Kern Sibbald wrote:
> Hello,
>
> I don't remember getting any feedback from you concerning my comments on this
> proposal.
Hi Kern.
I wrote back saying that I may have underestimated that Bacula was smart enough
to avoid using the same volume.
So I removed my hack to mark tapes as USED to see h
I've got three patches here.
One to examples/nagios:
--- prepare_for_check_bacula.old2009-11-29 23:20:26.375334590
+0100
+++ prepare_for_check_bacula2009-11-29 23:29:44.726534601 +0100
@@ -10,7 +10,7 @@
mv -uiv configure configure.without_check_bacula
# Modify ./configure
-sed -
On Sunday 29 November 2009 18:28:35 SF Markus Elfring wrote:
> > Look at the diff or try compiling it. It should be rather obvious.
>
> Would you like to show me the error message from your software environment?
> (I checked the syntax on my system before submission. Do we stumble on
> unexpected
> Look at the diff or try compiling it. It should be rather obvious.
Would you like to show me the error message from your software environment?
(I checked the syntax on my system before submission. Do we stumble on
unexpected differences?)
> > Do you mean the proposed specification "AC_INIT([
On Sunday 29 November 2009 15:51:39 SF Markus Elfring wrote:
> > However, I am not too keen on these kinds of submissions, because it is a
> > rather significant change with little or no benefit.
>
> Do you agree to any open issues that I mentioned in the bug report?
> http://bugs.bacula.org/view.p
> However, I am not too keen on these kinds of submissions, because it is a
> rather significant change with little or no benefit.
Do you agree to any open issues that I mentioned in the bug report?
http://bugs.bacula.org/view.php?id=1415
> That is it doesn't correct any real problem, and these
On Saturday 28 November 2009 15:38:36 Ralf Gross wrote:
> Kern Sibbald schrieb:
> > > [...]
> > > Anyone else here with the same problem? Anyone (maybe Kern or Eric)
> > > here that can tell if one of the upcoming new bacula features (dedup?)
> > > could help to solve the problem with the massive a
On Sunday 29 November 2009 12:13:22 SF Markus Elfring wrote:
> > I haven't seen a patch, so I have no other comment.
>
> I find this reply strange. I repeat my update suggestion from the bug
> report "Open issues in the configuration script"
> (http://bugs.bacula.org/view.php?id=1415) once again as
On Sunday 29 November 2009 12:00:36 SF Markus Elfring wrote:
> > However, I am not very interested in being pedantic and "correcting"
> > things that are not impacting us or creating more work for the
> > developers.
>
> Would you like to give me an indication that a source code clean-up for
> safe
> However, I am not very interested in being pedantic and "correcting" things
> that are not impacting us or creating more work for the developers.
Would you like to give me an indication that a source code clean-up for safer
names will be an acceptable contribution for software refactoring?
Re
I am sorry, but your suggestions are not very useful for our project at this
point.
If you want to contribute, please send something concrete (a patch for a bug
or an implementation of a feature in the projects file) rather than sending
me homework to do.
Regards,
Kern
On Sunday 29 November
On Sunday 29 November 2009 09:14:57 SF Markus Elfring wrote:
> > I haven't seen any proposed patch.
>
> How do you think about the update suggestion from the bug report "Open
> issues in the configuration script"?
> http://bugs.bacula.org/file_download.php?file_id=1152&type=bug
>
I repeat. I haven
On Sunday 29 November 2009 08:57:36 SF Markus Elfring wrote:
> > > I suggest to change some identifiers that begin with two underscores or
> > > an underscore and an uppercase letter. - How do you think about to use
> > > the prefix "BACULA_" (instead of "_B") consistently?
> >
> > No, it is too cl
> I am not interested in using AspectC++. It is just one more concern for
> porting and at this point in time will consume time for "cleanup" when we
> need all the time we can get for "implementation"
I suggest to raise the abstraction level.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Abstraction_%28compute
> I haven't seen any proposed patch.
How do you think about the update suggestion from the bug report "Open issues
in the configuration script"?
http://bugs.bacula.org/file_download.php?file_id=1152&type=bug
Regards,
Markus
---
> > I suggest to change some identifiers that begin with two underscores or an
> > underscore and an uppercase letter. - How do you think about to use the
> > prefix "BACULA_" (instead of "_B") consistently?
>
> No, it is too clumbsy in my opinion.
I prefer the correct application of the C namin
16 matches
Mail list logo
