Re: [Bacula-users] Debian Packages: Bacula Beta 2.5.42-b2

2009-03-23 Thread Thomas Mueller
Hi Chris > Would you also for Ubuntu? :) > Chris Cameron here they are: README: - use at your own risk - openssl is enabled - no qt/wx gui's included - maybe one has to apply the DB upgrade himself: the sql-file is found here /usr/share/dbconfig-common/data/bacula-director-mysql/upgrade/ mysql

Re: [Bacula-users] How to unmount filesystem

2009-03-23 Thread K. Lelong
Ralf Brinkmann schreef: > K. Lelong schrieb: > > > Something similar happens when I run a job for the disk : the > unmounted disk is mounted, but afterwards I need to manually unmount it > (umount ...) to eject the disk. > > What am I missing ? > > with your last backup job include e.g. the f

Re: [Bacula-users] May I backup Mysql databases and tables in Bacula?

2009-03-23 Thread Tilman Schmidt
openbsd shen schrieb: > I want backup my Mysql databases and tables, may I do it in Bacula? There's a recipe for this on the Wiki: http://wiki.bacula.org/doku.php?id=application_specific_backups:mysql Basically, what you do is dump your databases to files and then back those up with Bacula. HTH

Re: [Bacula-users] limit client console messages

2009-03-23 Thread Foo
On Thu, 19 Mar 2009 11:41:01 +0100, Ulrich Leodolter wrote: > How can i limit console messages to specific client? > > If i call bconsole on clientxyz i'd like to see > only messages related to clientxyz-fd Don't think there is a bconsole command for this, but you could do something like thi

Re: [Bacula-users] DBcheck speed

2009-03-23 Thread Tilman Schmidt
Andreas Schuldei schrieb: > On Mon, Mar 16, 2009 at 5:47 PM, Kevin Keane wrote: >> I don't know enough about the internals of bacula, but my gut feeling is >> that there is some kind of database corruption. You may want to run dbcheck. > > Now i am running dbcheck for ~18h. is there a way to pull

[Bacula-users] Debian Lenny Bacula screw up.

2009-03-23 Thread terryc
I have just "upgraded"(?) my bacula server to debian version lenny and there appears to be a major screwup in their package for this version. First part was it objected to "AcceptAnyVolume=Yes in each pool directive. Second is I can no longer modify a requested job to place its out put in a sel

[Bacula-users] Migration with Autochanger - From Tape to Tape

2009-03-23 Thread Borja Tatay Fandos
Hi there I want to migrate some Jobs from tape to tape, in the same Storage, so I can clean the old tapes and keep the works I'm interested in. But I've found "23-mar 13:23 bacula-dir JobId 2067: Fatal error: Job canceled. Attempt to read and write same device." Is there any way I can go through,

Re: [Bacula-users] Debian Lenny Bacula screw up.

2009-03-23 Thread John Drescher
> I have just "upgraded"(?) my bacula server to debian version lenny and > there appears to be a major screwup in their package for this version. > > First part was it objected to "AcceptAnyVolume=Yes in each pool directive. > I believe that directive went away years ago because the default is to a

[Bacula-users] Purged, recycled and could not connect to client

2009-03-23 Thread Personal Técnico
Hi, I'm getting a big problem (for me...) during a client backup. Problem is detailed here: Bacula detects pararemeters pool and decide to purge and prune volume After purge and prune, it tries to start backup, but client is not available, so backup fails Backup is not done, but volume

Re: [Bacula-users] Purged, recycled and could not connect to client

2009-03-23 Thread Brian McDonald
On Monday 23 March 2009 8:54:39 am Personal Técnico wrote: > Hi, > [snip] > How can I configure bacula for avoiding a previous purging, prunning and recycling pool if client is not accessible? Set up a run before job that tries to contact the client. Have it abort the job if the client is

Re: [Bacula-users] Debian Packages: Bacula Beta 2.5.42-b2

2009-03-23 Thread Chris Cameron
I added deb http://chaschperli.ch/debian intrepid-bacula/ deb-src http://chaschperli.ch/debian intrepid-bacula/ to my /etc/apt/sources.list and get the following warning: W: GPG error: http://chaschperli.ch intrepid-bacula/ Release: The following signatures couldn't be verified because the publi

[Bacula-users] Bat help files

2009-03-23 Thread Kern Sibbald
Hello, It appears that the bat help files are not getting properly installed -- at least in version 2.5 (I never really thought about it in 2.4.x). Can anyone tell me what is the default location that applications such as Bacula are supposed to install their help files? Regards, Kern --

Re: [Bacula-users] Debian Packages: Bacula Beta 2.5.42-b2

2009-03-23 Thread Thomas Mueller
On Mon, 23 Mar 2009 09:47:34 -0500, Chris Cameron wrote: > I added > > deb http://chaschperli.ch/debian intrepid-bacula/ deb-src > http://chaschperli.ch/debian intrepid-bacula/ > > to my /etc/apt/sources.list and get the following warning: > > W: GPG error: http://chaschperli.ch intrepid-bacula

Re: [Bacula-users] [Bacula-devel] Bat help files

2009-03-23 Thread Marc Schiffbauer
I think I misunderstood you sorry. I read "bacula help files" not bat help files ;) It seems like bat only looks for an index.html in the current working directory which is not good ;) I would say /usr/share/doc/bat/ -Marc * Kern Sibbald schrieb am 23.03.09 um 16:42 Uhr: > Hello, > > It appe

[Bacula-users] XP backups stopping after 3.459 G

2009-03-23 Thread Stephen Dale
Good morning, I'm running bacula 2.2.8 on a PPC Ubuntu Hardy Heron box, backing up a Windows XP Pro box running the 2.4.4 client, backing up to files on the bacula director host. Whenever I kick off a backup, they start, and data is backed up, but every time at 3.459G of data (of the 47G total) t

Re: [Bacula-users] [Bacula-devel] Bat help files

2009-03-23 Thread Marc Schiffbauer
* Kern Sibbald schrieb am 23.03.09 um 16:42 Uhr: > Hello, > > It appears that the bat help files are not getting properly installed -- at > least in version 2.5 (I never really thought about it in 2.4.x). Can anyone > tell me what is the default location that applications such as Bacula are >

Re: [Bacula-users] [Bacula-devel] Bat help files

2009-03-23 Thread John Drescher
On Mon, Mar 23, 2009 at 12:54 PM, Marc Schiffbauer wrote: > > I think I misunderstood you sorry. I read "bacula help files" not > bat help files ;) > > It seems like bat only looks for an index.html in the current > working directory which is not good ;) > > I would say /usr/share/doc/bat/ > In

Re: [Bacula-users] [Bacula-devel] Bat help files

2009-03-23 Thread Kern Sibbald
On Monday 23 March 2009 17:54:21 Marc Schiffbauer wrote: > I think I misunderstood you sorry. I read "bacula help files" not > bat help files ;) > > It seems like bat only looks for an index.html in the current > working directory which is not good ;) Yes, exactly. I didn't go into all the detail

Re: [Bacula-users] Debian Packages: Bacula Beta 2.5.42-b2

2009-03-23 Thread Chris Cameron
Now I get W: Conflicting distribution: http://chaschperli.ch intrepid-bacula/ Release (expected intrepid-bacula but got intrepid-pacemaker) W: You may want to run apt-get update to correct these problems ~Chris Cameron Sent from: Houston TX United States. On Mon, Mar 23, 2009 at 11:08 AM, Thoma

Re: [Bacula-users] [Bacula-devel] Bat help files

2009-03-23 Thread Kevin Keane
John Drescher wrote: > On Mon, Mar 23, 2009 at 12:54 PM, Marc Schiffbauer > wrote: > >> I think I misunderstood you sorry. I read "bacula help files" not >> bat help files ;) >> >> It seems like bat only looks for an index.html in the current >> working directory which is not good ;) >> >> I w

Re: [Bacula-users] Question about Priorities and Maximum Concurrent Jobs

2009-03-23 Thread John Lockard
On Sat, Mar 21, 2009 at 05:10:09AM -0700, Kevin Keane wrote: > John Lockard wrote: > > The minimum setting I have on Max Concurrent Jobs is on the > > Tape Library and that's set to 3. It appears that priority > > trumps all, unless the priority is the same or better. > > > > So, if I have one job

Re: [Bacula-users] Debian Packages: Bacula Beta 2.5.42-b2

2009-03-23 Thread Thomas Mueller
On Mon, 23 Mar 2009 14:21:32 -0500, Chris Cameron wrote: > Now I get > > W: Conflicting distribution: http://chaschperli.ch intrepid-bacula/ > Release (expected intrepid-bacula but got intrepid-pacemaker) W: You may > want to run apt-get update to correct these problems sorry, copy&paste error.

Re: [Bacula-users] Debian Packages: Bacula Beta 2.5.42-b2

2009-03-23 Thread Chris Cameron
The error is now gone, but it still doesn't want to upgrade r...@daffy:/var/www# aptitude update Hit http://chaschperli.ch intrepid-bacula/ Release.gpg Ign http://chaschperli.ch intrepid-bacula/ Translation-en_US Hit http://chaschperli.ch intrepid-bacula/ Release Hit http://chaschperli.ch intrep

Re: [Bacula-users] Debian Lenny Bacula screw up.

2009-03-23 Thread terryc
John Drescher wrote: >> I have just "upgraded"(?) my bacula server to debian version lenny and >> there appears to be a major screwup in their package for this version. >> >> First part was it objected to "AcceptAnyVolume=Yes in each pool directive. >> > I believe that directive went away years ago

Re: [Bacula-users] [Bacula-devel] Bat help files

2009-03-23 Thread Marc Schiffbauer
* Kevin Keane schrieb am 23.03.09 um 20:36 Uhr: > > > >> I think I misunderstood you sorry. I read "bacula help files" not > >> bat help files ;) > >> > >> It seems like bat only looks for an index.html in the current > >> working directory which is not good ;) > >> > >> I would say /usr/share/d

Re: [Bacula-users] Accurate restoration of renamed/deleted file

2009-03-23 Thread Craig Ringer
Frank Sweetser wrote: > [deleted file tracking] has been implemented in the current development code > base. Oh, I also meant to ask: Does deleted file tracking require the cooperation of the fd? Or will I be able to keep on using 2.4 fds on my clients? It'd be helpful not to have to run 2.4

Re: [Bacula-users] Accurate restoration of renamed/deleted file

2009-03-23 Thread Craig Ringer
Frank Sweetser wrote: > Craig Ringer wrote: >> I note that deleted/renamed file tracking is no longer shown on the >> sf.net bacula projects document: >> >> http://bacula.svn.sourceforge.net/viewvc/bacula/trunk/bacula/projects?view=markup >> >> >> >> Is it complete? I haven't seen anything about

Re: [Bacula-users] Accurate restoration of renamed/deleted file

2009-03-23 Thread Frank Sweetser
Craig Ringer wrote: > Frank Sweetser wrote: >> Craig Ringer wrote: >>> I note that deleted/renamed file tracking is no longer shown on the >>> sf.net bacula projects document: >>> >>> http://bacula.svn.sourceforge.net/viewvc/bacula/trunk/bacula/projects?view=markup >>> >>> >>> >>> Is it complete

Re: [Bacula-users] Accurate restoration of renamed/deleted file

2009-03-23 Thread Frank Sweetser
Craig Ringer wrote: > Frank Sweetser wrote: > >> [deleted file tracking] has been implemented in the current >> development code base. > > Oh, I also meant to ask: > > Does deleted file tracking require the cooperation of the fd? Or will I > be able to keep on using 2.4 fds on my clients? It'd

Re: [Bacula-users] Debian Packages: Bacula Beta 2.5.42-b2

2009-03-23 Thread Craig Ringer
Chris Cameron wrote: > The error is now gone, but it still doesn't want to upgrade > > > r...@daffy:/var/www# aptitude update The repository at: http://chaschperli.ch/debian/intrepid-bacula is empty, which is why it's not doing anything. It looks like the package files didn't make it into the

Re: [Bacula-users] Accurate restoration of renamed/deleted file

2009-03-23 Thread Craig Ringer
Frank Sweetser wrote: > Craig Ringer wrote: >> Frank Sweetser wrote: >> >>> [deleted file tracking] has been implemented in the current >>> development code base. >> >> Oh, I also meant to ask: >> >> Does deleted file tracking require the cooperation of the fd? Or will >> I be able to keep on usi

Re: [Bacula-users] Accurate restoration of renamed/deleted file

2009-03-23 Thread Craig Ringer
Craig Ringer wrote: > Frank Sweetser wrote: >> Craig Ringer wrote: >>> Frank Sweetser wrote: >>> [deleted file tracking] has been implemented in the current development code base. >>> Oh, I also meant to ask: >>> >>> Does deleted file tracking require the cooperation of the fd? Or will

Re: [Bacula-users] Debian Packages: Bacula Beta 2.5.42-b2

2009-03-23 Thread Thomas Mueller
On Tue, 24 Mar 2009 12:51:08 +0900, Craig Ringer wrote: > Chris Cameron wrote: >> The error is now gone, but it still doesn't want to upgrade >> >> >> r...@daffy:/var/www# aptitude update > > The repository at: > > http://chaschperli.ch/debian/intrepid-bacula > > is empty, which is why it's n