[Bacula-users] FW: Bacula GDB traceback of bacula-dir

2005-08-25 Thread Sherwood McGowan
Here's a crash I get almost every day... Bacula 1.36, CentOS 4 -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, August 25, 2005 6:30 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Bacula GDB traceback of bacula-dir Using host libthread_db library "/lib/libthrea

Re: [Bacula-users] Re: [Bacula-devel] Bacula status

2005-08-25 Thread Ludovic Strappazon
Hi, I agree with Arno. There's also something wich hurts me : a small company with ~ 2 servers and 10 workstation would pay 100 $, and a General Electric, for example, would pay only 500 $ ! Well, 100 $ is given compared to commercial software, but it is not equitable in my opinion. With th

Re: [Bacula-users] Questions about this tape drive...?

2005-08-25 Thread Arno Lehmann
Hi, pedro moreno wrote: Hi people. I want to test one backup server with bacula, but i dont see this tape drive on the bacula supported drivers and unsupported. But maybe someone has no problem working with this tape: Seagate STD224000N Today, that's Certance ;-) DDS3 drive. SCS

Re: [Bacula-users] Re: Open Source Funding idea (Kern Sibbald)

2005-08-25 Thread Neil Schneider
Kern Sibbald said: > Although BSD and other licenses are free for commercial users, I > wouldn't say > that is the case for GPL. For a commercial software company as > opposed to a > service company, GPL is somewhat of a nightmare. It is true they > don't have > to pay for it, but it comes at a

[Bacula-users] Questions about this tape drive...?

2005-08-25 Thread pedro moreno
Hi people. I want to test one backup server with bacula, but i dont see this tape drive on the bacula supported drivers and unsupported. But maybe someone has no problem working with this tape: Seagate STD224000N I want to run on Freebsd or Linux and want to know if some has this t

Re: [Bacula-users] Re: Open Source Funding idea (Kern Sibbald)

2005-08-25 Thread Kern Sibbald
On Thursday 25 August 2005 22:35, Philipp Steinkrueger wrote: > Hi Kern, > > > you can see this development at several places throughout the OpenSource > scene. Could you tell me where? It is a rather obvious concept, but I haven't seen anything really quite the same. I'd be interested to se

Re: [Bacula-users] bacula.db-journal?

2005-08-25 Thread Arno Lehmann
Hi, Doug Sampson wrote: If I'm right, you can a) safely ignore the message, or b) exclude this file from the backup. This not only gets rid of the message, it also saves space because this file would be useless to restore. If you've got a catalog backup, of course. How do I prevent Bacula

[Bacula-users] Re: Open Source Funding idea (Kern Sibbald)

2005-08-25 Thread Philipp Steinkrueger
Hi Kern, you can see this development at several places throughout the OpenSource scene. actually i cant see any difference between this licence concept which asks you to buy a licence if you want to make profit with the software and "classical" commercial software which also allows private user

RE: [Bacula-users] bacula.db-journal?

2005-08-25 Thread Doug Sampson
> If I'm right, you can > a) safely ignore the message, or > b) exclude this file from the backup. This not only gets rid of the > message, it also saves space because this file would be useless to > restore. If you've got a catalog backup, of course. How do I prevent Bacula from trying to 'stat

RE: [Bacula-users] Excludes not working?

2005-08-25 Thread j2
> regexfile = "/var/log/.*\.[0-9]\.gz" > >My guess (and it's only a guess) is that '.*' won't match a '/'; >you'll need to specify the depth, e.g., > > regexfile = "/var/log/.*\.[0-9]\.gz" > regexfile = "/var/log/.*/.*\.[0-9]\.gz" Oh, that makes sense. Maybe I need a regexp that matches

Re: [Bacula-users] Excludes not working?

2005-08-25 Thread Paul Heinlein
On Thu, 25 Aug 2005, j2 wrote: With the below fileset, I thought all gzipped logs would be excluded from my backup, but as shown at the bottom of the post, they are not? [] regexfile = "/var/log/.*\.[0-9]\.gz" My guess (and it's only a guess) is that '.*' won't match a '/'; you'll

[Bacula-users] Excludes not working?

2005-08-25 Thread j2
With the below fileset, I thought all gzipped logs would be excluded from my backup, but as shown at the bottom of the post, they are not?   FileSet {   Name = "Full Set"   Include {     Options {   signature = MD5   Exclude = yes   wildfile = *.MYI   wildfile = *.M

Re: [Bacula-users] Spools less than configured

2005-08-25 Thread Kern Sibbald
On Thursday 25 August 2005 16:52, Alan Brown wrote: > On Thu, 25 Aug 2005, Kern Sibbald wrote: > > Under 1.37, I have "unified" the naming convention of all Bacula > > temporary files so that it will be easy to know which ones are used for > > what (the use is always postfixed -- e.g. .spool, .mail

Re: [Bacula-users] Problems restoring large(?) files

2005-08-25 Thread Kern Sibbald
On Thursday 25 August 2005 15:34, Tom Boyda wrote: > Kern, > > Thank you for a very nice program. > > I am using MySQL 4.0.14 with 2 LTO-2 tape drives in a 36 slot library, > and my backups will fit on one tape. > > It turns out that using the Berkeley devices /dev/rmt/0cbn instead of > /dev/rmt/0c

Re: [Bacula-users] Spools less than configured

2005-08-25 Thread Kern Sibbald
Hello, Maybe the SD crashed or something and there is an old spool file that is in your spool directory that should have been deleted. Under 1.37, I have "unified" the naming convention of all Bacula temporary files so that it will be easy to know which ones are used for what (the use is alway

RE: [Bacula-users] Problems restoring large(?) files

2005-08-25 Thread Tom Boyda
Kern, Thank you for a very nice program. I am using MySQL 4.0.14 with 2 LTO-2 tape drives in a 36 slot library, and my backups will fit on one tape. It turns out that using the Berkeley devices /dev/rmt/0cbn instead of /dev/rmt/0cn was the magic to get the restores to work correctly. I verified

RE: [Bacula-users] Problems restoring large(?) files

2005-08-25 Thread Tom Boyda
Arno, Thank you for the pointer. I ran the btape test under 1.36.3 and the tape drives passed. After what you said I re-ran the btape test again with 1.37.30 btape and I saw a problem with btape reporting "Got EOF..." error. I then made the correction changed the devices from /dev/rmt/[0-1]cn to /

[Bacula-users] Spools less than configured

2005-08-25 Thread Kristian Ejvind
Hi. In my small home network I use bacula on a Solaris 9 box to back up three computers. Bacula spools data to local disk in 2 GB chunks before writing to tape, and it has been humming along nicely for a year or so. Suddenly, a couple of weeks ago, it started to spool less than configured, only

Re: [Bacula-users] Pools & Storage location

2005-08-25 Thread Matthias Kurz
On Wed, Aug 24, 2005, Daniel Holtkamp wrote: > Hi ! > > Trying to understand pools & volumes > > Setup: > Let`s say i only have a Default-Pool defined. Two Clients and two > seperate jobs. Also two (File-)Storage locations. Each client backups to > a seperate storage location BUT have the defa

Re: [Bacula-users] Scratch pool

2005-08-25 Thread Ludovic Strappazon
Kern Sibbald a écrit : >On Thursday 25 August 2005 10:54, Ludovic Strappazon wrote: > > >>Kern Sibbald a écrit : >> >> >>>On Thursday 25 August 2005 10:24, Ludovic Strappazon wrote: >>> >>> Kern Sibbald a écrit : >On Thursday 25 August 2005 03:40, Craig Holyoa

Re: [Bacula-users] generic question about jobs

2005-08-25 Thread Timo Eissler
Phil Stracchino schrieb: Timo Eissler wrote: Hello, we have 68 jobs, with 34 clients. In other Backup programs i used before i switched to bacula i had 2 jobs with these 34 clients. Now every client must have it´s own job. I don´t want to read 68 short emails every day. I think it is bette