-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
dan wrote:
> on linux you can install the vserver utilities (on debian/ubuntu apt-get
> install util-vserver)
>
What is wrong with using ulimit ? in bash, I think "help ulimit" or "man
ulimit" on most other (unix) systems should get you in the right
on linux you can install the vserver utilities (on debian/ubuntu apt-get
install util-vserver)
you can set the maximum number of pages available by
vlimit -c PID --rss #
where # = .004 * disired MB size so
vlimit -c PID --rss 1 = 40MB
you can expiriment what that a little. keep in mind that
On Jan 17, 2008 1:37 PM, Bowie Bailey <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I have a BackupPC server that I haven't touched in a while. It is currently
> running version 2.1.2pl1. Since I am so far behind, are there any problems
> I would run into upgrading this to the latest version? Anything in
> parti
On Jan 18, 2008 12:50 AM, KLEIN Stéphane <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> are there a directive or other stuff to limit memory usage (RAM) of
> backuppc ?
Not really, the maximum amount of memory is more or less tied to the
type of backups your are doing and the number of files being backed
up.
For e
Timothy J. Massey wrote:
> > DRDB might help propagate the disaster in real-time. I'm not convinced
> > that is desirable.
>
> You are correct; but that's what my second idea (replication of
> individual backups) is for: *automatic* and hands-off movement of
> backup data from one place to
dan wrote:
> A database can be an order of magnitude or more
> faster than direct file access.
Certain operations can be optimized differently, especially if you
compare a loaded/cached dataset to the first access to a file but how
can you expect a database to be faster in general than the fil
Actually most modern filesystems are a lot like a database. Though the
database is another level of abstraction from the hardware, there is a ton
less overhead creating a file which is small on a single file basis but
cumulatively with thousands or millions of files makes a big difference.
This is
Maybe I'll just move to rsync for the macs. If I use the built in
version of rsync that ships with 10.4 (Tiger) will it backup all the
resource fork information using the latest backuppc or do I have to do
additional tweaking to get it to work?
Thanks for the help!
James
Nils Breunese
Hi,
are there a directive or other stuff to limit memory usage (RAM) of
backuppc ?
Thanks for your information,
stephane
-
This SF.net email is sponsored by: Microsoft
Defy all challenges. Microsoft(R) Visual Studio 2008.
