Re: [Bacula-users] Conflict When Upgrading from Bacula 9.4.4 to 11.0.5

Hi, This is something I’d like to fix since time with bacula rpm packages. You’re right, as of now, you need to uninstall the bacula-client and then install bacula-postgresql rpm package. Best regards Davide On Fri, 5 Nov 2021 at 18:39 Radosław Korzeniewski wrote: > Hello, > > pt., 5 lis 202

[Bacula-users] feedback requested on new backup strategy

I've been using bacula for many years, but as the volume of our data has grown and we've gotten a new tape library, I'm about to implement a new strategy for our backup jobs and I'd like your feedback. Environment:scientific research center Data volume:~400TB Growth

Re: [Bacula-users] Can't Label Tapes

Hello, pt., 5 lis 2021 o 17:52 Jeffrey Di Domenico napisał(a): > Hi, > > I have loaded new tapes with physical labels but Bacula can't label them, > I get the timeout error below but I've had them in the past and Bacula has > still labelled the tapes, I can't see that there is anything wrong wit

Re: [Bacula-users] Conflict When Upgrading from Bacula 9.4.4 to 11.0.5

Hello, pt., 5 lis 2021 o 15:36 J W napisał(a): > >> yum list installed|grep bacula shows no bacula rpms installed. >> >> Below I tried to install using yum. I get a msg. that there is a conflict >> between bacula-postgresql-11.0.5-1.x86_64 and bacula-client. >> >> Any idea how to fix? >> >> Did

[Bacula-users] Can't Label Tapes

Hi, I have loaded new tapes with physical labels but Bacula can't label them, I get the timeout error below but I've had them in the past and Bacula has still labelled the tapes, I can't see that there is anything wrong with the drives and it doesn't seem to be taking that long but it fails e

Re: [Bacula-users] Conflict When Upgrading from Bacula 9.4.4 to 11.0.5

I tried to revert back to 9.4.4 and get the same error. I installed everything but bacula-client and it seems that the client is already installed with bacula-postgresq. I must have known this the first time I installed 9.4.4. I guess the instructions do not say to install the client on the serve

Re: [Bacula-users] Slow transfer rate - MS Win 2019

Just in time: . Rgds. -- MSc Heitor Faria (Miami/USA) CEO Bacula LatAm mobile1: + 1 909 655-8971 mobile2: + 55 61 98268-4220 América Latina [ http://bacula.lat/]

Re: [Bacula-users] Slow transfer rate - MS Win 2019

Hello Andras, I would use an external tool such as diskspd or any other to validate the DFS directory reading speed. E.g. . IMHO Clustered Filesystems will hardly have the same speed of regular ones. Hadoop h

Re: [Bacula-users] Slow transfer rate - MS Win 2019

Unfortunately, I do not see Event 513 in the application log in Event viewer. :( I did an estimate last night to check how much data and files we are about to backup, I was not able to wait for the result. Today morning I checked and this is the result: 2000 OK estimate files=444,041 bytes=271,286,

[Bacula-users] Conflict When Upgrading from Bacula 9.4.4 to 11.0.5

I am trying to upgrade from Bacula 9.4.4 to 11.0.5. My OS is Centos 7. I backed up my Bacula installation and catalog then uninstalled Bacula 9.4.4. yum list installed|grep bacula shows no bacula rpms installed. Below I tried to install using yum. I get a msg. that there is a conflict between b

Re: [Bacula-users] Slow transfer rate - MS Win 2019

On 11/4/21 19:10, Andras Horvai wrote: I think the issue is the number of files/directories on the file server I want to backup. Bacula-fd cannot count them... but bacula-fd.exe daemon does not use/does not want to use more resources on the system. Can I ask bacula-fd somehow to use more reso