Re: [Bacula-devel] Bad storage messages

2009-11-13 Thread wvoice
First of all, sorry for the double post. That was unintentional. I figured out what was the primary culprit. The dns name wasn't resolving on the client. Once that was fixed everything worked fine. wvoice wrote: > > Hi, > > I've got 13 clients connected to my ba

[Bacula-devel] Bad storage messages

2009-11-08 Thread wvoice
Hi, I've got 13 clients connected to my bacula server and so far they've been running great. This includes a mix of 32-bit and 64-bit Windows 2003 and Windows 2008 servers. However, I've got two servers in particular that are not backing up at all. They're both Windows 2008 running in Hyper-V.

[Bacula-devel] Bad storage messages

2009-11-08 Thread wvoice
I've got 13 clients connected to my bacula server and so far they've been running great. This includes a mix of 32-bit and 64-bit Windows 2003 and Windows 2008 servers. However, I've got two servers in particular that are not backing up at all. They're both Windows 2008 running in Hyper-V. Status

Re: [Bacula-devel] Base jobs

2009-11-04 Thread wvoice
ig files are gonna be different too, at least the contents will be. Anyway, I wanted to let you know before wasting your time. Thanks! wvoice wrote: > > Hi, > > I'm trying to test out the dedupe between several base jobs I've listed as > windemo1, windemo2, and windemo

Re: [Bacula-devel] Base jobs

2009-11-04 Thread wvoice
aking this go away? It's referencing source that's apparently on your box and not in the git. Thanks! wvoice wrote: > > Hi, > > I'm trying to test out the dedupe between several base jobs I've listed as > windemo1, windemo2, and windemo3. > > I've l

Re: [Bacula-devel] Base jobs

2009-11-02 Thread wvoice
de the changes you've suggested and am now running the new jobs. It will take a while to complete. Thanks! wvoice wrote: > > Hi, > > I'm trying to test out the dedupe between several base jobs I've listed as > windemo1, windemo2, and windemo3. > > I'

Re: [Bacula-devel] Base jobs

2009-11-02 Thread wvoice
} File = c:/ } Exclude { File = File = File = File = File = File = } } FileSet { Name = "windemo2" Include { Options { signature = MD5 } File = c:/ } Exclude { File = File = File = File = File =

Re: [Bacula-devel] Base jobs

2009-10-31 Thread wvoice
ll be back Sunday evening or Monday morning, so if you want to > test > the base code, I am sure he will help you get a copy. > > Regards, > > Kern > > On Saturday 31 October 2009 17:48:05 wvoice wrote: >> Hi, >> >> I'm trying to test out the dedupe

[Bacula-devel] Base jobs

2009-10-31 Thread wvoice
Hi, I'm trying to test out the dedupe between several base jobs I've listed as windemo1, windemo2, and windemo3. I've listed the type of job as Base. And all is well when I reload my config. However, the problem arises when I try to declare what to compare the base jobs between. For example in

Re: [Bacula-devel] Re commended Windows build platform

2009-09-09 Thread wvoice
:) You're a good man Graham! That's what I've done too. Now I just need to fix NSIS to complete things. Graham Keeling wrote: > > On Wed, Sep 09, 2009 at 06:19:47AM -0700, wvoice wrote: >> >> I'm actually trying to figure where things are breaking.

Re: [Bacula-devel] Re commended Windows build platform

2009-09-09 Thread wvoice
\n! Make of win32_installer failed !\n\n Graham Keeling wrote: > > On Tue, Sep 08, 2009 at 06:19:03PM -0700, wvoice wrote: >> Things are now bailing on the final Makefile in ../newinstaller/Makefile. > > As I undestand it (looking at bacula-3.0.2), it doesn't use things

Re: [Bacula-devel] Re commended Windows build platform

2009-09-09 Thread wvoice
o a make there? I'm not yet seeing anything in the top level Makefile that passes that path. Then again, I could be grepping for the wrong variables there. Graham Keeling wrote: > > On Wed, Sep 09, 2009 at 06:05:01AM -0700, wvoice wrote: >> And as far as running the commands, I

Re: [Bacula-devel] Re commended Windows build platform

2009-09-09 Thread wvoice
ails that way. And simply doing symbolic links fails. Renaming the directories is necessary. Kern Sibbald wrote: > > On Wednesday 09 September 2009 03:19:03 wvoice wrote: >> Hi Graham, >> >> That definitely solved that problem. I feel as if I'm in the home stretch >

Re: [Bacula-devel] Re commended Windows build platform

2009-09-08 Thread wvoice
istine git clone. Thanks, Mike Graham Keeling wrote: > > On Sat, Sep 05, 2009 at 07:05:01AM -0700, wvoice wrote: >> Here's what I'm getting: >> >> Patching binutils >> ./build-win32-cross-

Re: [Bacula-devel] Re commended Windows build platform

2009-09-05 Thread wvoice
essional help (sorry, but that is $$). > > If you want to test version 3.0.3, and you need a Win32 build, let us > know. > We can build and post them from time to time. > > Good luck, > > Kern > > On Saturday 05 September 2009 16:05:01 wvoice wrote: >> Hi Ker

Re: [Bacula-devel] Re commended Windows build platform

2009-09-05 Thread wvoice
[all-bfd] Error 2 make: *** [all] Error 2 make of binutils failed - log available: binutils-mingw32/make.log I'm not seeing anything useful in make.log. Thoughts? I'm trying to generate the windows FD so I can start testing out 3.0.3. Thanks, Mike Kern Sibbald wrote: > > On Fri

Re: [Bacula-devel] Re commended Windows build platform

2009-09-04 Thread wvoice
Thanks Kern! Kern Sibbald wrote: > > On Friday 04 September 2009 16:29:58 wvoice wrote: >> Hi, >> >> I'm still having issues trying to build the Windows binaries for 3.0.2 >> and >> 3.0.3 on SLES. Is there a recommended OS and version that the core &

Re: [Bacula-devel] Bacula file daemon package builder for Mac OS X

2009-09-04 Thread wvoice
Lorenz Schori wrote: > > Are there any OSX guys who like to join forces? Feedback (and spelling > corrections) always very welcome. > I would definitely like to work with you on the OSX side of things. -Mike -- View this message in context: http://www.nabble.com/Bacula-file-daemon-package

[Bacula-devel] Re commended Windows build platform

2009-09-04 Thread wvoice
Hi, I'm still having issues trying to build the Windows binaries for 3.0.2 and 3.0.3 on SLES. Is there a recommended OS and version that the core developers are using? Thanks, Mike -- View this message in context: http://www.nabble.com/Recommended-Windows-build-platform-tp25295428p25295428.ht