Hi,
On Dienstag 06 Januar 2009, Alexander Morlang wrote:
> Axel Neumann schrieb:
> > We wanted batmand (and especially its core routing algorithm) to be
> > decentral and simple. So no central point of control/failure and
> > therefore also no HNA server. Of course there are many potential attack
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Axel Neumann schrieb:
> HI,
>
> I like brainstorming like this.
> We wanted batmand (and especially its core routing algorithm) to be decentral
> and simple. So no central point of control/failure and therefore also no HNA
> server. Of course there
Hi again,
is there a way to set a TTL value for each hna that is different from OGM TTL?
If I assume that an HNA internet host is reachable via two nodes (e.g. running
icvpn - bgp)
batmand currently ignores one of this hna and also the node and its traffic
(right?).
What if we use the ttl valu
Hi,
> I like brainstorming like this.
me too.
> We wanted batmand (and especially its core routing algorithm) to be decentral
> and simple. So no central point of control/failure and therefore also no HNA
> server.
Perhaps there is a different solution. What if everybody may broadcast their HNA
l
HI,
I like brainstorming like this.
We wanted batmand (and especially its core routing algorithm) to be decentral
and simple. So no central point of control/failure and therefore also no HNA
server. Of course there are many potential attack vectors in a community mesh
and probably there will al
