Services for J2EE, Ve
Hello fellows
Thanks for all answers!
Im deploy my web service in the scope "application". Then I gets only one
"Service-object", that is shared between all calls. Then the Service-object
can keep the data. (Maybe this works for you too, Merten?).
I can't put the state in the legacy program unl
> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]An:
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> .com>
> Kopie:
>
> Thema:Web Service with state
>
Hi Kalle,
> -Original Message-
> From: Nice To Know [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Wednesday, December 22, 2004 11:04 AM
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: Web Service with state
>
> Hi!
> I'm building a web service that need a internal state. This
;Kopie:
Thema:Web Service with state
22.12.2004 11:03
Bitte antworten
ons and does so within the
context of established Web services standards.
---
Cheers,
Tom
-Original Message-
From: Nice To Know [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: 22 December 2004 10:04
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Web Service with state
Hi!
I'm building a web service that need a int
Hi!
I'm building a web service that need a internal state. This is needed
because the web service will start a legacy program that takes input from a
prompt. This is my calls:
int threadId : runProg( String args )
void sendInput( threadId, String args)
String getResult( threadId)
Have read that
16 matches
Mail list logo
