[BackupPC-users] Question about file size/reuse summary

2007-01-26 Thread Clemens von Musil
Hi all, first, I wanna thank you for a great backup tool and very, very helpfull list! Second - there still are some mysterials for me. ;-) I don't understand the summaries on my host status pages. Below, I copied a file site/count reuse summarym taken from a host I backup with rsync/ssh. I

Re: [BackupPC-users] BackupPC Data Directory on a Network Attached Storage

2007-01-26 Thread Simon Köstlin
Could it be that the problem is with my NFS, because if I mount the NFS it takes also around 30 seconds until it is mounted. I'm mounting my NFS with mount -t nfs 192.168.0.5:/home/backuppc /nas. -Ursprüngliche Nachricht- Von: Dan Pritts [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Gesendet: Donnerstag,

[BackupPC-users] switching from tar to rsync

2007-01-26 Thread Paul Fox
hi -- i have a couple of hosts at remote sites that i've started doing (partial) backups on. since i use tar everywhere locally, that's how i configured them at first. i realized later that that wasn't what i wanted, so i switched them to rsync, and immediately did a full backup on each. no

Re: [BackupPC-users] BackupPC Data Directory on a Network Attached Storage

2007-01-26 Thread Les Mikesell
Simon Köstlin wrote: Could it be that the problem is with my NFS, because if I mount the NFS it takes also around 30 seconds until it is mounted. I'm mounting my NFS with mount -t nfs 192.168.0.5:/home/backuppc /nas. It might (or might not) help to specify options for rsize and wsize in

Re: [BackupPC-users] Long: How BackupPC handles pooling, and how transfer methods affect bandwidth usage

2007-01-26 Thread Les Mikesell
Timothy J. Massey wrote: We now want to add a new host, which happens to be running the exact same operating system. They're not mirror images of each other, but they are naturally going to share a large number of common files. Let's assume that the new server contains 1GB worth of files,

Re: [BackupPC-users] Long: How BackupPC handles pooling, and how transfer methods affect bandwidth usage

2007-01-26 Thread Timothy J. Massey
Les Mikesell [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote on 01/26/2007 12:00:18 PM: Timothy J. Massey wrote: We now want to add a new host, which happens to be running the exact same operating system. They're not mirror images of each other, but they are naturally going to share a large number of common

[BackupPC-users] BackupPC v3 Tar Error

2007-01-26 Thread Olga Markova
Please help to solve problem with Tar exited with error 65288 I have backup-server COMP1 (linux) and client COMP2 (linux too). Backup should made through SSH, tar-method by root. The config.pl is following: $Conf{XferMethod} = 'tar'; $Conf{TarClientPath} = '/bin/tar'; $Conf{TarShareName} =

[BackupPC-users] every hour backup

2007-01-26 Thread Phong Nguyen
Hi all, I just would like to know if it is possible to make an incremental backup of a host every hour. I don't know how to set the value for $Conf{IncrPeriod} since it juste take a value counted in days. Thanks a lot Phong Nguyen Axone S.A. Geneva / Swiss

[BackupPC-users] Found a Bug

2007-01-26 Thread Willem Viljoen
Hi I have BackupPC 3.0.0.0 Beta3. I have a windows 2000 server with a few shares. I have set up backuppc to backup a share called root$. BackupPC will do a full dump of windows 2000 but refuses to do incremental backups. I have installed printer monitoring software on some of our servers

[BackupPC-users] Backup from a debian etch

2007-01-26 Thread Bruno Sampayo
Hello list, I tried to make a backup by backuppc on debian sarge install, and the server client is a Debian etch kernel: 2.6.8-2-386. When I start the full backuppc for this machine, I got a error with the follow message: [EMAIL PROTECTED]:~$ /usr/bin/perl

Re: [BackupPC-users] Long: How BackupPC handles pooling, and how transfer methods affect bandwidth usage

2007-01-26 Thread Les Mikesell
Timothy J. Massey wrote: I think there is a quick-fix here by doing a 'cp -a' of an existing similar host directory to the new one before the first backup run. That is an interesting solution. That would work for rsync (assuming my speculation is correct). Yes, it isn't necessary for

Re: [BackupPC-users] Long: How BackupPC handles pooling, and how transfer methods affect bandwidth usage

2007-01-26 Thread Timothy J. Massey
Les Mikesell [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote on 01/26/2007 03:23:45 PM: Timothy J. Massey wrote: I would love to see this abstracted a little more into a copy-host feature, that could copy a host to a new host, either within the same pool or to a different pool. After reading about how the

Re: [BackupPC-users] Long: How BackupPC handles pooling, and how transfer methods affect bandwidth usage

2007-01-26 Thread Timothy J. Massey
Les Mikesell [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote on 01/26/2007 04:04:43 PM: Timothy J. Massey wrote: It seems to me, then, that the documentation is *wrong*: rsync does not compare against the pool, *ever*; only against a previous backup (most likely the next-highest backup level, but I have

Re: [BackupPC-users] Long: How BackupPC handles pooling, and how transfer methods affect bandwidth usage

2007-01-26 Thread Holger Parplies
Hi, Timothy J. Massey wrote on 26.01.2007 at 15:44:25 [Re: [BackupPC-users] Long: How BackupPC handles pooling, and how transfer methods affect bandwidth usage]: Holger Parplies [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote on 01/26/2007 02:48:29 PM: I'm a bit confused by the terms 'host' and 'server'. [...]

Re: [BackupPC-users] Long: How BackupPC handles pooling, and how transfer methods affect bandwidth usage

2007-01-26 Thread Les Mikesell
Timothy J. Massey wrote: As BackupPC_tarExtract extracts the files from smbclient or tar, or as rsync runs, it checks each file in the backup to see if it is identical to an existing file from any previous backup of any PC.

Re: [BackupPC-users] Long: How BackupPC handles pooling, and how transfer methods affect bandwidth usage

2007-01-26 Thread Les Mikesell
Timothy J. Massey wrote: As a start, how about a utility that simply clones one host to another using only the pc/host directory tree, and assumes that none of the source files are in the pool, just like it would during a brand-new rsync backup? That would be better than nothing, but if

Re: [BackupPC-users] Long: How BackupPC handles pooling, and how transfer methods affect bandwidth usage

2007-01-26 Thread Holger Parplies
Hi, Les Mikesell wrote on 26.01.2007 at 20:53:11 [Re: [BackupPC-users] Long: How BackupPC handles pooling, and how transfer methods affect bandwidth usage]: Timothy J. Massey wrote: In reality, I'm still talking about a custom BackupPC client, but instead of targeting the host, I'm

Re: [BackupPC-users] Long: How BackupPC handles pooling, and how transfer methods affect bandwidth usage

2007-01-26 Thread Les Mikesell
Holger Parplies wrote: 3.) Reduced bandwidth requirement Because both ends understand the pooling mechanism, you have to transfer identical files at most once, and that only if they are not in the offsite pool yet. I don't think you'd want to count on the pools being identical,