Re: [Bacula-users] What new feature are you waiting for?

2008-11-04 Thread Flavio Junior
Hi ;) .. I think would be nice support for LTO-4 Libraries... I'd bought a TS3100 LTO-4 Library and need to use TSM with it :( I'll really prefer to use bacula instead. PS: I have no idea about problems to make it works (licensing, hardware, proprietary issues) sorry :) -- Flávio do Carmo

Re: [Bacula-users] slightly annoying bug in the console

2008-02-04 Thread Flavio Junior
Well... a workaround that i use with it is, instead of backspace I use shift+backspace .. This also works when console unrecognize backspace and put a ^] at screen... But, I thought it isnt a bacula bug, just a miss config at your terminal (termcap/terminfo, term environment... ) Hope could be u

[Bacula-users] [OFF-TOPIC]: LTO-4 Backwards compatability

2008-01-31 Thread Flavio Junior
Hi folks... Someone there can help me with that doubt.. Is LTO-4 backward compatability with LTO-2 and LTO-1 ? I'm buying a LTO-4 TS3100 Library, but at this time i'm not needing all tape capacity. So, I was thinking to use it with my old LTO-2 tapes for read/write ... Is it possible ? Thanks a

Re: [Bacula-users] Bacula, Tape and Spool

2007-11-23 Thread Flavio Junior
Thanks John :) Mainly to you remember about my problem and suggest me something .. I'll try it, and post results here in sequence... Can I use "time" to mensure copy time ? # time dd if=/dev/sda of=/dev/nst0 bs=1M count=128 -- Flávio do Carmo Júnior On Nov 23, 2007 4:27 PM, John Drescher <[

[Bacula-users] Bacula, Tape and Spool

2007-11-23 Thread Flavio Junior
Hi there.. Folks, I'm using Spool directory now expecting to minimize my problem with LTO1 slow recording (see other thread :). I'd configure spool size to 100G and hope that: - When bacula fill the tape, I'll have 100G to spool data and just record them when provide a new tape. But wasnt what

Re: [Bacula-users] LTO-1 slow recording...

2007-11-21 Thread Flavio Junior
Ralf Gross <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Flavio Junior schrieb: > > Thanks Ralf.. > > This is exactly what happen.. > > > > Worst problem is that all my jobs reach 200G/day, and this is a big > > problem because i'm not at work 24hs/day to keep changing

Re: [Bacula-users] LTO-1 slow recording...

2007-11-21 Thread Flavio Junior
is normal. Spool Directory is local and data (source of backup) is local too. All job is between disk and tape. My Spool size is 100Gb. Thanks. -- Flávio do Carmo Júnior On Nov 21, 2007 12:27 PM, John Drescher <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Nov 21, 2007 9:16 AM, Flavio Junior <[E

Re: [Bacula-users] LTO-1 slow recording...

2007-11-21 Thread Flavio Junior
Thanks Ralf.. This is exactly what happen.. Worst problem is that all my jobs reach 200G/day, and this is a big problem because i'm not at work 24hs/day to keep changing tapes, and backup is accumulating :/ Still worst when I need to recover something and bacula is recording tape all day... :/

[Bacula-users] LTO-1 slow recording...

2007-11-21 Thread Flavio Junior
Good morning folks... This is my first e-mail to the list, I'm brazilian so, sorry for my english :) My problem is follow: I have a dedicated backup server using bacula with disk and LTO-1 storages. When I was using tar/star unix commands to record the tape I was getting a transfer rate near of