@lists.bbc.co.uk
Sent: Thursday, August 11, 2005 9:13 AM
Subject: Re: [backstage] 3D?
On Wed, 10 Aug 2005, Tim Scollick wrote:
Big sites with
lots of content will continue to use html but the marketing dollars
will continue to gravitate to Flash.
Which to my mind is a real plus point for Flash
Tim Scollick wrote:
Dell, Coke, Nike, Microsoft, GM, Ford, VW, Toyota, Nissan, Adidas...
Indeed.
We do VW - www.newgolfgti.co.uk being the latest.
Try doing that in HTML.
No, I'm not a Flash developer, but I am appreciative of what it can do
and when it should be deployed. Flash can't do
On Thu, Aug 11, 2005 at 04:30:05PM +0100, Richard Lockwood wrote:
My point however that what you and J.P. describe as chaff is
neccessary for the evolution and development of the web still holds.
Someone has to pay for all this wonderful free content - if you can
come up with a better
Richard Lockwood wrote:
Sorry Stefan, but I've read a lot of Neilsen over the years, and he
still manages to frequently annoy me.
Neilsen's alertbox and so on make interesting reading occasionally, but
his updates rarely marry nicely with anything in the real world. The key
of course,
Well i am web technology journalist
Oh! Now it's all starting to make sense.
This does conflict with DRM quite heavily in that its impossible to hide
your data sources .
I didn't say anything about DRM. You're right. It can always be
hacked. Advertisers like to *give* video and audio
Brit wrote:
We do VW - www.newgolfgti.co.uk being the latest.
Try doing that in HTML.
I don't have a problem with Flash if used appropriately [1], but I do have a
problem with my Flash-disabled browser being redirected to the
experienceFlashYes.html page (which is then a plain black page,
or alternatively http://www.weebl.jolt.co.uk/--- although most of it would be a piece of pie to do in dHTML ;)
On 8/12/05, Matthew Somerville [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
ATB,Matthew[1] Defined as homestarrunner.com-
On Sat, 23 Jul 2005 03:15:53 -0400
Don Holeman [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
This page did not work in Firefox, though it did in IE. Client side
scripting has a lot of drawbacks, browser dependency is only one of
them.
Flexibility and security are big issues too. I'm agreed that flash is
the best
already underway and that the Beeb will
need to adapt.)
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Amias Channer
Sent: Tuesday, August 02, 2005 9:01 AM
To: backstage@lists.bbc.co.uk
Subject: Re: [backstage] 3D?
snip
-
Sent via the backstage.bbc.co.uk
www.htmlguru.com is your friend here. Specifically, http://www.htmlguru.com/content/webpages/guru/guru.html
Very elderly site, but still very nice looking. (Although given that it's (c) 1998, don't expect it to work in Firefox / Mozilla based browsers.)
However, if you want to work with 3d on
Hey People,
Has anyone seen any good 3D scenes done in CSS/DHTML?
I'm thinking up a news visualisation (with a very abstract/arty
direction) trying to use client side technologies but no plugins and
minimum image files (if any).
I am very sleepy. Sorry if this doesn't make sense.
Thanks Bye.
11 matches
Mail list logo