Robin, thank you: exactly what I needed.
--
This SF Dev2Dev email is sponsored by:
WikiLeaks The End of the Free Internet
http://p.sf.net/sfu/therealnews-com
___
BackupPC-users
also sprach Jeffrey J. Kosowsky backu...@kosowsky.org [2010.11.17.0059 +0100]:
I wrote two programs that might be helpful here:
1. BackupPC_digestVerify.pl
If you use rsync with checksum caching then this program checks the
(uncompressed) contents of each pool file against the stored md4
Le 09/12/2010 06:55, hans...@gmail.com a écrit :
I've been investigating how to backup BackupPC's filesystem,
specifically the tree with all the hard links (BTW what's the right
name for it, the one that's not the pool?)
The goal is to be able to bring a verified-good copy of the whole
All the transfer methods (smb, rsync, tar) allow you to specify which
folders you wish to back up.
The way to achieve what you want is to create two 'hosts' to be backed
up, say myserver1 and myserver2 for the server myserver. For each one
set up for just one of the two folders, with the
I'm trying to run backuppc on a debian-based plugcomputer.
I would rather not install apache (or anything else extra for that
matter) -- since I only use the CLI anyway.
- Do I have to do anything special to get backuppc to work without the
web interface (and with no apache)? Or is apache
martin f krafft wrote at about 09:53:25 +0100 on Thursday, December 9, 2010:
also sprach Jeffrey J. Kosowsky backu...@kosowsky.org [2010.11.17.0059
+0100]:
I wrote two programs that might be helpful here:
1. BackupPC_digestVerify.pl
If you use rsync with checksum caching then this
Just bumping this. I need to get this machine back on its routine. Please
let me know if there's any additional information I can provide to help you
help me.
Thanks so much!
-Frank
2010/12/7 Frank J. Gómez fr...@crop-circle.net
A Windows 7 laptop is failing with backup failed (No files
On 12/09 12:48 , Jeffrey J. Kosowsky wrote:
Since this error can cause major failures, I'm surprised that an email
isn't sent out.
In fact, I think it would be helpful that any error that causes a
failure or potential pool corruption should be mailed to the user.
Along those same lines, I
On 12/09 09:53 , Frank J. Gómez wrote:
smbclient 13708n1\\win7home -U backuppc -E -d 3
I get this in the output:
Doing spnego session setup (blob length=336)
SPNEGO login failed: Invalid parameter
snip
Here's another interesting bit of information; when I run:
snip
Is
Carl Wilhelm Soderstrom wrote at about 09:41:03 -0600 on Thursday, December 9,
2010:
On 12/09 12:48 , Jeffrey J. Kosowsky wrote:
Since this error can cause major failures, I'm surprised that an email
isn't sent out.
In fact, I think it would be helpful that any error that causes a
On Thu, Dec 09, 2010 at 09:53:25AM +0100, martin f krafft wrote:
also sprach Jeffrey J. Kosowsky backu...@kosowsky.org [2010.11.17.0059
+0100]:
I wrote two programs that might be helpful here:
1. BackupPC_digestVerify.pl
If you use rsync with checksum caching then this program checks
Robin Lee Powell wrote at about 11:20:26 -0800 on Thursday, December 9, 2010:
On Thu, Dec 09, 2010 at 09:53:25AM +0100, martin f krafft wrote:
also sprach Jeffrey J. Kosowsky backu...@kosowsky.org [2010.11.17.0059
+0100]:
I wrote two programs that might be helpful here:
1.
On Thu, Dec 09, 2010 at 03:03:37PM -0500, Jeffrey J. Kosowsky wrote:
Robin Lee Powell wrote at about 11:20:26 -0800 on Thursday, December 9, 2010:
On Thu, Dec 09, 2010 at 09:53:25AM +0100, martin f krafft wrote:
also sprach Jeffrey J. Kosowsky backu...@kosowsky.org [2010.11.17.0059
At least all files beneath the share level that is...
My backup system is down so I can't check at the host level.
But I also wanted to confirm that this holds true not just for normal
files but for links (soft hard) and other special files.
(of course it's not true for directories)
Thanks
Robin Lee Powell wrote at about 12:06:24 -0800 on Thursday, December 9, 2010:
On Thu, Dec 09, 2010 at 03:03:37PM -0500, Jeffrey J. Kosowsky wrote:
Robin Lee Powell wrote at about 11:20:26 -0800 on Thursday, December 9,
2010:
On Thu, Dec 09, 2010 at 09:53:25AM +0100, martin f krafft
On Thu, Dec 09, 2010 at 03:15:41PM -0500, Jeffrey J. Kosowsky wrote:
Robin Lee Powell wrote at about 12:06:24 -0800 on Thursday,
December 9, 2010:
On Thu, Dec 09, 2010 at 03:03:37PM -0500, Jeffrey J. Kosowsky
wrote:
Robin Lee Powell wrote at about 11:20:26 -0800 on Thursday,
Holger Parplies wrote at about 23:25:32 +0100 on Thursday, December 9, 2010:
Hi,
Welcome back!!! - I was beginning to miss you on the list...
Jeffrey J. Kosowsky wrote on 2010-12-07 13:16:32 -0500 [Re: [BackupPC-users]
Bizarre form of cpool corruption.]:
Robin Lee Powell wrote at
Hi,
Jeffrey J. Kosowsky wrote on 2010-12-07 13:16:32 -0500 [Re: [BackupPC-users]
Bizarre form of cpool corruption.]:
Robin Lee Powell wrote at about 23:46:11 -0800 on Monday, December 6, 2010:
[...]
So, yeah, that's really it. They're both really there, and that's
the right md5sum,
On 12/9/2010 4:44 PM, Jeffrey J. Kosowsky wrote:
This also is a very logical explanation for how it can happen if the
Backuppc linking is not working.
If I recall correctly, the first time you would do a
subsequent incremental then it should all get linked back to the pool
since they are
On Thu, Dec 09, 2010 at 12:05:01AM -0500, Jeffrey J. Kosowsky wrote:
Anyway here is the diff. I have not had time to check it much
beyond verifying that it seems to run -- SO I WOULD TRULY
APPRECIATE IT IF YOU CONTINUE TO TEST IT AND GIVE ME FEEDBACK.
Also, it would be great if you would let
Smbclient version is 3.4.7. The user and I will not again be in the office
at the same time until Tuesday, but I believe the share is inaccessible
(invisible, even) from other Windows machines. I should mention that other
Windows 7 machines are working smoothly with BackupPC. I think it is
On Tue, Dec 07, 2010 at 02:27:46PM -0500, Jeffrey J. Kosowsky wrote:
Robin Lee Powell wrote at about 11:05:46 -0800 on Tuesday, December 7, 2010:
On Tue, Dec 07, 2010 at 01:58:28PM -0500, Jeffrey J. Kosowsky wrote:
Robin Lee Powell wrote at about 15:40:04 -0800 on Monday, December 6,
On Thu, Dec 09, 2010 at 12:35:46AM -0500, Jeffrey J. Kosowsky wrote:
Jeffrey J. Kosowsky wrote at about 13:58:28 -0500 on Tuesday, December 7,
2010:
Robin Lee Powell wrote at about 15:40:04 -0800 on Monday, December 6, 2010:
This is *fascinating*.
From the
Robin Lee Powell wrote at about 15:24:30 -0800 on Thursday, December 9, 2010:
On Thu, Dec 09, 2010 at 12:05:01AM -0500, Jeffrey J. Kosowsky wrote:
Anyway here is the diff. I have not had time to check it much
beyond verifying that it seems to run -- SO I WOULD TRULY
APPRECIATE IT IF YOU
Robin Lee Powell wrote at about 15:35:26 -0800 on Thursday, December 9, 2010:
Well, it was designed (and tested) for the use case where this was
a *rare* event so that it would be interesting to signal it.
Perhaps even then WARN or NOTICE would have been better than
ERROR. Indeed,
Robin Lee Powell wrote at about 15:38:27 -0800 on Thursday, December 9, 2010:
On Thu, Dec 09, 2010 at 12:35:46AM -0500, Jeffrey J. Kosowsky wrote:
Jeffrey J. Kosowsky wrote at about 13:58:28 -0500 on Tuesday, December 7,
2010:
Robin Lee Powell wrote at about 15:40:04 -0800 on Monday,
On Thu, Dec 09, 2010 at 06:41:22PM -0500, Jeffrey J. Kosowsky wrote:
Robin Lee Powell wrote at about 15:24:30 -0800 on Thursday, December 9, 2010:
On Thu, Dec 09, 2010 at 12:05:01AM -0500, Jeffrey J. Kosowsky wrote:
Anyway here is the diff. I have not had time to check it much
beyond
Hi,
Les Mikesell wrote on 2010-12-09 17:08:05 -0600 [Re: [BackupPC-users] Bizarre
form of cpool corruption.]:
On 12/9/2010 4:44 PM, Jeffrey J. Kosowsky wrote:
If I recall correctly, the first time you would do a
subsequent incremental then it should all get linked back to the pool
since
Jeffrey writes:
But I also wanted to confirm that this holds true not just for normal
files but for links (soft hard) and other special files.
Yes, all non-empty files should be pooled (including hard links, soft
links, char/block special files and attribute files).
Craig
29 matches
Mail list logo
