Re: [B.A.T.M.A.N.] Mesh speed comparison between Atheros and MediaTek

2016-07-15 Thread Sven Eckelmann
On Freitag, 15. Juli 2016 21:41:53 CEST Dirk van der Walt wrote: > Hi list, > > This is not strictly a Batman question, but I figured that it would be > a good place to ask. Is this device only using rt2x00? Then a good place to ask would be linux- wirel...@vger.kernel.org + Stanislaw Gruszka , H

[B.A.T.M.A.N.] Mesh speed comparison between Atheros and MediaTek

2016-07-15 Thread Dirk van der Walt
Hi list, This is not strictly a Batman question, but I figured that it would be a good place to ask. I've always in the past used Atheros based hardware for the mesh nodes and the results have been stable and with acceptable speeds. Recently in my search for cheap and open hardware I got a few M

Re: [B.A.T.M.A.N.] mesh losing internal Ilayer3 connectivity

2016-05-20 Thread Antonio Quartulli
On Fri, May 20, 2016 at 09:23:24AM +0200, Sven Eckelmann wrote: > On Thursday 19 May 2016 14:22:58 Nick Schaf wrote: > > I've run into what sounds like a similar problem, but dove in and found more > > details. Here's the setup: > > > > -19 nodes running BATMAN-adv 2014.14.0 on OpenWrt Chaos Calm

Re: [B.A.T.M.A.N.] mesh losing internal Ilayer3 connectivity

2016-05-20 Thread Sven Eckelmann
On Thursday 19 May 2016 14:22:58 Nick Schaf wrote: > I've run into what sounds like a similar problem, but dove in and found more > details. Here's the setup: > > -19 nodes running BATMAN-adv 2014.14.0 on OpenWrt Chaos Calmer; various > hardware (D-Link, BBB, Open-Mesh, WRTnode, TP-Link). Only s

Re: [B.A.T.M.A.N.] mesh losing internal Ilayer3 connectivity

2016-05-19 Thread Nick Schaf
ehalf Of Sven Eckelmann Sent: Monday, May 02, 2016 9:55 AM To: b.a.t.m.a.n@lists.open-mesh.org Subject: Re: [B.A.T.M.A.N.] mesh losing internal Ilayer3 connectivity On Monday 02 May 2016 21:57:49 Karl Auer wrote: > My apologies up front for a newbie question in this apparently very > tec

Re: [B.A.T.M.A.N.] mesh losing internal Ilayer3 connectivity

2016-05-02 Thread Sven Eckelmann
On Monday 02 May 2016 21:57:49 Karl Auer wrote: > My apologies up front for a newbie question in this apparently very > technical list. If there is a more appropriate list or forum please > direct me to it. > > I'm running batman-adv (Chaos Calmer, r47065) on OpenWRT on the GL > -AR150 platform.

[B.A.T.M.A.N.] mesh losing internal Ilayer3 connectivity

2016-05-02 Thread Karl Auer
My apologies up front for a newbie question in this apparently very technical list. If there is a more appropriate list or forum please direct me to it. I'm running batman-adv (Chaos Calmer, r47065) on OpenWRT on the GL -AR150 platform. It all works swimmingly, except that sometimes, for no appare

Re: [B.A.T.M.A.N.] Mesh hickups with 2014.3

2015-06-14 Thread Bjoern Franke
Hi, > > Okay. In Gluon both the batman-adv multicast optimizations and > bridge multicast snooping are deactivated by default. So I think > it's probably an issue with the bridge on your gateway. Does > deactivating the batman-adv and bridge multicast stuff make a > difference? Unfortunately not

Re: [B.A.T.M.A.N.] Mesh hickups with 2014.3

2015-06-12 Thread Hans-Werner Hilse
Hi, Am 2015-06-12 17:20, schrieb Bjoern Franke: > Public-IPv6 is announced from a gateway via radvd into the mesh. So even in that direction, NDP is fine. Seems only ICMPv6 echo requests are somewhat different then? ip -6 neigh show says "FAILED". My bad: I planned to write "RA" instead of

Re: [B.A.T.M.A.N.] Mesh hickups with 2014.3

2015-06-12 Thread Linus Lüssing
On Fri, Jun 12, 2015 at 05:04:48PM +0200, Bjoern Franke wrote: > Hi Linus, > > > There's a hash_max value for the bridge > > (/sys/class/net//bridge/hash_max). By default it's rather > > small, just 512 entries / multicast listeners, so it's expected that > > with 500 nodes the bridge multicast sn

Re: [B.A.T.M.A.N.] Mesh hickups with 2014.3

2015-06-12 Thread Bjoern Franke
Hi hwh, > Continuously? So that directions seems fine then. Yep. > What does "not possible" mean? There's no reply? No reply, yes. > So it's just the gateway that can't reach the "router"? Correct. > > Public-IPv6 is announced from a gateway via radvd into the mesh. > > So even in

Re: [B.A.T.M.A.N.] Mesh hickups with 2014.3

2015-06-11 Thread Linus Lüssing
On Thu, Jun 11, 2015 at 04:44:14PM +0200, Bjoern Franke wrote: > Hi Marek, > > > > Do you have the multicast optimizations enabled ? 2014.3.0 still has > > a known > > bug causing these optimizations to harm multicast traffic. Either > > disable this > > feature or upgrade to something newer

Re: [B.A.T.M.A.N.] Mesh hickups with 2014.3

2015-06-11 Thread Marek Lindner
On Thursday, June 11, 2015 16:44:14 Bjoern Franke wrote: > Thanks for your reply. Multicast optimizations are disabled, but we ha > ve multicast related errors in the logs: > br-mesh: Multicast hash table chain limit reached: bat0br-mesh: Cannot > rehash multicast hash table, disabling snooping: ba

Re: [B.A.T.M.A.N.] Mesh hickups with 2014.3

2015-06-11 Thread Bjoern Franke
Hi Marek, > Do you have the multicast optimizations enabled ? 2014.3.0 still has > a known > bug causing these optimizations to harm multicast traffic. Either > disable this > feature or upgrade to something newer than 2014.3.0. > IThanks for your reply. Multicast optimizations are disabled

Re: [B.A.T.M.A.N.] Mesh hickups with 2014.3

2015-06-11 Thread Marek Lindner
On Thursday, June 11, 2015 14:19:23 Bjoern Franke wrote: > - ping via linklocal, ULA and public-IPv6 from gateway to router not > possible > - other routers in the same mesh can ping it via ULA etc (connected via > the same fastd-VPN) > > Public-IPv6 is announced from a gateway via radvd into the

Re: [B.A.T.M.A.N.] Mesh hickups with 2014.3

2015-06-11 Thread Hans-Werner Hilse
Hi, Am 2015-06-11 14:19, schrieb Bjoern Franke: - gateway gets alfreddata from router Continuously? So that directions seems fine then. - router pingable via batctl - ping via linklocal, ULA and public-IPv6 from gateway to router not possible What does "not possible" mean? There's no repl

[B.A.T.M.A.N.] Mesh hickups with 2014.3

2015-06-11 Thread Bjoern Franke
Hi, in the last days we upgraded nearly all (~500) routers of our Freifunk -mesh from 2013.4 to 2014.3. The most things run fine again, but with some routers we have connectivity issues as follows: - gateway gets alfreddata from router - router pingable via batctl - ping via linklocal, ULA and pu

[B.A.T.M.A.N.] Mesh network splits when a single node goes down

2014-04-19 Thread Saurabh Chakrabarti
We have a mesh network running on an adhoc wifi network. All the nodes are in static position. The problem is that when one node goes down, the mesh breaks and the bat0 interfaces of the nodes are not reachable (although, strangely, the nodes are reachable via the wlan0 interfaces). Also, the n

Re: [B.A.T.M.A.N.] mesh: received packet with own address as source address

2012-02-24 Thread Marek Lindner
On Monday, February 20, 2012 18:41:17 Gioacchino Mazzurco wrote: > But I think that in my case the problem was triggered by the fact that > the two nodes has different batman-adv version one 2012.0.0 and the > other 2011.4.0 ( and i supposed that the two version have incompatible > loop avoidance )

Re: [B.A.T.M.A.N.] mesh: received packet with own address as source address

2012-02-20 Thread Gioacchino Mazzurco
Maybe related to the problem we had in Mistretta! We upgraded just ONE node and it seems that bridge loop avoidance didn't worked anymore that node was attached to another node via lan and both nodes had bat0 and eth0 bridged, the 2 nodes started flooding the network with rebroadcasted broadcast

Re: [B.A.T.M.A.N.] mesh: received packet with own address as source address

2012-02-19 Thread Sven Eckelmann
On Monday 20 February 2012 00:45:01 Filippo Sallemi wrote: > Hi all, > after upgrade of batman package on my nodes I see a very decerase of > performance of my mesh network. When I connect to some node i see > every time this message: > > mesh: received packet with own address as source address

[B.A.T.M.A.N.] mesh: received packet with own address as source address

2012-02-19 Thread Filippo Sallemi
Hi all, after upgrade of batman package on my nodes I see a very decerase of performance of my mesh network. When I connect to some node i see every time this message: mesh: received packet with own address as source address now in a gateway mode my network config is: config 'interface' 'lan'

Re: [B.A.T.M.A.N.] mesh

2011-05-06 Thread Jose Armando
Sven now i feel really stupid with all the question did u ask me i would love to used open-mesh.com Why don't you use already existing solutions? well there is not mesh firmware that can work on my ubiquity routers i used this router ubnt.com can u build for me the firmware ? On Fri, May 6, 2011

Re: [B.A.T.M.A.N.] mesh

2011-05-06 Thread Sven Eckelmann
On Friday 06 May 2011 19:58:46 Sebastián D. Criado wrote: > El 06/05/11 14:39, Sven Eckelmann escribió: > > On Friday 06 May 2011 19:21:58 Jose Armando wrote: > >> Sorry seven here's is what looking for I would like to build a firmware > >> that work like mesh and I been told that Batman is the bes

Re: [B.A.T.M.A.N.] mesh

2011-05-06 Thread Sven Eckelmann
On Friday 06 May 2011 19:31:33 Jose Armando wrote: > Sven are u in usa? Not right now and propably not in the near future. Kind regards, Sven signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part.

Re: [B.A.T.M.A.N.] mesh

2011-05-06 Thread Sven Eckelmann
On Friday 06 May 2011 19:21:58 Jose Armando wrote: > Sorry seven here's is what looking for I would like to build a firmware > that work like mesh and I been told that Batman is the best I'm new one > this linux open source but I want to learn and I want to build mesh > firmware that work with this

Re: [B.A.T.M.A.N.] mesh

2011-05-06 Thread Sven Eckelmann
On Friday 06 May 2011 19:02:48 Jose Armando wrote: > Question so openwrt do not work with Batman? U saying I need to creater > package for my router? Diego to much Question but I'm need I was think just > install openwrt on the router u can install any package ? You still didn't answer what you wa

Re: [B.A.T.M.A.N.] mesh

2011-05-06 Thread Sven Eckelmann
On Friday 06 May 2011 18:11:21 Jose Armando wrote: > Hello Sven > > Thank you so much for u info i will play with it > Note > Question if for one reason i cant make work can u help to install for > me i can open telnet on my router and u can do for me i will pay you > for u time and i will be grea

Re: [B.A.T.M.A.N.] mesh

2011-05-06 Thread Sven Eckelmann
On Friday 06 May 2011 16:23:43 Jose Armando wrote: > Hello > > Can any one tell me how to install batman on openwrt my router has > openwrt install with luci but i cant install batman im need on this > mesh or any one can build for me and i will pay for u time > thank you batmand or batman-adv or

[B.A.T.M.A.N.] mesh

2011-05-06 Thread Jose Armando
Hello Can any one tell me how to install batman on openwrt my router has openwrt install with luci but i cant install batman im need on this mesh or any one can build for me and i will pay for u time thank you Armando  Dieguez Phone 714.292.0156

Re: [B.A.T.M.A.N.] Mesh network topology problem

2011-01-05 Thread Linus Lüssing
Hi Michael, Welcome to the BATMAN mailing list :). Let me ask some general questions first about what you're trying to achieve. So you are trying to set up a highly fault tolearant network. Does the fault tolerant setup have any time limitations, how quickly do you need to detect outageous and swi

Re: [B.A.T.M.A.N.] Mesh with access from wifi and lan. Which is the Only True Way?

2010-09-30 Thread Marek Lindner
On Thursday 30 September 2010 13:50:52 Magosányi Árpád wrote: > I do announce local wifi net through HNA. > In the meantime my config started to not work. I saw that the node in > the middle does REJECT tunnel traffic from packet filter, so added a > firewall rule to accept everything in the FORW

Re: [B.A.T.M.A.N.] Mesh with access from wifi and lan. Which is the Only True Way?

2010-09-30 Thread Magosányi Árpád
On 2010-09-29 23:40, Marek Lindner wrote: On Wednesday 29 September 2010 22:44:36 Magosányi Árpád wrote: I am using OpenWrt Backfire. Ok. One sign that I am using nonstandard setting is that a non-batman node will end up in a throw route of the batman nodes. But if it should work without fi

Re: [B.A.T.M.A.N.] Mesh with access from wifi and lan. Which is the Only True Way?

2010-09-29 Thread Marek Lindner
On Wednesday 29 September 2010 22:44:36 Magosányi Árpád wrote: > I am using OpenWrt Backfire. Ok. > One sign that I am using nonstandard setting is that a non-batman node > will end up in a throw route of the batman nodes. But if it should work > without firewall, then I will be happy with my cu

Re: [B.A.T.M.A.N.] Mesh with access from wifi and lan. Which is the Only True Way?

2010-09-29 Thread Magosányi Árpád
On 2010-09-29 22:20, Marek Lindner wrote: Normally, you don't any specific rules to make it work - it works as-is out of the box unless your system configures a firewall. If you tell your system to disable the firewall entirely everything will work. What distribution are you using ? OpenWRT ?

Re: [B.A.T.M.A.N.] Mesh with access from wifi and lan. Which is the Only True Way?

2010-09-29 Thread Marek Lindner
On Wednesday 29 September 2010 21:41:29 Magosányi Árpád wrote: > I actually want to enable traffic. Any traffic from any node in the mesh. > Regarding packet storm: I thought that the reject in the default > iptables config might be there to stop propagation of some packets which > would otherwis

Re: [B.A.T.M.A.N.] Mesh with access from wifi and lan. Which is the Only True Way?

2010-09-29 Thread Magosányi Árpád
On 2010-09-29 12:28, Marek Lindner wrote: On Tuesday 28 September 2010 21:08:53 Magosányi Árpád wrote: But with three nodes in a linear topology user-A-B-C, the reject firewall chain (basically the FORWARD chain) eats up the packets user->A This is the same rule which rejects batman packets A->

Re: [B.A.T.M.A.N.] Mesh with access from wifi and lan. Which is the Only True Way?

2010-09-29 Thread Marek Lindner
On Tuesday 28 September 2010 21:08:53 Magosányi Árpád wrote: > But with three nodes in a linear topology user-A-B-C, the reject > firewall chain (basically the FORWARD chain) eats up the packets user->A > This is the same rule which rejects batman packets A->C which go through > B, and there are

[B.A.T.M.A.N.] Mesh with access from wifi and lan. Which is the Only True Way?

2010-09-28 Thread Magosányi Árpád
Hi! I am struggling with setting up a mesh network. It should be available for users without batmand both on the lan interfaces and wan interfaces. Surely I do have some misconceptions in my setup, but don't know where. The nodes are wistron ca8 ones, with official OpenWrt Backfire 10.03.1-r

Re: [B.A.T.M.A.N.] Mesh network advice

2009-12-19 Thread Marek Lindner
Hey, >This whole feature stuff is still confusing to me. > >I wondering how to make it more obvious to mere users? could you be a bit more specific ? What exactly is not obvious ? We always try our best to keep our stuff as simple as possible. :) >Also, I am into wireless connec

Re: [B.A.T.M.A.N.] Mesh network advice

2009-12-19 Thread RHS Linux User
Hi Marek and all, This whole feature stuff is still confusing to me. I wondering how to make it more obvious to mere users? Also, I am into wireless connected sensor systems, so it would be nice if each node had a provision to address multiple local sensors which might be connected VIA

Re: [B.A.T.M.A.N.] Mesh network advice

2009-12-19 Thread Marek Lindner
Hi, > I would like to hear your thoughts / advice on batman vs batman-advanced. I > read the wiki entry on the pros and cons of batman-adv but I am still in > doubt about which one to use. For instance, batman-adv doesnt have gateway > support, but it has ipv6 which if I understand correctly can

[B.A.T.M.A.N.] Mesh network advice

2009-12-18 Thread Rudolf Meijering
Hi, Im setting up a small mesh network of maximum 20 nodes. The network will mainly be used for sharing internet access but also perhaps for gaming and file sharing. Access will be controlled via RADIUS and a portal page. I would like to hear your thoughts / advice on batman vs batman-advanced. I