[backstage] Re: Sharing Code

Surely, it's more political or philosophical than merely sharing php code.. the fact is that after ten years or more there's still not a single successful web authoring application that's publishes accessible validated code and is used by the public. (in part which explains the rise of bl

RE: [backstage] Re: Sharing Code

> the fact is that after ten years or more there's still not a single successful web authoring application that's publishes accessible validated code I'm not sure that this is fault of the application - all your major desktop apps, as well as most (mainly open source) CMSes will happily produce ve

Re: [backstage] Re: Sharing Code

Jason, which web2.0 apis are you proposing that produce accessible or even validating code? cheers Jonathan Chetwynd On 1 Nov 2006, at 16:29, Jason Cartwright wrote: the fact is that after ten years or more there's still not a single successful web authoring application that's publishe

Re: [backstage] Re: Sharing Code

Jason, [Apologies if this is duplicated, but GMail is not indicating clearly whether this is making it to the list or not. :( ] I disagree. "Web 2.0", and whatever people's interpretations of this flimsy collection of technologies and concepts is, in my view invariably shows a shift to client-s

Re: [backstage] Re: Sharing Code

Jason, [Apologies if this appears twice. I doubt it will though, because I originally used the wrong 'from' address.] I disagree. "Web 2.0", and whatever people's interpretations of this flimsy collection of technologies and concepts is, in my view invariably shows a shift to client-side code.