Re: [backstage] 3D?

2005-08-11 Thread Peter Gordon
@lists.bbc.co.uk Sent: Thursday, August 11, 2005 9:13 AM Subject: Re: [backstage] 3D? On Wed, 10 Aug 2005, Tim Scollick wrote: Big sites with lots of content will continue to use html but the marketing dollars will continue to gravitate to Flash. Which to my mind is a real plus point for Flash

Re: [backstage] 3D?

2005-08-11 Thread Brit
Tim Scollick wrote: Dell, Coke, Nike, Microsoft, GM, Ford, VW, Toyota, Nissan, Adidas... Indeed. We do VW - www.newgolfgti.co.uk being the latest. Try doing that in HTML. No, I'm not a Flash developer, but I am appreciative of what it can do and when it should be deployed. Flash can't do

Re: [backstage] 3D?

2005-08-11 Thread Dave Cross
On Thu, Aug 11, 2005 at 04:30:05PM +0100, Richard Lockwood wrote: My point however that what you and J.P. describe as chaff is neccessary for the evolution and development of the web still holds. Someone has to pay for all this wonderful free content - if you can come up with a better

Re: [backstage] 3D?

2005-08-11 Thread Chris Walker
Richard Lockwood wrote: Sorry Stefan, but I've read a lot of Neilsen over the years, and he still manages to frequently annoy me. Neilsen's alertbox and so on make interesting reading occasionally, but his updates rarely marry nicely with anything in the real world. The key of course,

Re: [backstage] 3D?

2005-08-11 Thread Tim Scollick
Well i am web technology journalist Oh! Now it's all starting to make sense. This does conflict with DRM quite heavily in that its impossible to hide your data sources . I didn't say anything about DRM. You're right. It can always be hacked. Advertisers like to *give* video and audio

Re: [backstage] 3D?

2005-08-11 Thread Matthew Somerville
Brit wrote: We do VW - www.newgolfgti.co.uk being the latest. Try doing that in HTML. I don't have a problem with Flash if used appropriately [1], but I do have a problem with my Flash-disabled browser being redirected to the experienceFlashYes.html page (which is then a plain black page,

Re: [backstage] 3D?

2005-08-11 Thread Graeme Mulvaney
or alternatively http://www.weebl.jolt.co.uk/--- although most of it would be a piece of pie to do in dHTML ;) On 8/12/05, Matthew Somerville [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: ATB,Matthew[1] Defined as homestarrunner.com-

Re: [backstage] 3D?

2005-08-05 Thread Amias Channer
On Sat, 23 Jul 2005 03:15:53 -0400 Don Holeman [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: This page did not work in Firefox, though it did in IE. Client side scripting has a lot of drawbacks, browser dependency is only one of them. Flexibility and security are big issues too. I'm agreed that flash is the best

RE: [backstage] 3D?

2005-08-05 Thread Cox
already underway and that the Beeb will need to adapt.) -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Amias Channer Sent: Tuesday, August 02, 2005 9:01 AM To: backstage@lists.bbc.co.uk Subject: Re: [backstage] 3D? snip - Sent via the backstage.bbc.co.uk

Re: [backstage] 3D?

2005-07-23 Thread Richard Lockwood
www.htmlguru.com is your friend here. Specifically, http://www.htmlguru.com/content/webpages/guru/guru.html Very elderly site, but still very nice looking. (Although given that it's (c) 1998, don't expect it to work in Firefox / Mozilla based browsers.) However, if you want to work with 3d on

[backstage] 3D?

2005-07-22 Thread Davy Mitchell
Hey People, Has anyone seen any good 3D scenes done in CSS/DHTML? I'm thinking up a news visualisation (with a very abstract/arty direction) trying to use client side technologies but no plugins and minimum image files (if any). I am very sleepy. Sorry if this doesn't make sense. Thanks Bye.