On Fri, Apr 01, 2011 at 10:59:17AM -0400, nhoel...@sinet.ca wrote:
> On 2011-03-31 15:47 John Rouillard wrote:
> > The only way the March 30'th backup wouldn't have transferred the
> > files was if the march 29th backup was a level 1 incremental and the
> > march 30'th was a level 2 incremental. In
On 2011-03-31 14:58 John Rouillard wrote:
> Having myself spent a few weeks getting it all working on a plug
computer,
> did you make sure to correct *both* bugs that I found and posted to
> the archive?
John, I reviewed the two issues at
http://www.adsm.org/lists/html/BackupPC-users/2011-01/m
On 2011-03-31 15:47 John Rouillard wrote:
> The only way the March 30'th backup wouldn't have transferred the
> files was if the march 29th backup was a level 1 incremental and the
> march 30'th was a level 2 incremental. In that case the march 30'th
> incrementals reference tree would have been f
On Thu, Mar 31, 2011 at 09:59:43AM -0400, nhoel...@sinet.ca wrote:
> I am running backuppc 3.1.0-4 on a plug computer (ARM processor) with the
> Perl rsync fix for ARM processors. On March 24, backuppc did an
> incremental backup that picked up two 350MB files which had been uploaded
> to my we
nhoel...@sinet.ca wrote at about 09:59:43 -0400 on Thursday, March 31, 2011:
> I am running backuppc 3.1.0-4 on a plug computer (ARM processor) with the
> Perl rsync fix for ARM processors. On March 24, backuppc did an
> incremental backup that picked up two 350MB files which had been uploade
I am running backuppc 3.1.0-4 on a plug computer (ARM processor) with the
Perl rsync fix for ARM processors. On March 24, backuppc did an
incremental backup that picked up two 350MB files which had been uploaded
to my web server. On March,25, backuppc did a full backup and indicated
that the f
