BackupPC_dump:
foreach my $k (keys(%stat)) {
if ($stat{$k} =~ /^$/) {
%stat{$k} = 0;
}
}
Thanks,
Bill
-
This SF.net email is sponsored by: Splunk Inc.
Still grepping through log files to find problems? Stop
quot; module from your CentOS machine, then maybe there's something in
> your previously-used syntax that CentOS doesn't like. (Perhaps it
> doesn't like the "bpc@" portion, although I've never had trouble with
> that type of syntax).
>
> -Rob
>
> Bill
SX 10.4) using the exact same
syntax on the exact same revision of rsync, everything works as expected:
*suspect:~/bpc root# rsync -av [EMAIL PROTECTED]::docs .
Password:
receiving file list ...
*
So, I'm just not clear on what exactly is going on under the hood here that
is such an issue
As I
showed in my examples, the rsync command works great from an OSX
client, and in fact they're the same rsync version, 2.3.6.
I know what rsync and rsyncd are. I don't know how to get a more
recent version of rsync on a linux machine to talk nicely to the
bundled rsyncd on the backup
Hello,
I've been trying to figure out how to use the windows rsyncd package
from the backuppc site. Everything is installed fine, and if I
connect using rsync from my Mac laptop (OSX), rsync works as expected.
If, however, I connect from a linux based machine, it tries to use
ssh as the default
n I mount/unmount using shell
scripts.
This is most useful on laptops, however, where I may not be at home or
where the network is not set up - having a box that tries to mount those
file systems on every boot can get annoying.
/bill
---
cron checks,
so...
Let us know when it goes live
Bill
-
Using Tomcat but need to do more? Need to support web services, security?
Get stuff done quickly with pre-integrated technology to make your job easier
Download
Les Mikesell wrote:
> On Sat, 2006-07-29 at 14:16, Bill Hudacek wrote:
>
>> As I said, this is the first time I've seen such a foolish
>> use of something as powerful as Yum.
>
> You don't have to run it unattended... Yum doesn't push - your
> copy pul
H. I'd just used "samba", assuming regexp. Thanks, I'll put the
explicit entries instead. I suppose the intent is that it's rarely
used, if they are doing explicit matches :-)
Thanks, Ken -
/bill
ken wrote:
>> On Sat, 2006-07-29 at 12:28, Bill Hudacek wr
Les Mikesell wrote:
> On Sat, 2006-07-29 at 12:28, Bill Hudacek wrote:
>
>> Fedora Core and Yum is a great system for automatically updating your
>> system. but only when you can trust it. This is the first time it's
>> really and truly failed me - and it's
The core Samba protocol support seems to be intact and working. I can't
figure it out beyond that, I've never felt the need to get to know Samba
that well (and at this point I likely won't ever want to touch it this
much again).
I hope this helps someone save some time, as it's c
problem, I'll set up
rsync on winders before I'll go back to an earlier version of Samba.
Just found this too - looks like 3.0.23 was not the first affected version.
http://www.linuxquestions.org/questions/showthre
Les Mikesell wrote:
> On Tue, 2006-07-18 at 21:57, Bill Hudacek wrote:
>
> Is there some subtle difference in your $Conf{SmbClientFullCmd} and
> $Conf{SmbClientIncrCmd} entries? Can you execute something
> resembling the expanded incremental command manually with
> smbclien
mmand line. Sigh! The mystery deepens.
-Bill
-
Take Surveys. Earn Cash. Influence the Future of IT
Join SourceForge.net's Techsay panel and you'll get the chance to share your
opinions on IT & business topics
ructions
did not work either.
Still looking here, but I don't have time for this stuff right now :-(
Bill Hudacek
> --
> Víctor A. Rodríguez (http://www.bit-man.com.ar)
> El bit Fantasma (Bit-Man)
> CaFe.pm - Perl Mongers Capital Federal (http://cafe.pm.org/)
> Proba
Argh. Thunderbird strikes again. The list should really be the
Reply-To: on these articles!
Sorry, Les :-)
Original Message
Subject: Re: [BackupPC-users] Host Backup Summary
Date: Mon, 29 May 2006 21:03:34 -0400
From: Bill Hudacek <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: Les Mi
previous full)
>>That's not good : (
>>I rather not to do full often ( I thought I just need one full backup).
>>But what's the best way to do this?
>>
--
Regards,
Bill Hudacek
"Redundancy is good; triple redundancy is twice as goo
re-5 boxen. Yet.
Might be a good day to just try and run "yum upgrade". Nah. It's the
weekend
--
Regards,
Bill Hudacek
"Redundancy is good; triple redundancy is twice as good!" - me
---
This S
Rsync is broken. Borked. Unworkable. Dysfunctional. My version is
2.6.7.2.fc3.rf
I am going to try his solution today. I haven't had time so my internet
gateway isn't getting backed up, but it hardly ever changes (except when
yum breaks things!).
HTH
--
Regards,
Bill Hud
/BackupPC_serverMesg
backup server.example.com server.example.com backuppc 1
I love the commas, I use them to run jobs every 12 minutes, or 10 times an
hour :-)
--
Regards,
Bill Hudacek
"Redundancy is good; triple redundancy is twice as good!&
of the
SI prefixes. Mega will mean 1 000 000, except that the
base-two
definition may be used (if such usage is explicitly pointed out on a
case-by-case
basis) until such time that prefixes for binary multiples are adopted
by
an appropriate standards body.
"
--
Regards,
Bill Hudacek
&quo
This is purely a "straw man" approach, entirely built using my limited
knowledge of Notes on the server side, and my *nix skills :-)
Notes "compacts" and updates indexes for databases, typically using
server agents, which (typically) run at night. If you have archiving -
or expiration manag
ess.
I'm not a developer of BackupPC and I don't know anything about "VSS" at
this point, so I'll just step aside now and wait with you for other
opinions, Scott :-)
Bill Hudacek
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Sorry to hit the list with this but once in awhile I wander
can't be hacked out by
following the outline of the Linux and Solaris examples in the program
package.
Thanks for any help,
--
Bill Totman
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
---
This SF.Net email is sponsored by the JBoss Inc. Get Certified Today
Regi
his figured out. I
haven't had to face this demon (no pun intended) yet...knock wood.
/bill
Rick DeNatale wrote:
Executive Summary:
I think that the script in the backuppc faq used to avoid client
access as root has a bug. It should not use the --server and --sender
arguments to rsync, bu
mpted to ignore it except for the fact that it might be a sign of
something wrong that could be more serious. Permissions, perhaps?
Fulls and a couple of incrementals have run successfully (and are
browsable), but I have not yet tested a restore.
I'd welcome
ht to me anyway. If it were a wiki, I'd add it myself, but
before anyone asks...no, I don't have bandwidth to take over anyone's
FAQ :-)
Nice to meet you all.
Bill
---
SF.Net email is Sponsored by the Better Software Conf
hat I've not
yet been an active participant, but I do hope to do my feature requests
at least.
Bill
---
SF.Net email is Sponsored by the Better Software Conference & EXPO
September 19-22, 2005 * San Francisco, CA * Development Lifec
28 matches
Mail list logo
