Paul Fox wrote:
Gregor Schmid <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Is there anything special to consider when upgrading from 2.1 to 3.0?
I found very little on the net and in the docs, I guess that implies
that configure.pl is working just fine.
it works very well. for those of us not fluent in perl,
Gregor Schmid <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Is there anything special to consider when upgrading from 2.1 to 3.0?
> I found very little on the net and in the docs, I guess that implies
> that configure.pl is working just fine.
it works very well. for those of us not fluent in perl, the hardest
Thanks a lot Craig, then I guess it's time to upgrade... :-)
Is there anything special to consider when upgrading from 2.1 to 3.0?
I found very little on the net and in the docs, I guess that implies
that configure.pl is working just fine.
I'll give it a try.
Thanks and best regards,
Greg
Gregor writes:
> and related messages for background information. In his final mail on
> that thread, Craig said
>
> > Upon further inspection, it turns out the rsync XferMethod
> > doesn't check the hardlink limit when it is linking to
> > an identical file. So there are two cases you have foun
Gregor Schmid wrote:
> The "solution" of excluding .svn directories from backups, as
> mentioned in the previous discussion, is not acceptable for me as SVN
> working copies are among the most valuable stuff we're backing up...
If your work is committed (which is kind of the point of using svn...
Hi,
I'm using BackupPC 2.1.3 and am mostly very happy with it. But now I'm
running into the "too many links" problem with large subversion
directories. Please see
http://www.arcknowledge.com/gmane.comp.sysutils.backup.backuppc.general/2005-03/msg00145.html
and related messages for background in
