On Fri, Mar 04, 2011 at 04:48:57PM -0500, Jeffrey J. Kosowsky wrote:
> It seems like there are two factors we are trying to capture
> - Relative resource intensity of each client backup
> - Interactions between subsets of clients
>
> It seems like we may need a concept both of 'grouping' and 'reso
Les Mikesell wrote at about 14:47:34 -0600 on Friday, March 4, 2011:
> On 3/4/2011 1:56 PM, Dan Pritts wrote:
> >
> > On Mar 2, 2011, at 10:25 PM, David Birnbaum wrote:
> >
> >> Craig,
> >>
> >> I realize a lot's gone into your thinking for 4.0 - I was wondering if it
> >> would be possibl
On 3/4/2011 1:56 PM, Dan Pritts wrote:
>
> On Mar 2, 2011, at 10:25 PM, David Birnbaum wrote:
>
>> Craig,
>>
>> I realize a lot's gone into your thinking for 4.0 - I was wondering if it
>> would be possible to offer some sort of "cost" parameter to the host
>> configuration. Specifically, we hav
On Mar 2, 2011, at 10:25 PM, David Birnbaum wrote:
> Craig,
>
> I realize a lot's gone into your thinking for 4.0 - I was wondering if it
> would be possible to offer some sort of "cost" parameter to the host
> configuration. Specifically, we have local hosts (backing up via a
Along similar
Craig,
I realize a lot's gone into your thinking for 4.0 - I was wondering if
it would be possible to offer some sort of "cost" parameter to the host
configuration. Specifically, we have local hosts (backing up via a 1GB
Ethernet connection) and remote hosts (often backing up at 1M or 768k
t
