Craig-
On Mon, Aug 14, 2017 at 11:54 AM, Craig Barratt via BackupPC-users <
backuppc-users@lists.sourceforge.net> wrote:
> Ray,
>
> The behavior you are seeing is expected for tar (and smb and ftp)
> XferMethods. Incrementals don't detect deleted or renamed files. So if
> you have a directory
Ray,
The behavior you are seeing is expected for tar (and smb and ftp)
XferMethods. Incrementals don't detect deleted or renamed files. So if
you have a directory with lots of changes, incrementals will backup the new
files (and any prior files with recent mtimes), and the "view" of the
backup w
Craig-
Thanks for taking a look at this.
On Sun, Aug 13, 2017 at 8:06 PM, Craig Barratt via BackupPC-users <
backuppc-users@lists.sourceforge.net> wrote:
> Ray,
>
> What is the XferMethod and backup schedule (ie, how often do you do
> incrementals and fulls)? Which backup are you viewing (ie,
Ray,
What is the XferMethod and backup schedule (ie, how often do you do
incrementals and fulls)? Which backup are you viewing (ie, how many
incrementals need to be merged to view it)? Are you running v3 or v4?
Two options are to:
- use BackupPC_ls so you can see the backup tree using the c
This is a two part question/problem report.
We backup a file system that has a sub-directory that generally contains
around 39K small files that usually adds up to 16GB. The files see a fair
amount of churn month to month, and we were pulling from a backup about 2
weeks ago.
When we try to brow
