Hi,
Les Mikesell wrote on 2010-12-09 17:08:05 -0600 [Re: [BackupPC-users] Bizarre
form of cpool corruption.]:
> On 12/9/2010 4:44 PM, Jeffrey J. Kosowsky wrote:
> >
> > If I recall correctly, the first time you would do a
> > subsequent incremental then it should all get li
On Thu, Dec 09, 2010 at 06:41:22PM -0500, Jeffrey J. Kosowsky wrote:
> Robin Lee Powell wrote at about 15:24:30 -0800 on Thursday, December 9, 2010:
> > On Thu, Dec 09, 2010 at 12:05:01AM -0500, Jeffrey J. Kosowsky wrote:
> > > Anyway here is the diff. I have not had time to check it much
> > >
Robin Lee Powell wrote at about 15:24:30 -0800 on Thursday, December 9, 2010:
> On Thu, Dec 09, 2010 at 12:05:01AM -0500, Jeffrey J. Kosowsky wrote:
> > Anyway here is the diff. I have not had time to check it much
> > beyond verifying that it seems to run -- SO I WOULD TRULY
> > APPRECIATE IT
On Thu, Dec 09, 2010 at 12:05:01AM -0500, Jeffrey J. Kosowsky wrote:
> Anyway here is the diff. I have not had time to check it much
> beyond verifying that it seems to run -- SO I WOULD TRULY
> APPRECIATE IT IF YOU CONTINUE TO TEST IT AND GIVE ME FEEDBACK.
> Also, it would be great if you would le
On 12/9/2010 4:44 PM, Jeffrey J. Kosowsky wrote:
>
>
> This also is a very logical explanation for how it can happen if the
> Backuppc linking is not working.
>
> If I recall correctly, the first time you would do a
> subsequent incremental then it should all get linked back to the pool
> since the
Hi,
Jeffrey J. Kosowsky wrote on 2010-12-07 13:16:32 -0500 [Re: [BackupPC-users]
Bizarre form of cpool corruption.]:
> Robin Lee Powell wrote at about 23:46:11 -0800 on Monday, December 6, 2010:
> > [...]
> > So, yeah, that's really it. They're both really there,
Holger Parplies wrote at about 23:25:32 +0100 on Thursday, December 9, 2010:
> Hi,
Welcome back!!! - I was beginning to miss you on the list...
>
> Jeffrey J. Kosowsky wrote on 2010-12-07 13:16:32 -0500 [Re: [BackupPC-users]
> Bizarre form of cpool corruption.]:
> > Robi
Robin Lee Powell wrote at about 17:02:06 -0800 on Monday, December 6, 2010:
> On Mon, Dec 06, 2010 at 01:17:43PM -0800, Robin Lee Powell wrote:
> >
> > So, yeah. More than one link, matches something in the pool, but
> > not actually linked to it. Isn't that *awesome*? ;'(
> >
> > I very
Craig Barratt wrote at about 22:38:42 -0800 on Tuesday, December 7, 2010:
> Robin writes:
>
> > > In fact, it was for applications like this that I had suggested a
> > > while back adding the partial md5sum to the attrib file so that
> > > the reverse lookup can be done more cheaply
> >
>
Robin writes:
> > In fact, it was for applications like this that I had suggested a
> > while back adding the partial md5sum to the attrib file so that
> > the reverse lookup can be done more cheaply
>
> That would, in fact, be fantastic.
>
> > (the need for all of this will be obviated when Cr
On Tue, Dec 07, 2010 at 01:16:32PM -0500, Jeffrey J. Kosowsky wrote:
> Robin, can you just clarify the context. Did this apparent pool
> corruption only occur after running BackupPC_tarPCCopy or did it
> occur in the course of "normal" backuppc running.
I honestly don't know; I've done so much on
Robin Lee Powell wrote at about 23:46:11 -0800 on Monday, December 6, 2010:
> On Mon, Dec 06, 2010 at 11:33:15PM -0800, Craig Barratt wrote:
> > Robin,
> >
> > > Nope; I'm a big tab completion user, so I would have seen it. ;)
> > >
> > > $ ls -li /backups/cpool/1/5/c/15c0e4b08058ef3704b8f
On Tue, Dec 07, 2010 at 01:07:50PM -0500, Jeffrey J. Kosowsky wrote:
> 2. More importantly, there is no fast way
No, there really isn't.
> that I know of checking whether a pc entry with more than one link
> is in the pool. You first need to read in the 1st MB of each file,
> calculate the partia
Robin Lee Powell wrote at about 13:17:43 -0800 on Monday, December 6, 2010:
> On Mon, Dec 06, 2010 at 03:48:04PM -0500, Jeffrey J. Kosowsky wrote:
> > Robin Lee Powell wrote at about 10:37:52 -0800 on Monday, December 6, 2010:
> > >
> > > So I'm writing a script to transfer a client from one
On Mon, Dec 06, 2010 at 11:33:15PM -0800, Craig Barratt wrote:
> Robin,
>
> > Nope; I'm a big tab completion user, so I would have seen it. ;)
> >
> > $ ls -li /backups/cpool/1/5/c/15c0e4b08058ef3704b8fc24887e2bcc*
> > 255523133 -rw-r- 3 backuppc backuppc 27 Nov 22 19:33
> > /backups/cpool/
Robin,
> Nope; I'm a big tab completion user, so I would have seen it. ;)
>
> $ ls -li /backups/cpool/1/5/c/15c0e4b08058ef3704b8fc24887e2bcc*
> 255523133 -rw-r- 3 backuppc backuppc 27 Nov 22 19:33
> /backups/cpool/1/5/c/15c0e4b08058ef3704b8fc24887e2bcc
Hmmm. I'm not familiar with Jeffrey'
On Mon, Dec 06, 2010 at 10:46:12PM -0800, Craig Barratt wrote:
> Robin,
>
> > ls -li /backups/cpool/1/5/c/15c0e4b08058ef3704b8fc24887e2bcc
> > /backups/pc/foo--tm50-e00145--tm50-s00339---shared/47/f%2f/fshared/ffoo/fpurchase_order_assets/fbatch_7813/f7105620_done.txt
> >
> > *BUT*. Not linked.
Robin,
> ls -li /backups/cpool/1/5/c/15c0e4b08058ef3704b8fc24887e2bcc
> /backups/pc/foo--tm50-e00145--tm50-s00339---shared/47/f%2f/fshared/ffoo/fpurchase_order_assets/fbatch_7813/f7105620_done.txt
>
> *BUT*. Not linked.
>
> $ ls -li /backups/cpool/1/5/c/15c0e4b08058ef3704b8fc24887e2bcc
> /bac
On Mon, Dec 06, 2010 at 01:17:43PM -0800, Robin Lee Powell wrote:
>
> So, yeah. More than one link, matches something in the pool, but
> not actually linked to it. Isn't that *awesome*? ;'(
>
> I very much want BackupPC_fixLinks to deal with this, and I'm
> trying to modify it to do that now.
On Mon, Dec 06, 2010 at 03:48:04PM -0500, Jeffrey J. Kosowsky wrote:
> Robin Lee Powell wrote at about 10:37:52 -0800 on Monday, December 6, 2010:
> >
> > So I'm writing a script to transfer a client from one host to
> > another, using tarPCCopy, and I'm getting messages like this:
> >
> >
On Mon, Dec 06, 2010 at 03:48:04PM -0500, Jeffrey J. Kosowsky wrote:
> Robin Lee Powell wrote at about 10:37:52 -0800 on Monday, December 6, 2010:
> >
> > So I'm writing a script to transfer a client from one host to
> > another, using tarPCCopy, and I'm getting messages like this:
> >
> >
Robin Lee Powell wrote at about 10:37:52 -0800 on Monday, December 6, 2010:
>
> So I'm writing a script to transfer a client from one host to
> another, using tarPCCopy, and I'm getting messages like this:
>
> Can't find
> foo--tm50-e00145--tm50-s00339---shared/47/f%2f/fshared/ffoo/fpurc
On Mon, Dec 06, 2010 at 10:37:52AM -0800, Robin Lee Powell wrote:
>
> So I'm writing a script to transfer a client from one host to
> another, using tarPCCopy, and I'm getting messages like this:
>
> Can't find
> foo--tm50-e00145--tm50-s00339---shared/47/f%2f/fshared/ffoo/fpurchase_order_asset
So I'm writing a script to transfer a client from one host to
another, using tarPCCopy, and I'm getting messages like this:
Can't find
foo--tm50-e00145--tm50-s00339---shared/47/f%2f/fshared/ffoo/fpurchase_order_assets/fbatch_7813/f7105620_done.txt
in pool, will copy file
which is fascinating
24 matches
Mail list logo
