2016-01-18 2:46 GMT+01:00 Adam Goryachev :
> It would be interesting to hear an update of where you are at, and what
> has happened (either good or bad).
Ok, today is the third day of backup running "properly".
Some things are not clear:
2016-01-16 01:32:24 full backup started for directory full
This is my localhost.pl, it's very diferent...
#
# Local server backup of /etc as user backuppc
#
$Conf{XferMethod} = 'tar';
$Conf{TarShareName} = [
'/data'
];
$Conf{TarClientCmd} = '/usr/bin/env LC_ALL=C $tarPath -c -v -f - -C
$shareName --totals';
# remove extra shell escapes ($fileList+ et
--
Site24x7 APM Insight: Get Deep Visibility into Application Performance
APM + Mobile APM + RUM: Monitor 3 App instances at just $35/Month
Monitor end-to-end web transactions and take corrective actions now
Troubleshoot f
On 01/18 10:18 , David Rotger wrote:
> This is my localhost.pl, it's very diferent...
The important thing is that your localhost.pl (which I think is the default
one the package comes with) doesn't include 'sudo' which is needed to
capture files like /etc/shadow which are not world-readable.
> $C
On 18/01/2016 19:38, Gandalf Corvotempesta wrote:
> 2016-01-18 2:46 GMT+01:00 Adam Goryachev
> :
>> It would be interesting to hear an update of where you are at, and what
>> has happened (either good or bad).
> Ok, today is the third day of backup running "properly".
>
> Some things are not cle
2016-01-18 13:56 GMT+01:00 Adam Goryachev :
> Well, that part makes sense, if #0 is deleted/missing, and you want one
> full minimum, then the system must do a full backup. The question is why
> did backup #0 vanish after the incremental and before the 2nd full was done?
cut
> One thing to remember
On Mon, Jan 18, 2016 at 9:40 AM, Gandalf Corvotempesta
wrote:
> 2016-01-18 13:56 GMT+01:00 Adam Goryachev
> :
>> Well, that part makes sense, if #0 is deleted/missing, and you want one
>> full minimum, then the system must do a full backup. The question is why
>> did backup #0 vanish after the in
2016-01-18 17:07 GMT+01:00 Les Mikesell :
> Why don't you put back the default settings to see they work as
> expected?
Because i'm using default settings except posted lines.
I wont decrease full interval, not for waste of space but to not
transfer everything from the client, that is resource he
On Mon, Jan 18, 2016 at 10:16 AM, Gandalf Corvotempesta
wrote:
> 2016-01-18 17:07 GMT+01:00 Les Mikesell :
>> Why don't you put back the default settings to see they work as
>> expected?
>
> Because i'm using default settings except posted lines.
>
> I wont decrease full interval, not for waste of
On 18.01.16 19:53, Les Mikesell wrote:
> Does anyone understand the docs at
> http://backuppc.sourceforge.net/BackupPC-4.0.0alpha3_doc.html
> for $Conf{FillCycle} ? It looks like expiring is really based on
> 'filled' backups, not necessarily full backups as in v3. The part I
> don't get is that
On Mon, Jan 18, 2016 at 12:25 PM, Alexander Moisseev
wrote:
> On 18.01.16 19:53, Les Mikesell wrote:
>> Does anyone understand the docs at
>> http://backuppc.sourceforge.net/BackupPC-4.0.0alpha3_doc.html
>> for $Conf{FillCycle} ? It looks like expiring is really based on
>> 'filled' backups, not
On 18.01.16 21:33, Les Mikesell wrote:
> On Mon, Jan 18, 2016 at 12:25 PM, Alexander Moisseev
> wrote:
>> On 18.01.16 19:53, Les Mikesell wrote:
>>> Does anyone understand the docs at
>>> http://backuppc.sourceforge.net/BackupPC-4.0.0alpha3_doc.html
>>> for $Conf{FillCycle} ? It looks like expir
12 matches
Mail list logo
