Thanks a bundle, Troy, you definitely gave me plenty to start with.
> I suspect the list guru's probably will want more info as this output
> doesn't give any real indication of where the problem might lie.
I suspect you're right.
> For starters, I'd provide the output from a completed full job.
Hi there,
>
> Let me know if you need more information.
>
I suspect the list guru's probably will want more info as this output
doesn't give any real indication of where the problem might lie.
For starters, I'd provide the output from a completed full job.
The output you provided is for an in
Howdy, all. I've noticed that my backups are running ridiculously
slow and after watching the lists it seems that the solution was to
update to 2.2.x, as there is much improved database insertion in the
current release. After doing the update on both my client and
director, I don't see any notabl
Manuel Ostendorf wrote:
> Hi Bruno,
>
> I tried with nmap. Right, bacula-fd is not there, that means is closed.
> I have been tried with "iptables -A INPUT -j ACCEPT -p tcp -dport:9102",
> but it is not working. Is that wrong?
>
its just not all you need
you have to set rules for incoming and ou
This is quite old, but I found the solution to my problem. I¹m posting here
for archival purposes in case someone else runs into the same problem.
The solution was to put the autochanger name as the device in the Storage
section of the director¹s configuration. I had the actual drive name listed
a
Felix Schwarz wrote:
> No Fedora 5:
> I did not build RPMs for Fedora 5 because the Fedora Project eol'd this
> version
> of Fedora at the end of June [1]. If you are still using Fedora 5 (or even
> older
> versions) IMHO you should switch either to new versions of Fedora or use
> CentOS
> i
Hello,
20.09.2007 15:14,, Mateus Interciso wrote::
> Hello, I've just started using Bacula, and I have to say that I've found
> it to be great, I just have to get the hand of it :D
>
> But anyway, here is my question, I have this on the bacula-dir.conf (for
> 3 different servers to backup):
>
Hi,
as you might have noticed, I published RPMs for Bacula 2.2.4 on Fedora {6,7}
and
CentOS {4,5} on i386 and x86_64.
Attention: Do not use the RPMs packages if you installed Bacula from the
official Fedora repositories or Fedora EPEL! You will need to uninstall these
RPMs before installing t
Hi,
I have seen what is wrong and i will fix it.
Thanks
On Thursday 20 September 2007 00:11:00 Arno Lehmann wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Short summary for forwarding to the -devel list:
> Bacula 2.2.4
> DIR crashes on certain commands. This might be a command parser issue,
> I think.
>
> Arno
>
> 20.09.2007
Hi Bruno,
I tried with nmap. Right, bacula-fd is not there, that means is closed. I
have been tried with "iptables -A INPUT -j ACCEPT -p tcp -dport:9102", but
it is not working. Is that wrong?
Manuel
On 9/20/07, Bruno Friedmann <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Hi Manuel
>
> simply try (if you have
Hello, I've just started using Bacula, and I have to say that I've found
it to be great, I just have to get the hand of it :D
But anyway, here is my question, I have this on the bacula-dir.conf (for
3 different servers to backup):
#Behemot pool
Pool {
Name = BehemotPool
Pool Type = Backup
Hi Manuel
simply try (if you have ) the nmap command
nmap -v "ip or name of bacula-fd's machine" this should show you at least the
bacula-fd daemon listen port open
if not working : aka no ping you could use -P0 flag.
and if no result are shown, this would indicate that some firewall rules block
Hello,
I want to backup the datas from the remote machine. The bacula is on lokal
machine fine, but the bacula server tried to connect bacula-fd on remote
machine and the connection is failed.
error message:
20-Sep 13:39 HomeLinux-dir: -Console-.2007-09-20_13.35.38 Fatal error:
bsock.c:129 Unabl
Kris Monstad wrote:
> Updating the OS isn't an option currently. Is there no other way of
> getting this data off the tape? Does it absolutely have to be bscanned
> back into the catalog to be restored?
No, you don't have to recreate the catalogue. You can just use bls and
bextract.
-
Francisco Rodrigo Cortinas Maseda wrote:
> Hello,
>
> i have a quite simple question: when i type the "list jobs" command on
> the console, i get this:
>
>
> *list jobs
> +---+---+-+--+---+--+---+---+
> | JobId | Nam
James Harper wrote:
>> Apologies, the OS is Debian GNU/Linux 3.1 - not Ubuntu
>>
>>
>
> I think you're out of luck for 3.1...
>
> Under Debian, you would need to install bacula-sd-xxx where xxx is the
> database backend. Because bscan can interact with the catalogue, you
> have to install the
Hello,
i have a quite simple question: when i type the "list jobs" command on
the console, i get this:
*list jobs
+---+---+-+--+---+--
+---+---+
| JobId | Name | StartTime | Type | Level |
JobF
Martin Simmons wrote:
>> On Wed, 19 Sep 2007 18:58:13 +0200, Marc Cousin said:
>> On Wednesday 19 September 2007 16:59:10 Martin Simmons wrote:
On Wed, 19 Sep 2007 11:54:37 +0200, Cousin Marc said:
I think the problem is linked to the fact dbcheck works more or less row
by ro
Hi,
20.09.2007 09:37,, Ivan Adzhubey wrote::
> Hi Arno,
>
> On Thursday 20 September 2007 03:11:45 am Arno Lehmann wrote:
>> Hi,
>>
>> 20.09.2007 08:42,, Ivan Adzhubey wrote::
>>> Hi,
>>>
>>> Actually, my question is how does Bacula work with Rerun Failed Levels
>>> option disabled? I have it ena
Hi Arno,
On Thursday 20 September 2007 03:11:45 am Arno Lehmann wrote:
> Hi,
>
> 20.09.2007 08:42,, Ivan Adzhubey wrote::
> > Hi,
> >
> > Actually, my question is how does Bacula work with Rerun Failed Levels
> > option disabled? I have it enabled for all jobs and never tried running
> > backups w
Hi,
20.09.2007 08:42,, Ivan Adzhubey wrote::
> Hi,
>
> Actually, my question is how does Bacula work with Rerun Failed Levels option
> disabled? I have it enabled for all jobs and never tried running backups
> without this setting so I have no experience. When enabled, if previous
> higher lev
Hi,
Actually, my question is how does Bacula work with Rerun Failed Levels option
disabled? I have it enabled for all jobs and never tried running backups
without this setting so I have no experience. When enabled, if previous
higher level backup is not found in the catalog then current Increme
Hi,
20.09.2007 08:18,, James Harper wrote::
> If I understand the manual correctly, the moment Bacula hits the
> 'Maximum Volume Bytes' it will stop using that volume (the manual says
> "This value is checked and the Used status set while the job is writing
> to the particular volume.")
>
> What
23 matches
Mail list logo
