On 4/08/2015 2:41 PM, More, Ankush wrote:
> Hi Team,
>
> I want to restore backup of one Linux and window client to different Linux
> and Window server for testing.
> Is it possible?
> If yes then what command I should use or need any configuration changes?
> Can I initiate restore from client?
>
Hi Team,
I want to restore backup of one Linux and window client to different Linux and
Window server for testing.
Is it possible?
If yes then what command I should use or need any configuration changes?
Can I initiate restore from client?
Thank you,
Ankush More
This message contains informati
Hello,
It realize later versions of selinux causes problems with restoring from
Bacula, and that there are various methods to get around the problem.
However, I notice there are also stat messages like those shown below:
03-Aug 14:06 JobId 123952: Could not stat
"/var/spool/postfix/public/s
On Sun, Aug 2, 2015 at 5:43 PM, Michael Schwager wrote:
> Starngely, we have another tape that SHOULD be available. Tapes in this
> pool are set to recycle after 90 days, and 90 days ago from today is May
> 4th.
> We have a tape that was last written to on March 28. So why would Bacula
> block
Yes, I think so, for daily full backups.
I have 5 years retentions for my full backups, but they are full monthly
backups. For daily and weekly backups, we use incremental and differential
types.
Regards,
Ana
On Mon, Aug 3, 2015 at 6:19 PM, Dimitri Maziuk
wrote:
> On 08/03/2015 04:07 PM, Ana Em
Thanks. I will look at the max time settings. Regarding setting the enabled
field, I think rather than that, I will use list nextvol, and make sure the
changer is populated with the proper tape. This should keep Bacula
satisfied.
I can even query the database and look for some of the other tapes t
On 08/03/2015 04:07 PM, Ana Emília M. Arruda wrote:
> Hello Robert,
>
> Yes, you should rethink your pool/volume configurations, specially volumes
> and pool sizes regarding the amount of space you have to accommodate them.
> You have a very high retention period.
365 days is high? There are plac
On 08/03/2015 03:35 PM, Michael Schwager wrote:
> In my case, there are Jobs associated with the MediaId in the JobMedia
> database table, but this JobId does not exist in the Job table.
This means there should be a foreign key on jobmedia: jobid references
job (jobid) on delete cascade. Looking
Hello,
Max Wait Time works as expected. I´m affraid 30 seconds is not enough time
to wait for a tape to be mounted if you´re using a tape library. The
default time that bacula waits for a device that is busy (initializing or
something else) is 5 minutes. If you´re working with a tape library I wou
Hello Robert,
Yes, you should rethink your pool/volume configurations, specially volumes
and pool sizes regarding the amount of space you have to accommodate them.
You have a very high retention period. It is importante to assure you will
have enough space for bacula creating new volumes in the po
Hello Michael,
I have been using Bacula tape volumes for 7 years. Since 3.X version up to
now with 7.0.5 version. I had no problem with bacula recycling algorithm.
About your problem, the EPW680L3 volume should be used instead
EPW681L3 volume
if these two volumes had the same settings (volume re
This is very similar to the recent "BLOCKED waiting on ..." thread. Q: I am
thinking of making the Max Volume Bytes and Max Volumes larger to fix this.
Ok? Running Jobs:
Console connected at 03-Aug-15 15:28
Console connected at 03-Aug-15 15:30
JobId Type Level Files Bytes Name Status
==
Well, to answer my own question, here's the algorithm (use The Source,
Luke!):
CLUE1: During the backup, after the previous tape filled, my log file says,
"There are no more Jobs associated with Volume "EPW681L3". Marking it
purged."
That text comes from ua_purge.c, which runs the following SQL c
On 08/03/2015 09:45 AM, Michael Schwager wrote:
> Kern,
> Thanks for the reply from The Man himself :-) .
>
> I ran update slots, and it's true that EPW681L3 is not in the library. But
> that's as I planned it it: Why would it go to EPW681L3 when EPW680L3 is right
> there in the library? It is in
I read in this link http://marc.info/?l=bacula-bugs&m=127548196026667 that The
current definition of MaxWaitTime take the following status in account:
JS_WaitFD
JS_WaitSD
JS_WaitMedia
JS_WaitMount
JS_WaitStoreRes
JS_WaitJobRes
JS_WaitClientRes
JS_WaitMaxJobs
JS
On 2015-08-03 08:45, Michael Schwager wrote:
> Under v. 5.x, I discovered that Bacula's tape usage algorithm went
> something like this: "Use an eligible tape from the library." I
> discovered (I think) that I could use any tape that met Bacula's
> rewritable criteria. Now, I don't know what the a
Kern,
Thanks for the reply from The Man himself :-) .
I ran update slots, and it's true that EPW681L3 is not in the library. But
that's as I planned it it: Why would it go to EPW681L3 when EPW680L3 is
right there in the library? It is in the same pool, it is as full as
EPW681L3 once was, it's olde
> What setting should I use to configure a FileSet for backing up a Windows disk
> with all it's partitions?
Hello Luc. RTNM (Read the Nice Manual =P):
http://www.bacula.org/5.2.x-manuals/en/main/main/Configuring_Director.html#SECTION0014110010
Kudos,
==
What setting should I use to configure a FileSet for backing up a Windows
disk with all it's partitions?
Best regartd,
Luc
--
___
Bacula-users mailing list
Bacula-users@lists.s
Hello,
we use bacula now for about 6 years and it works great. Some 6 month ago we
switched to another Bacula Server. The switch included changing the OS from
Linux to FreeBSD (to get better flexibility with ZFS, etc.).
Since the move we experience some problems. I keep logs for about 3 month
20 matches
Mail list logo
