With the amount of data I reported and number of files I just have 6% of inodes
occupied so I don't think that is really a problem, do you use XFS for any
special purpose besides dynamic inode creation? What do you think about
recovery and maintenance tools for XFS. And least but not lest don't
Koen Linders wrote:
> If you want an idea what isn't possible;
>
> A year ago I tried copying a much pool much smaller too an USB disk than my
> current (see lower), using a Xeon 2.8 GHz/1 MB with 2 GB DDR and it ran out
> of memory copying via rsync -H
>
> Somewhere in the mailing is other infor
If you want an idea what isn't possible;
A year ago I tried copying a much pool much smaller too an USB disk than my
current (see lower), using a Xeon 2.8 GHz/1 MB with 2 GB DDR and it ran out
of memory copying via rsync -H
Somewhere in the mailing is other information.
Someone said he does an
On 03/19 11:56 , Pedro M. S. Oliveira wrote:
> With the amount of data I reported and number of files I just have 6% of
> inodes occupied so I don't think that is really a problem, do you use XFS
> for any special purpose besides dynamic inode creation?
The ability to be resized while mounted is
Carl Wilhelm Soderstrom wrote:
>
> Backuppc will use all the processor, ram, and disk speed you give it. I've
> not had a box where they weren't all pegged. I tend to limit concurrent
> backups to 2; maybe 3 or 4 on a really high-end box (multiple processors and
> a proven fast disk array); to con
Les Mikesell a écrit :
[...]
> The whole archive needs to be on the same filesystem. If you use a
> separate disk/partition it needs to be mounted or symlinked at the
> /var/lib/backuppc level.
>
Thanks a lot, this worked out !
-
> Pool is 235.52GB comprising 718235 files and 4369 directories (as of 19/3
> 04:12),
Well, we just finished rsync'ing (after two days.. ) our complete
backuppc disk to new disks (over a dedicated gigabit ethernet link).
Currently running on 3x 500 gb raid5, athlon64 3ghz, 3gb ram.. We
backup 50 h
2009/3/18 Pedro M. S. Oliveira :
> From what I've seen on the list there are some people using XFS, Ext3, and
> so on. What's your experience with the different file systems?
> What FS do you guys use recommend/used and why?
We use XFS on a 3-disk raid 5 (3x500gb).
Just because we're used to usin
This was originally part of:
Subject: Re: [BackupPC-users] FS and backuppc performance
In-Reply-To: <49c29c96.4030...@gmail.com>
I am starting a new thread on this rather then hijacking the original
thread.
On Thu, Mar 19, 2009 at 02:27:18PM -0500, Les Mikesell wrote:
> Carl Wilhelm Soderstr
Hi everyone.
As the subject says, I've run into this issue where BackupPC believes the
connection is unsecure when it is not. I did some general debugging and info
collection...
ON BACKUPPC CLIENT
# cat /etc/hosts.allow
# cat /etc/hosts.deny
# /usr/bin/rsync --version
rsync
10 matches
Mail list logo
