On Tue, Sep 22, 2015 at 3:06 PM, Bob of Donelson Trophy <
b...@donelsontrophy.net> wrote:
> And you may be correct. I remember reading somewhere that one of the
> issues Apache 2.4 handles differently than Apache 2.2 is external access.
> And I searched for that information again and could not
Les,
What I was trying to say (and not very well) is that I was having
trouble finding the answers I needed. I had to get the backup server up
and running so I abandon the C7 version and reverted to C6.7 hoping
someday there will be a simple upgrade soon . . . as in next year or
maybe the
On Mon, Sep 21, 2015 at 3:39 PM, Timothy Murphy wrote:
> On Monday 21 September 2015 12:11:39 Bob of Donelson Trophy wrote:
>
>> Regarding my permissions issue. I have really begun to think that CentOS
>> 7 is a little too new for this particular installation.
>
> I'm not
On Tue, Sep 22, 2015 at 2:20 PM, Brad Alexander wrote:
>
>
> On Tue, Sep 22, 2015 at 3:06 PM, Bob of Donelson Trophy
> wrote:
>>
>> And you may be correct. I remember reading somewhere that one of the
>> issues Apache 2.4 handles differently than
Hi,
Les Mikesell wrote on 2015-09-22 14:30:34 -0500 [Re: [BackupPC-users] Forbidden
You don't have permission to access /BackupPC on this server.]:
> On Tue, Sep 22, 2015 at 2:20 PM, Brad Alexander <stor...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > [...]
> > I don't know that that is the ca
Hi,
Stefan Peter wrote on 2015-09-21 20:20:44 +0200 [Re: [BackupPC-users] Forbidden
You don't have permission to access /BackupPC on this server.]:
> Dear Bob of Donelson Trophy
>
> Please find my comments interspersed below:
> (this is the stanza I use for noobs)
[this is wor
First, I have trimmed out the irrelevant rhetoric.
To the nicer people on this list, with your help, I have moved on.
If you read all the threads of my original post, Stefan Peter was the
first to get way off topic.
Then, whether appropriate or not, Holger Parplies uses this off topic
On Tue, Sep 22, 2015 at 5:48 PM, Timothy Murphy wrote:
> On Tuesday 22 September 2015 14:30:34 Les Mikesell wrote:
>> On Tue, Sep 22, 2015 at 2:20 PM, Brad Alexander wrote:
>
>> I didn't mean there was a problem running 2.4, just that if you put
>>
On Tue, Sep 22, 2015 at 3:26 PM, Holger Parplies <wb...@parplies.de> wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Les Mikesell wrote on 2015-09-22 14:30:34 -0500 [Re: [BackupPC-users]
> Forbidden You don't have permission to access /BackupPC on this server.]:
>> On Tue, Sep 22, 2015 at 2:20
On Tuesday 22 September 2015 14:30:34 Les Mikesell wrote:
> On Tue, Sep 22, 2015 at 2:20 PM, Brad Alexander wrote:
> I didn't mean there was a problem running 2.4, just that if you put
> 'Require Local'
> which I believe was in the other config posted, clients other than
>
Do you actually have selinux in enforcing mode?
If so, I would have thought it would be sensible to turn it to permissive,
until the BackupPC problem is solved.
> So I have decided to start again with CentOS 6.7.
I'm reasonably certain if you applied all the suggestions that have been made
On Sunday 20 September 2015 18:18:21 Bob of Donelson Trophy wrote:
> Yes, you are correct. I tried "apache" and "backuppc" groups and nothing
> changed. (It is suppose to be backuppc:apache by most accounts I am
> reading.)
Can you try to access BackupPC from the server on which it is running,
First, my only comment on top posting.
Here in the states most email clients default to top posting. Therefore,
if I set my defaults to bottom post (as requested but not mandatory by
all mailing list I participate in) my US customers (who, grant you, are
NOT logical and think email should be
On Mon, Sep 21, 2015 at 7:03 AM, Bob of Donelson Trophy
wrote:
> First, my only comment on top posting.
>
> Here in the states most email clients default to top posting. Therefore, if
> I set my defaults to bottom post (as requested but not mandatory by all
> mailing list
I really do not want to talk about top posting and the all the reasons I
have little choice in the matter . . . please.
Regarding my permissions issue. I have really begun to think that CentOS
7 is a little too new for this particular installation. I am still
learning about selinux and it's
I just finished installing C6.7 and BackuppPC 3.3.1. It went like a
charm. Getting ready to take the machine to it's final home.
I am not complaining but the documentation always lags (with any distro)
and the issues I was having with C7 are most likely related to the newer
systemd, selinux
In both cases (6, 7), your easiest path of installation is probably to just
hook into EPEL repositories and install BackupPC (3.3.1) via yum.
Certainly a lot easier than finding and installing dependencies manually.
I'm in a similar dilemma with regards to CentOS 7 upgrades, but I figure I
have 5
Dear Bob of Donelson Trophy
Please find my comments interspersed below:
(this is the stanza I use for noobs)
On 21.09.2015 14:03, Bob of Donelson Trophy wrote:
> First, my only comment on top posting.
>
> Here in the states most email clients default to top posting. Therefore,
> if I set my
On Monday 21 September 2015 12:11:39 Bob of Donelson Trophy wrote:
> Regarding my permissions issue. I have really begun to think that CentOS
> 7 is a little too new for this particular installation.
I'm not sure what this means - you seem to have installed BackupPC OK.
> I am still
> learning
On Monday 21 September 2015 12:06:02 Kris Lou wrote:
> In both cases (6, 7), your easiest path of installation is probably to just
> hook into EPEL repositories and install BackupPC (3.3.1) via yum.
> Certainly a lot easier than finding and installing dependencies manually.
>
> I'm in a similar
Not familiar with running backuppc on centos. Is there a backuppc group
that your user has to be a member of?
On Sun, Sep 20, 2015 at 3:23 PM, Bob of Donelson Trophy <
b...@donelsontrophy.net> wrote:
> Yes, yes, and yes to all three questions.
>
>
> ---
>
> ___
>
>
Tried your suggestion . . . made no difference.
Thanks.
---
___
Bob Wooden of Donelson Trophy
615.885.2846
www.donelsontrophy.com [1]
"Everyone deserves an award!!"
On 2015-09-20 08:07, Mark Maciolek wrote:
> hi,
>
> Make sute the BackupPC.conf in
Yes, you are correct. I tried "apache" and "backuppc" groups and nothing
changed. (It is suppose to be backuppc:apache by most accounts I am
reading.)
---
___
Bob Wooden of Donelson Trophy
615.885.2846
www.donelsontrophy.com [1]
"Everyone deserves an award!!"
On 21/09/15 09:18, Bob of Donelson Trophy wrote:
On 2015-09-20 08:38, Timothy Murphy wrote:
Bob of Donelson Trophy wrote:
I have been using BackupPC for years on an Ubuntu/Debian
OS. I am switching to CentOS 7 and cannot figure out why
I am
Bob of Donelson Trophy wrote:
> I have been using BackupPC for years on an Ubuntu/Debian OS. I am
> switching to CentOS 7 and cannot figure out why I am getting the
> following:
>
> FORBIDDEN
>
> You don't have permission to access /BackupPC on this server.
>
> . . . . when I
hi,
Make sute the BackupPC.conf in /etc/httpd/conf.d has this line in it:
Require all granted
Marlk
On 9/20/2015 8:42 AM, Bob of Donelson Trophy wrote:
I have been using BackupPC for years on an Ubuntu/Debian OS. I am
switching to CentOS 7 and cannot figure out why I am getting the
26 matches
Mail list logo