[Bacula-users] vchanger

2013-09-20 Thread Greg Woods
I'm having some trouble getting vchanger to work, partly because the documentation that comes with it seems not to be up to date. For instance, the keywords described in the howto HTML file that comes with the source are invalid keywords. The example config file has the right keywords, but I'm havi

[Bacula-users] upgrading bacula from one server to an entirely different pi

2013-09-20 Thread jaredk51
Thanks for the reply Uwe, when you mention "upgrade bacula tables" scripts, are these scripts that can be found within the compiled bacula software itself? Thanks +-- |This was sent by jkel...@popcap.com via Backup Central. |For

Re: [Bacula-users] USB tape drives?

2013-09-20 Thread Greg Woods
On Tue, 2013-09-17 at 13:13 +0300, Guy wrote: > Yes I do this with vchanger... I've run into a wall trying to get vchanger to compile on Raspbian (a limited version of Debian for the Raspberry Pi). When I run configure, it notes that I do not have libuuid. I believe this is correct; there is a s

[Bacula-users] volume Labeling with Autochanger

2013-09-20 Thread Deepak
Dear Team, While labeling a new volume My system is asking me to enter auto changer drive. See Below command output: *label barcodes slot=1 pool=pool1 Automatically selected Catalog: catalog1 Using Catalog "catalog1" The defined Storage resources are: 1: File 2: Autochanger Select

Re: [Bacula-users] volume Labeling with Autochanger

2013-09-20 Thread Steve Ellis
I'm not an expert, but my guess would be that no, this won't affect which drive will be used for backup--except to the extent that the tape in question is left in that drive until the backup runs--my understanding is that a mounted (& suitable) tape, in whichever drive, is preferred when running a

Re: [Bacula-users] USB tape drives?

2013-09-20 Thread Josh Fisher
On 9/20/2013 2:17 PM, Greg Woods wrote: On Tue, 2013-09-17 at 13:13 +0300, Guy wrote: Yes I do this with vchanger... I've run into a wall trying to get vchanger to compile on Raspbian (a limited version of Debian for the Raspberry Pi). When I run configure, it notes that I do not have libuuid

Re: [Bacula-users] USB tape drives?

2013-09-20 Thread Greg Woods
On Fri, 2013-09-20 at 12:17 -0600, Greg Woods wrote: > On Tue, 2013-09-17 at 13:13 +0300, Guy wrote: > > Yes I do this with vchanger... > > I've run into a wall trying to get vchanger to compile on Raspbian (a > limited version of Debian for the Raspberry Pi). I did solve the compile issue. With

Re: [Bacula-users] Fatal error: Authorization key rejected by Storage daemon.

2013-09-20 Thread Ana Emília M . Arruda
Hi Kevin, Just trying to understand... The error bellow: Restore-public-Disk.2013-09-20_12.43.48_32 is waiting for Client to connect to Storage daemon ... 20-Sep 12:19 public-fd JobId 19084: Fatal error: Authorization key rejected by Storage daemon. Please seehttp://www.bacula.org/rel-manual/faq.

[Bacula-users] Fatal error: Authorization key rejected by Storage daemon.

2013-09-20 Thread Kevin B. Zimmerman
Greetings - I'm running Bacula 5.2.5 on an Ubuntu 12.04.3 server, with about 61TB of disk storage and an attached Dell PVTL2000 tape library. Backups are working great, but restores are presenting a problem. Here's my dilemma: When attempting to restore a file, I get this status for about 10 m

Re: [Bacula-users] Is anyone using >128K blocks with LTO-4 or LTO-5 drives?

2013-09-20 Thread Alan Brown
On 20/09/13 15:03, Andreas Koch wrote: > -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- > Hash: SHA1 > > Hi Alan, > > can you let me know what hardware (SAS Controller) and OS (kernel version) > you use? Everything is FC connected using QLA 2430-series controllers. When linux first connects to the drives it

Re: [Bacula-users] Is anyone using >128K blocks with LTO-4 or LTO-5 drives?

2013-09-20 Thread Brian Debelius
On 09/20/2013 04:21 AM, Thomas wrote: > Hi Andreas, > > we are using also LTO-5 with 2M Blocksize and without any Problems. > > Drives and Kernel are: > > Linux 3.2.0-4-amd64 #1 SMP Debian 3.2.46-1+deb7u1 x86_64 GNU/Linux > Medium ChangerOVERLAND NEO Series > IBM ULTRIUM-TD5 > IBM ULT

Re: [Bacula-users] Is anyone using >128K blocks with LTO-4 or LTO-5 drives?

2013-09-20 Thread Rao, Uthra R. (GSFC-672.0)[ADNET SYSTEMS INC]
I am curious to find out if I change the block size will I be able to go back and restore data from tapes that has the old block size? Thanks, URao -Original Message- From: Alan Brown [mailto:a...@mssl.ucl.ac.uk] Sent: Friday, September 20, 2013 9:44 AM To: Andreas Koch Cc: bacula-users

Re: [Bacula-users] Is anyone using >128K blocks with LTO-4 or LTO-5 drives?

2013-09-20 Thread Thomas
it seems that bacula's limit is "<= 400" from src/stored/block.c : >if (block_len > 400) { > Dmsg3(20, "Dump block %s 0x%x blocksize too big %u\n", msg, b, > block_len); > return; >} another limit i found is this one from the output of "dmesg | grep st" : > [3.6

Re: [Bacula-users] Is anyone using >128K blocks with LTO-4 or LTO-5 drives?

2013-09-20 Thread Alan Brown
On 20/09/13 13:22, Andreas Koch wrote: > > Many thanks for the data point! When we use Bacula (not just btape) with > larger block sizes (512 KB), our backups abort when bacula fails to read the > tape's header block. > Did you attempt to mix blocksizes on the same physical tape? That will not wo

Re: [Bacula-users] Is anyone using >128K blocks with LTO-4 or LTO-5 drives?

2013-09-20 Thread Andreas Koch
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On 09/20/2013 03:43 PM, Alan Brown wrote: > On 20/09/13 13:22, Andreas Koch wrote: >> >> Many thanks for the data point! When we use Bacula (not just btape) >> with larger block sizes (512 KB), our backups abort when bacula fails >> to read the tape's

Re: [Bacula-users] An article about managing disk space

2013-09-20 Thread Jeff MacDonald
On 2013-09-20, at 6:08 AM, Uwe Schuerkamp wrote: > Nice work, thanks for sharing! > > Maybe a word or two on preventing this situation in the first place > might be helpful, like restricting volume sizes & number? > > Also, you could consider documenting deleting a volume from a disk > pool

Re: [Bacula-users] Is anyone using >128K blocks with LTO-4 or LTO-5 drives?

2013-09-20 Thread Alex Crow
Original Message *Subject:* Re: [Bacula-users] Is anyone using >128K blocks with LTO-4 or LTO-5 drives? *Date:* Fri, 20 Sep 2013 14:22:55 +0200 *From:* Andreas Koch *To:* Thomas *CC:* bacula-users@lists.sourceforge.net Many thanks for the data point! When we use Bacula (not just bt

Re: [Bacula-users] Why Marking Volume "XXXXXX" in Error in Catalog.

2013-09-20 Thread Radosław Korzeniewski
Hello, 2013/9/20 > Hi, > > ** ** > > I am using uncompressed backup. > > ** > So, check your backup job logs or show these logs here. and please, do not topposting. best regards -- Radosław Korzeniewski rados...@korzeniewski.net -

Re: [Bacula-users] Why Marking Volume "XXXXXX" in Error in Catalog.

2013-09-20 Thread Radosław Korzeniewski
Hello, 2013/9/20 > Thanks for Reply…!!! > > ** ** > > ** ** > > I come to know that, there was no more space for mysql database. So > Catalog was not able to grow . J > > ** ** > > I am facing one more Issue. > > ** ** > > ** ** > > I have three volumes in my data pool which I have

Re: [Bacula-users] Is anyone using >128K blocks with LTO-4 or LTO-5 drives?

2013-09-20 Thread Andreas Koch
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On 09/20/2013 10:21 AM, Thomas wrote: > Hi Andreas, > > we are using also LTO-5 with 2M Blocksize and without any Problems. > > Drives and Kernel are: > > Linux 3.2.0-4-amd64 #1 SMP Debian 3.2.46-1+deb7u1 x86_64 GNU/Linux Medium > ChangerOVERLAN

Re: [Bacula-users] Why Marking Volume "XXXXXX" in Error in Catalog.

2013-09-20 Thread deepak.pal
Hi, I am using uncompressed backup. From: Radosław Korzeniewski [mailto:rados...@korzeniewski.net] Sent: Friday, September 20, 2013 5:33 PM To: Deepak Pal (WI01 - GIS - RCT); bacula-users Subject: Re: [Bacula-users] Why Marking Volume "XX" in Error in Catalog. Hello, 2013/9/20 mailto:deepak

Re: [Bacula-users] An article about managing disk space

2013-09-20 Thread Uwe Schuerkamp
Nice work, thanks for sharing! Maybe a word or two on preventing this situation in the first place might be helpful, like restricting volume sizes & number? Also, you could consider documenting deleting a volume from a disk pool (update pool from resource and so on) once the reader has cleaned

Re: [Bacula-users] upgrading bacula from one server to an entirely different piece of hardware

2013-09-20 Thread Uwe Schuerkamp
On Thu, Sep 19, 2013 at 04:30:58PM -0700, Jared Kelley wrote: > Bconsole tells me I'm running this version of bacula. > *version > backup1-dir Version: 3.0.1 (30 April 2009) i686-pc-linux-gnu debian 5.0.1 > > I inherited this setup and need to upgrade on a new server because the raid > controller

Re: [Bacula-users] choosing database.

2013-09-20 Thread Uwe Schuerkamp
On Thu, Sep 19, 2013 at 11:07:47AM -0500, Dimitri Maziuk wrote: > > Mysql is known for "features" like inserting 0 in a NOT NULL column > instead of throwing errors, case-sensitive identifiers, and so on and so > forth, with Oracle lawyers looming in the background. I wouldn't pick it > for anythi

Re: [Bacula-users] Is anyone using >128K blocks with LTO-4 or LTO-5 drives?

2013-09-20 Thread Thomas
Hi Andreas, we are using also LTO-5 with 2M Blocksize and without any Problems. Drives and Kernel are: Linux 3.2.0-4-amd64 #1 SMP Debian 3.2.46-1+deb7u1 x86_64 GNU/Linux Medium ChangerOVERLAND NEO Series IBM ULTRIUM-TD5 IBM ULTRIUM-TD5 the btape tests fails like in your example, b

Re: [Bacula-users] Why Marking Volume "XXXXXX" in Error in Catalog.

2013-09-20 Thread Radosław Korzeniewski
Hello, 2013/9/19 > Dear Team, > > ** ** > > While running a Incremental Job on a volume I received below errors. > > ** ** > > 19-Sep 22:06 backup-sd JobId 129: 3305 Autochanger "load slot 5, drive 0", > status is OK. > > 19-Sep 22:06 backup-sd JobId 129: Volume "A00044L4" previousl

Re: [Bacula-users] choosing database.

2013-09-20 Thread lst_hoe02
Zitat von Mauro : > On 19 September 2013 21:53, wrote: > >> >> Zitat von Konstantin Khomoutov : >> >> >> Our biggest single job has about 1TB data with some 3.3 million files. >> This lead to around 1GB spooled attributes which will be absorbed in >> less then 2 minutes. Database is Postgres wit