[BackupPC-users] BackupPC 2.1.3 released

BackupPC 2.1.3 has been released on SF.net. This release includes the fixes in 2.1.2pl2, together with several additional fixes, in particular support for tar 1.16. I'm attaching the ChangeLog. Enjoy! Craig # # Version 2.1

Re: [BackupPC-users] problem with host name with dot

Jean-Michel writes: > little bug/problem in the LOG file with "pc name" with a dot in it : no URL > generated > > see here the difference between the PC "110.557" an PC "p_degand" : Fixed in 2.1.3 and 3.x CVS. Craig - Ta

Re: [BackupPC-users] "Failures that need your attention" - but not really

[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote on 01/21/2007 09:14:11 PM: > Tim writes: > > > I'm running BackupPC 3.0beta3. I had an archive fail over a month ago. > > I've since then successfully executed several archives. However, when > > you go to the status page, it still shows up as a 'Failure that need

Re: [BackupPC-users] "Failures that need your attention" - but not really

Tim writes: > I'm running BackupPC 3.0beta3. I had an archive fail over a month ago. > I've since then successfully executed several archives. However, when > you go to the status page, it still shows up as a 'Failure that needs my > attention.' The error should get cleared. Were the severa

Re: [BackupPC-users] backup of windows 2003 .bkf files

Bart writes: > I'm running into problems when trying to backup .bkf files from windows2003 > backup. My > normal backups are running fine. I'm using rsync over ssh for backups of our > linux boxes > and samba for our windows boxes. > > tarExtract: mkdir /home/backuppc/pc/192.168.0.4/new/fBACKU

[BackupPC-users] "Failures that need your attention" - but not really

Hello! I'm running BackupPC 3.0beta3. I had an archive fail over a month ago. I've since then successfully executed several archives. However, when you go to the status page, it still shows up as a 'Failure that needs my attention.' I find this somewhat distracting. It's kind of the same

Re: [BackupPC-users] Pooling & Incrementals -- I'm confused

Joe Casadonte wrote: > I'm using BackupPC 3.0.0beta3, if it matters. > > What is the difference between a Full and Incremental backup when > Pooling is involved? In a non-pooling backup scheme, a full backup > backs /everything/ up, whether or not it's changed since the last full > backup. This

[BackupPC-users] problem with host name with dot

Hello, in BackupPC3beta1 little bug/problem in the LOG file with "pc name" with a dot in it : no URL generated see here the difference between the PC "110.557" an PC "p_degand" : ... 2007-01-09 11:24:01 Started incr backup on 110.586 (pid=23816, share=USERS$) 2007-01-09 11:24:01 Started incr

Re: [BackupPC-users] Converting from tar to rsync

Bradley writes: > You know, I am beginning to like the rsync approach better and > better. I should be getting some DDR-266 or 400 RAM very soon > and will probably opt to make the switch. Is there a way to > gracefully switch over from tar to rsync? Or should I just > write off the backups I have

Re: [BackupPC-users] couldn't do /var/lib/backuppc/pc/.../archiveReq.

Am Sonntag, 21. Januar 2007 11:34 schrieb Lutz Kasper: > Am Freitag, 19. Januar 2007 12:51 schrieb Lutz Kasper: > > The question isn't new. > > I have make a backup from localhost about rsync. Then I have create > > archive-host and config.pl in there. Then I do a chown -R > > backuppc:backuppc n

Re: [BackupPC-users] couldn't do /var/lib/backuppc/pc/.../archiveReq.

Am Freitag, 19. Januar 2007 12:51 schrieb Lutz Kasper: > The question isn't new. > I have make a backup from localhost about rsync. Then I have create > archive-host and config.pl in there. Then I do a chown -R > backuppc:backuppc newhost. The archive-host I have add to the host file. > If I want