Surely, it's more political or philosophical than merely sharing php
code..
the fact is that after ten years or more there's still not a single
successful web authoring application that's publishes accessible
validated code and is used by the public. (in part which explains the
rise of bl
> the fact is that after ten years or more there's still not a single
successful web authoring application that's publishes accessible
validated code
I'm not sure that this is fault of the application - all your major
desktop apps, as well as most (mainly open source) CMSes will happily
produce ve
Jason,
which web2.0 apis are you proposing that produce accessible or even
validating code?
cheers
Jonathan Chetwynd
On 1 Nov 2006, at 16:29, Jason Cartwright wrote:
the fact is that after ten years or more there's still not a single
successful web authoring application that's publishe
Jason,
[Apologies if this is duplicated, but GMail is not indicating clearly
whether this is making it to the list or not. :( ]
I disagree. "Web 2.0", and whatever people's interpretations of this
flimsy collection of technologies and concepts is, in my view invariably
shows a shift to client-s
Jason,
[Apologies if this appears twice. I doubt it will though, because I
originally used the wrong 'from' address.]
I disagree. "Web 2.0", and whatever people's interpretations of this
flimsy collection of technologies and concepts is, in my view invariably
shows a shift to client-side code.
5 matches
Mail list logo