> If you want _status_ email, you can run script from post below by cron at
any time you want.
>
http://www.mail-archive.com/backuppc-users@lists.sourceforge.net/msg07891.ht
ml
> == sample output ==
> 2012-05-09 09:53
size duration | xfer
Sha
On Wed, May 9, 2012 at 4:56 PM, James Ward wrote:
> It was the firewall! Sorry for making you wonder!
So you shouldn't have actually gotten a 500 error back- although these
days browsers go out of their way to make the real problem hard to
find...
--
Les Mikesell
lesmikes...@gmail.com
It was the firewall! Sorry for making you wonder!
- Original Message -
From: "James Ward"
To: "General list for user discussion, questions and support"
Sent: Wednesday, May 9, 2012 2:21:31 PM
Subject: Re: [BackupPC-users] apache config?
It does return html. :-/
- Original Messag
It does return html. :-/
- Original Message -
From: "Les Mikesell"
To: "General list for user discussion, questions and support"
Sent: Wednesday, May 9, 2012 1:46:44 PM
Subject: Re: [BackupPC-users] apache config?
On Wed, May 9, 2012 at 2:28 PM, James Ward wrote:
> Any other ideas?
On Wed, May 9, 2012 at 2:28 PM, James Ward wrote:
> Any other ideas? I've lost control of my BackupPC!
>
You could try su'ing to apache (or is that www-something on debian?)
and then executing the BackupPC_Admin cgi script with perl to see if
you get an error of some sort instead of the html for
On Wednesday 09 May 2012 12:28:48 James Ward wrote:
> Any other ideas? I've lost control of my BackupPC!
Nope. There is also the command-line interface and the config files. The webgui
is just an addon. There is nothing wrong when it fails...
Please check the install-howto of backuppc and check
On May 9, 2012 2:33 PM, "James Ward" wrote:
>
> Any other ideas? I've lost control of my BackupPC!
>
> - Original Message -
> From: "Les Mikesell"
> To: "General list for user discussion, questions and support" <
backuppc-users@lists.sourceforge.net>
> Sent: Wednesday, May 9, 2012 10:37:
Any other ideas? I've lost control of my BackupPC!
- Original Message -
From: "Les Mikesell"
To: "General list for user discussion, questions and support"
Sent: Wednesday, May 9, 2012 10:37:23 AM
Subject: Re: [BackupPC-users] apache config?
On Wed, May 9, 2012 at 12:17 PM, James Ward
On Wed, May 9, 2012 at 12:17 PM, James Ward wrote:
> Sadly, apache's error log is silent. :-/
Seems odd - I thought it would log something there if it returns a 500.
--
Les Mikesell
lesmikes...@gmail.com
--
Liv
Sadly, apache's error log is silent. :-/
- Original Message -
From: "Les Mikesell"
To: "General list for user discussion, questions and support"
Sent: Wednesday, May 9, 2012 9:01:07 AM
Subject: Re: [BackupPC-users] apache config?
On Wed, May 9, 2012 at 10:51 AM, James Ward wrote:
>
>
On Wed, May 9, 2012 at 11:01 AM, Matthew Baker wrote:
>>
> By looking at the size of directories growing under the clients new
> directory I could see that /proc was most active. This particular client
> didn't have a specific BackupFilesExclude config so I've set a global
> default to:
>
> $Conf{
On Wed, May 9, 2012 at 10:51 AM, James Ward wrote:
>
> $ ps -ef|grep backuppc
> backuppc 25309 1 0 08:44 ? 00:00:00 /usr/bin/perl
> /usr/share/backuppc/bin/BackupPC -d
> backuppc 25311 25309 0 08:44 ? 00:00:00 /usr/bin/perl
> /usr/share/backuppc/bin/BackupPC_trashClean
>
> Ap
On 09/05/12 16:33, Matthew Baker wrote:
> On 05/05/12 19:54, Matthew Baker wrote:
>> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
>> Hash: SHA1
>>
>> On 17/09/11 20:51, James L. Evans wrote:
Not sure why that would be true. Do they use the same versions
of BackupPC?
>>>
>>> lenny was 3.1.0-4. squee
I stopped and started BackupPC and apache and still have the same problem. Any
other ideas?
$ ps -ef|grep backuppc
backuppc 25309 1 0 08:44 ?00:00:00 /usr/bin/perl
/usr/share/backuppc/bin/BackupPC -d
backuppc 25311 25309 0 08:44 ?00:00:00 /usr/bin/perl
/usr/share/backuppc
On 05/05/12 19:54, Matthew Baker wrote:
> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> Hash: SHA1
>
> On 17/09/11 20:51, James L. Evans wrote:
>>> Not sure why that would be true. Do they use the same versions
>>> of BackupPC?
>>
>> lenny was 3.1.0-4. squeeze is 3.1.0-9
>>
>>> It's also very likely that th
15 matches
Mail list logo