Re: [BackupPC-users] BackupPC 4.1.1 and NFS shares

2017-04-28 Thread Bedynek, Matthew J.
On Apr 21, 2017, at 7:39 PM, Les Mikesell > wrote: If you think about what rysnc is supposed to do, it doesn't make much sense to run both ends locally accessing data over NFS. I would think it depends. I have found many cases in environments

Re: [BackupPC-users] BackupPC 4.1.1 and NFS shares

2017-04-24 Thread Holger Parplies
Hi, Les Mikesell wrote on 2017-04-21 18:39:59 -0500 [Re: [BackupPC-users] BackupPC 4.1.1 and NFS shares]: > On Fri, Apr 21, 2017 at 5:09 PM, Bedynek, Matthew J. <bedyne...@ornl.gov> > wrote: > > With version 3 I am using Rsync instead of tar to backup a NFS share which > &g

Re: [BackupPC-users] BackupPC 4.1.1 and NFS shares

2017-04-21 Thread Les Mikesell
On Fri, Apr 21, 2017 at 5:09 PM, Bedynek, Matthew J. wrote: > All, > > With version 3 I am using Rsync instead of tar to backup a NFS share which > the backupPC host has direct access to. This has worked great with the > exception that linking takes forever if there are a

[BackupPC-users] BackupPC 4.1.1 and NFS shares

2017-04-21 Thread Bedynek, Matthew J.
All, With version 3 I am using Rsync instead of tar to backup a NFS share which the backupPC host has direct access to. This has worked great with the exception that linking takes forever if there are a large number of files. I simply didn’t have much luck getting version 3 to work with tar