Re: [Bacula-users] Windows XP networking dies

2008-12-05 Thread Jason Dixon
On Mon, Dec 01, 2008 at 03:10:36PM -0500, Jason Dixon wrote: > On Mon, Nov 24, 2008 at 01:21:00PM -0500, Josh Fisher wrote: > > > > Jason Dixon wrote: > >> On Mon, Nov 24, 2008 at 12:50:15PM -0500, Josh Fisher wrote: > >> > >>> Jason Dixon wrote: > >>> > We have three XP SP2 workstatio

Re: [Bacula-users] Solaris "Packet size too big" failures

2008-12-05 Thread Jason Dixon
On Wed, Dec 03, 2008 at 02:06:31PM -0500, Jason Dixon wrote: > On Wed, Dec 03, 2008 at 07:02:16PM +, Allan Black wrote: > > Jason Dixon wrote: > >> Wouldn't it fail consistently in that case? It hasn't failed the last > >> two nights. > > > > Good :-) Has it started working since you changed f

Re: [Bacula-users] Bacula FD client compatibility

2008-12-05 Thread Jari Fredriksson
> Hello there, > > I was trying to find file daemon compatibility chart with > director/storage and so far did not find anything useful. > There are some small backups which are set up for quite a > while, there is quite an old version of bacula in use > (1.38). Can I try to mix up older director

Re: [Bacula-users] dbcheck prompts "print them?" ... -- alternative theory

2008-12-05 Thread Tilman Schmidt
/me wrote: > dbcheck again, set "modify database" and "verbose" both to "on", > and then selected test 11 "Eliminate orphaned FileSet records", > which declared: > > Found 2 orphaned FileSet records > Print them? (yes/no): > > When I answered "yes", it went on to tell me: > > Deleting 2 orphaned

Re: [Bacula-users] Speed and integration issues

2008-12-05 Thread Bob Hetzel
> Date: Fri, 5 Dec 2008 04:45:56 -0500 > From: David Lee Lambert <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > I'm trying to use Bacula to do daily backups of data stored in iSCSI LUNs on > a > NetApp filer, using NetApp snapshots to ensure consistency. The hosts to be > backed up have dual Gigabit Ethernet connec

Re: [Bacula-users] Speed and integration issues

2008-12-05 Thread Alex Chekholko
On Fri, 5 Dec 2008 04:45:56 -0500 David Lee Lambert <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > I'm trying to use Bacula to do daily backups of data stored in iSCSI LUNs on > a > NetApp filer, using NetApp snapshots to ensure consistency. The hosts to be > backed up have dual Gigabit Ethernet connections to

Re: [Bacula-users] Why are my jobs upgraded to Full backup?

2008-12-05 Thread Jari Fredriksson
> I'm troubleshooting my backup strategy again. > > > One change I made yesterday: I excluded two additional > directories in the Fileset for all my Linux clients, and > then restarted bacula-dir. I can't see how that would > make bacula think that a full backup is needed, though. > Bacula swit

Re: [Bacula-users] Why are my jobs upgraded to Full backup?

2008-12-05 Thread Ulrich Leodolter
On Fri, 2008-12-05 at 02:53 -0800, Kevin Keane wrote: > I'm troubleshooting my backup strategy again. > > For some reason, today all my jobs ran a full backup instead of the > scheduled incremental. The messages say "Backup Level: Full (upgraded > from Incremental)". In this particular example b

Re: [Bacula-users] Why are my jobs upgraded to Full backup?

2008-12-05 Thread Andrea Conti
> One change I made yesterday: I excluded two additional directories in > the Fileset for all my Linux clients, and then restarted bacula-dir. I > can't see how that would make bacula think that a full backup is needed, > though. What you're seeing is the correct behavior with the default setti

[Bacula-users] dbcheck prompts "print them?" but means "delete them?"

2008-12-05 Thread Tilman Schmidt
I am running the Bacula 2.2.8 director on Linux with a MySQL database. A regular dbcheck had reported orphaned FileSet records, so I ran dbcheck again, set "modify database" and "verbose" both to "on", and then selected test 11 "Eliminate orphaned FileSet records", which declared: Found 2 orphaned

[Bacula-users] pool/tape problems

2008-12-05 Thread Michael Galloway
good day all, looks like my bacula repeated this issue for me. i needed a tape for the catalog backup which goes into the default pool, i did not like any of the volumes in the default pool and pulled in four empty tapes from the scratch pool, and did not find any of them acceptable. media list

Re: [Bacula-users] Why are my jobs upgraded to Full backup?

2008-12-05 Thread Ralf Gross
Kevin Keane schrieb: > I'm troubleshooting my backup strategy again. > > For some reason, today all my jobs ran a full backup instead of the > scheduled incremental. The messages say "Backup Level: Full (upgraded > from Incremental)". In this particular example below, the most recent > full bac

[Bacula-users] Why are my jobs upgraded to Full backup?

2008-12-05 Thread Kevin Keane
I'm troubleshooting my backup strategy again. For some reason, today all my jobs ran a full backup instead of the scheduled incremental. The messages say "Backup Level: Full (upgraded from Incremental)". In this particular example below, the most recent full backup happened on 11/30, with a few

Re: [Bacula-users] Multiple pools and volume names

2008-12-05 Thread Kevin Keane
Arno Lehmann wrote: > Hi, > > 04.12.2008 19:41, Steve Thompson wrote: > >> Bacula 2.4.2. >> >> I have just added a second pool to an all-disk configuration and have a >> question concerning automatic volume numbering. The relevant details are: >> >> Pool { >> Name = Foo_Pool >> Storag

[Bacula-users] Speed and integration issues

2008-12-05 Thread David Lee Lambert
I'm trying to use Bacula to do daily backups of data stored in iSCSI LUNs on a NetApp filer, using NetApp snapshots to ensure consistency. The hosts to be backed up have dual Gigabit Ethernet connections to the NetApp. The backup host consists of: - a desktop-class (32-bit, 2.4GHz) machine w

Re: [Bacula-users] Mount issue

2008-12-05 Thread Arno Lehmann
Hi, 05.12.2008 09:49, Massimo Schenone wrote: > On Thu, 2008-12-04 at 22:16 +0100, Arno Lehmann wrote: >> Hi, >> >> 04.12.2008 12:28, Massimo Schenone wrote: >>> Hm >>> I have released the drive, done an inventory with "update slots scan" >>> and restarted the backup, then mounted the tape by

Re: [Bacula-users] Fatal error: File daemon at "192.168.0.13:9102"rejected Hello command

2008-12-05 Thread Arno Lehmann
Hi, 05.12.2008 08:26, Stefan Eriksson wrote: > Hi does anyone have any news on this? If not, If a developer could contact > me, I'm willing to lend out a test environment to get this possible bug > fixed, getting full support for win2008 would be great, same with virtual > environments (vmware in

Re: [Bacula-users] Mount issue

2008-12-05 Thread Massimo Schenone
On Thu, 2008-12-04 at 22:16 +0100, Arno Lehmann wrote: > Hi, > > 04.12.2008 12:28, Massimo Schenone wrote: > > Hm > > I have released the drive, done an inventory with "update slots scan" > > and restarted the backup, then mounted the tape by hand.. now test > > backup is running... > > Good