On Mon, September 4, 2006 19:32, Les Mikesell wrote:
> On Mon, 2006-09-04 at 02:15, Sturla Holm Hansen wrote:
>
>> There are absolutely no difference in the output from "stat somesymlink"
>> before and after I have done "rm somesymlink; ln -s somepath ." where
>> the
>> somepath is the same as was
On Mon, 2006-09-04 at 02:15, Sturla Holm Hansen wrote:
> There are absolutely no difference in the output from "stat somesymlink"
> before and after I have done "rm somesymlink; ln -s somepath ." where the
> somepath is the same as was reported from stat before I deleted the old
> symlink, it just
On Sat, September 2, 2006 05:20, Craig Barratt wrote:
> Sturla writes:
>
>> I restored to the same directory as the backup was taken from and the
>> symlinks LOOK ok when I stat them, but they just won't work.
>> If I delete the symlink and create it again with the info from stat it
>> works, but
Sturla writes:
> I restored to the same directory as the backup was taken from and the
> symlinks LOOK ok when I stat them, but they just won't work.
> If I delete the symlink and create it again with the info from stat it
> works, but it's kinda tedious doing this on every symlink.
> I tried to w
On Wed, August 30, 2006 11:22, Craig Barratt wrote:
> Sturla writes:
>
>> Hi there list.
>> I've been using backuppc for quite a while and am extremely happy with
>> it
>> so far, but..
>> I had to do a full restore of my web/mail-server the other day and had a
>> nasty surprise when all symlinks w
Sturla writes:
> Hi there list.
> I've been using backuppc for quite a while and am extremely happy with it
> so far, but..
> I had to do a full restore of my web/mail-server the other day and had a
> nasty surprise when all symlinks where restored but dangling...
> They looked all righ, they seem
Hi there list.
I've been using backuppc for quite a while and am extremely happy with it
so far, but..
I had to do a full restore of my web/mail-server the other day and had a
nasty surprise when all symlinks where restored but dangling...
They looked all righ, they seemed to be pointing to the rig
