[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I routinely hit 100% CPU utilization on the Via C3 1GHz Mini-ITX
systems I use as backup servers. I will grant you that the C3 is not
the most efficient processor, but I am definitely CPU-limited. I too
have 512MB RAM, but the machines are not swapping. And that's
On 1/2/07, Jason Hughes [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Good recommendations, Holger. I would add that niceing a process only
changes its scheduling affinity, but does not modify in any way its hard
disk activity or DMA priority, so until the original poster understands
what exactly makes the server
Holger Parplies wrote:
Paul Harmor wrote on 01.01.2007 at 20:51:43 [[BackupPC-users] OK, how about
changing the server's backuppc process niceness?]:
I have only 2 machines (at the moment) being backed up, but every time
the backups start, the server system slows to an UNUSEABLE crawl
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
I'm running a 1.3Gig Duron, 512 DDR, LVM and 2x160GB drives, on Ubuntu 6.10.
I have only 2 machines (at the moment) being backed up, but every time
the backups start, the server system slows to an UNUSEABLE crawl, until
I can, slowly, start top, and
Paul Harmor wrote:
I'm running a 1.3Gig Duron, 512 DDR, LVM and 2x160GB drives, on Ubuntu 6.10.
I have only 2 machines (at the moment) being backed up, but every time
the backups start, the server system slows to an UNUSEABLE crawl, until
I can, slowly, start top, and renice the 4 backuppc
Hi (or ok, hi),
Paul Harmor wrote on 01.01.2007 at 20:51:43 [[BackupPC-users] OK, how about
changing the server's backuppc process niceness?]:
I'm running a 1.3Gig Duron, 512 DDR, LVM and 2x160GB drives, on Ubuntu 6.10.
while that's a nice start and possibly hints at a memory bottleneck
