On 3/3/2010 8:37 AM, Mike Bydalek wrote:
> I hate bring this up again, but after taking advice from Les and John,
> I'm not seeing what I think I should be seeing. After changing my
> current config to the one below, I started to have incr, incr, full,
> incr, incr, full, but the full's were doing
Mike Bydalek wrote:
> I hate bring this up again, but after taking advice from Les and John,
> I'm not seeing what I think I should be seeing. After changing my
> current config to the one below, I started to have incr, incr, full,
> incr, incr, full, but the full's were doing the entire 600G.
>
>
I hate bring this up again, but after taking advice from Les and John,
I'm not seeing what I think I should be seeing. After changing my
current config to the one below, I started to have incr, incr, full,
incr, incr, full, but the full's were doing the entire 600G.
Here's what I have for my Host
On Fri, Feb 19, 2010 at 9:53 AM, Timothy J Massey wrote:
> Mike Bydalek wrote on 02/19/2010
> 11:28:25 AM:
>
>> Thanks for all the input. I'm starting to fully understand how
>> BackupPC scheduling is working now. My apologies for not stating that
>> I was/am using rsync as it is the only choic
Mike Bydalek wrote on 02/19/2010
11:28:25 AM:
> Thanks for all the input. I'm starting to fully understand how
> BackupPC scheduling is working now. My apologies for not stating that
> I was/am using rsync as it is the only choice that makes sense =)
In which case, after your first (potential
All,
Thanks for all the input. I'm starting to fully understand how
BackupPC scheduling is working now. My apologies for not stating that
I was/am using rsync as it is the only choice that makes sense =)
On Fri, Feb 19, 2010 at 12:15 AM, Craig Barratt
wrote:
> Mike,
>
>> Backup# Type
Mike,
> Backup# TypeComp Level Size/MB Comp/MB Comp
> Size/MB Comp/MB Comp
> 0 full3 78446.6 45871.8 41.5% 258032.2
> 155715.639.7%
> 2 incr3 276482.0165123.840.3%
Mike Bydalek wrote on 02/18/2010
08:06:15 PM:
> After re-reading the documentation for {IncrLevels} again the
> configuration settings are starting to make sense. The only question
> I have left is, does creating a new "full" backup *have* to do the
> entire full backup again? Can't it just pe
Mike Bydalek wrote:
>
>
> After re-reading the documentation for {IncrLevels} again the
> configuration settings are starting to make sense. The only question
> I have left is, does creating a new "full" backup *have* to do the
> entire full backup again? Can't it just perform an increment and
On Thu, Feb 18, 2010 at 06:06:15PM -0700, Mike Bydalek wrote:
> On Thu, Feb 18, 2010 at 12:04 PM, John Rouillard
> wrote:
> > On Thu, Feb 18, 2010 at 07:51:13AM -0700, Mike Bydalek wrote:
> >> My question is, why did backups 13 and 14 backup all that data? Same
> >> with 2 and 7 for that matter.
I can speak from experience on the matter of a slow link back to the
backuppc server. We have mutliple sites that we backup to a central
backuppc server. 2 of the sites have a 256k upload and 2 others are
T1's. The only issue is getting the initial full. What I did on the 2
local (256k) sites is ta
On Thu, Feb 18, 2010 at 12:04 PM, John Rouillard
wrote:
> On Thu, Feb 18, 2010 at 07:51:13AM -0700, Mike Bydalek wrote:
>> My question is, why did backups 13 and 14 backup all that data? Same
>> with 2 and 7 for that matter.
>
> What level are your incremental backups? if backup 2 was at level 1
On Thu, Feb 18, 2010 at 07:51:13AM -0700, Mike Bydalek wrote:
> Recently I've started using BackupPC to backup my file server and am
> seeing some things that just don't quite make much sense. Lately
> backups have been taking quite some time, in fact the current one
> started on 2/16 @ 11pm and i
Hello.
Recently I've started using BackupPC to backup my file server and am
seeing some things that just don't quite make much sense. Lately
backups have been taking quite some time, in fact the current one
started on 2/16 @ 11pm and is still running. I do have a lot of data,
around 330G, but no
14 matches
Mail list logo
