On Apr 21, 2017, at 7:39 PM, Les Mikesell
mailto:lesmikes...@gmail.com>> wrote:
If you think about what rysnc is supposed to do, it doesn't make much
sense to run both ends locally accessing data over NFS.
I would think it depends. I have found many cases in environments where
running rsync be
Hi,
Les Mikesell wrote on 2017-04-21 18:39:59 -0500 [Re: [BackupPC-users] BackupPC
4.1.1 and NFS shares]:
> On Fri, Apr 21, 2017 at 5:09 PM, Bedynek, Matthew J.
> wrote:
> > With version 3 I am using Rsync instead of tar to backup a NFS share which
> > the backupPC host ha
On Fri, Apr 21, 2017 at 5:09 PM, Bedynek, Matthew J. wrote:
> All,
>
> With version 3 I am using Rsync instead of tar to backup a NFS share which
> the backupPC host has direct access to. This has worked great with the
> exception that linking takes forever if there are a large number of files.
All,
With version 3 I am using Rsync instead of tar to backup a NFS share which the
backupPC host has direct access to. This has worked great with the exception
that linking takes forever if there are a large number of files. I simply
didn’t have much luck getting version 3 to work with tar
