Re: [BackupPC-users] Hardware choices for a BackupPC server

2007-03-15 Thread Harry Mangalam
This is but a single data point, but if others can provide some additional data, it might help you triangulate what you want. I'd also recommend 3ware over Areca - I've had 2 bad experiences with Areca involving data loss - only one of which I could really blame on the controller, but 3ware

[BackupPC-users] Hardware choices for a BackupPC server

2007-03-14 Thread John Pettitt
It's time to build a new server. My old one (a re-purposed Celeron D 2.9Ghz / 768M FreeBSD box with a a 1.5 TB raid on a Highpoint card) has hit a wall in both performance and capacity. gstat on FreeBSD shows me that the Highpoint raid array is the main bottleneck (partly because it's in a

Re: [BackupPC-users] Hardware choices for a BackupPC server

2007-03-14 Thread Jason Hughes
John, IMO, the point behind BackupPC is to use cheap, easily upgradeable disk media to make backups available and easy. That kind of steers me in the direction of several low-end backup servers, either with separate storage or all sharing a big fat fiber channel NAS. Buying a high end

Re: [BackupPC-users] Hardware choices for a BackupPC server

2007-03-14 Thread Jim McNamara
I agree with what Jason wrote, particularly in regards to a 3ware controller. I also like reiserfs, but for 1.5 Tb a strong case could be made for XFS or JFS, depending on your standard issues like many small files in the backup, or fewer larger files. I would also consider raid 5 or 6. Nothing