> I have 4 pools total, two pools defined by me: Offsite and Onsite and two
> that I believe are default to Bacula: Catalog and Scratch.
>
> Offsite retention period is 6 months, Onsite is 3 months. Once a volume is
> marked full from Onsite the volume goes on the shelf to the back of the
> stac
Daniel Bareiro wrote:
> Hi all!
>
Hi there Daniel!
> But when trying to run the startup script, I get the following errors:
>
> [r...@localhost scripts]# /etc/init.d/bacula start
> Starting the Bacula Storage daemon /usr/sbin/bacula-sd: error while loading
shared libraries:
> libbacpy-5.0.1.so
The point I was making with my original post was that the file restore of the
6.2TB of data is taking many times longer than it did to back it up. For
instance, I started the backup last Friday 7/22 and it still isn't finished
today, only about half-finished. If the original backup time was 37
> On Thu, 22 Jul 2010 08:51:58 -0600, May, John said:
>
> Bacula says the durantion for the job was 36:49:03 to backup 6.2TB.
>
> So, the time it takes to backup the job affects the time it takes to restore?
No, but both times are affected by the size of the job. But isn't that
obvious? Ma
On 07/22/10 06:42, Mister IT Guru wrote:
> At this point, I assume that all my good jobs will now be on my new
> storage daemon.
Sounds that way.
> I'd like to recover all the disk space being used by my
> current pools, (I'm not sure how to do that at this point, tips are
> appreciated! I was
Hi all!
I'm installing Bacula 5.0.2 on RHEL 5.5 using the following procedure
after having downloaded the bacula-5.0.2.tar.gz tarball:
# ./configure \
--prefix=/usr \
--sbindir=/usr/sbin \
--sysconfdir=/etc/bacula \
--with-scriptdir=/etc/bacula/scripts \
--enable-smartalloc \
--with-openssl
Bacula says the durantion for the job was 36:49:03 to backup 6.2TB.
So, the time it takes to backup the job affects the time it takes to restore?
-John
-Original Message-
From: Martin Simmons [mailto:mar...@lispworks.com]
Sent: Thursday, July 22, 2010 5:50 AM
To: bacula-users@lists.sour
> On Thu, 22 Jul 2010 14:43:53 +0100, Rory Campbell-Lange said:
>
> On 22/07/10, John Drescher (dresche...@gmail.com) wrote:
> > On Thu, Jul 22, 2010 at 7:07 AM, Rory Campbell-Lange
> > > I am now using a spool to see what is happening for the locally attached
> > > Coraid storage. The locally
I'm not sure how mySQL got installed
I think it got pulled in when I used
Synaptic to install the bacula meta-package. I had previously installed the
tools. mySQL server is running after normal boot (every time)
as are
bacula-sd and bacula-fd. Both root and bacula users can access mySQL via
On 22/07/10, John Drescher (dresche...@gmail.com) wrote:
> On Thu, Jul 22, 2010 at 7:07 AM, Rory Campbell-Lange
> > I am now using a spool to see what is happening for the locally attached
> > Coraid storage. The locally attached storage runs at a (contended) write
> > of 77MB/s and read of over 10
2010/7/22 Stan :
> Trying to start bacula-dir:
>
> ==
>
> backupServer:/# bacula-dir -d 100 -c /etc/bacula/bacula-dir.conf
>
> bacula-dir: dird.c:157-0 Debug level = 100
>
> bacula-dir: jcr.c:135-0 read_last_jobs seek t
On Thu, Jul 22, 2010 at 7:07 AM, Rory Campbell-Lange
wrote:
> On 21/07/10, Rory Campbell-Lange (r...@campbell-lange.net) wrote:
>> On 21/07/10, Craig Miskell (craig.misk...@opus.co.nz) wrote:
>> > Rory Campbell-Lange wrote:
>> > >On 19/07/10, Rory Campbell-Lange (r...@campbell-lange.net) wrote:
>>
> On Wed, 21 Jul 2010 13:59:34 -0600, May, John said:
>
> As far as I know it was running at about 70MB/s. It could have been
> shoe-shining a bit though, not really sure.
600GB at 70MB/s would only take 2.5 hours so it can't have been getting that
at a sustained rate. Shoe-shining sounds l
> On Wed, 21 Jul 2010 17:18:06 -0500, Steve Costaras said:
>
> I am looking at doing base jobs to help avoid tying up systems for too
> long though until multi-threading for the FD arrives it's kind of moot
> as it takes the same amount of time with large file sets.I use the
> MD5 check
On Thursday 22 July 2010 14:14:11 Dan Langille wrote:
> On 7/22/2010 6:08 AM, Silver Salonen wrote:
> > On Thursday 22 July 2010 11:52:31 Silver Salonen wrote:
> >> On Thursday 22 July 2010 10:45:33 Dan Langille wrote:
> >>> A side note, for future reference: It is best to create a new email
> >>>
On 7/22/2010 6:08 AM, Silver Salonen wrote:
> On Thursday 22 July 2010 11:52:31 Silver Salonen wrote:
>> On Thursday 22 July 2010 10:45:33 Dan Langille wrote:
>>> A side note, for future reference: It is best to create a new email
>>> instead of replying to an existing thread. Your issue is slight
On 21/07/10, Rory Campbell-Lange (r...@campbell-lange.net) wrote:
> On 21/07/10, Craig Miskell (craig.misk...@opus.co.nz) wrote:
> > Rory Campbell-Lange wrote:
> > >On 19/07/10, Rory Campbell-Lange (r...@campbell-lange.net) wrote:
> > > > I ran a full backup of a volume last week on Bacula v2.4.4 a
My understanding and usage of Bacula has been somewhat distorted,
and I can assume that I didn't pick it up properly. As time has passed,
I've figured some new ways of doing things, and I've decided to have a
crack at cleaning up my storage daemon. This is not something that I've
attempted
I don't see anything wront with it. Can you post
/etc/bacula/INCLUDES/schedules.conf ?
>Hi,
>
>2010/7/21 :
>> Can you post your configuration for the Jobs and Pools? That thing with the
>> incremental jobs shouldn't happen.
>
>Sure, I've anonymized the relevant config files (hopefully all that
On Thursday 22 July 2010 11:52:31 Silver Salonen wrote:
> On Thursday 22 July 2010 10:45:33 Dan Langille wrote:
> > A side note, for future reference: It is best to create a new email
> > instead of replying to an existing thread. Your issue is slightly
> > related only in that it's FreeBSD. Se
On Thursday 22 July 2010 10:45:33 Dan Langille wrote:
> A side note, for future reference: It is best to create a new email
> instead of replying to an existing thread. Your issue is slightly
> related only in that it's FreeBSD. See below.
OK, I just thought it's a very similar problem with li
Phil,
On Wed, 2010-07-21 at 12:05 -0400, Phil Stracchino wrote:
> On 07/21/10 09:26, Enrico van Goor wrote:
> > Hi all,
> >
> > We make backups of about 200 server at the moment, to disk. Twice a week
> > a Full backup and 5 times a week an incremental. Every day is a
> > different pool, so the
On 7/22/2010 2:11 AM, Silver Salonen wrote:
> On Tuesday 20 July 2010 22:10:45 Dan Langille wrote:
>> On 7/20/2010 12:20 PM, Paul Mather wrote:
>>> I'm running FreeBSD 8.1-PRERELEASE (RELENG_8). Recently, the
> sysutils/bacula-{client,server} ports were updated to 5.0.2. Unfortunately,
> when upd
23 matches
Mail list logo
