Re: [Bacula-users] verify error with LTO hardware encryption SOLVED

2015-12-23 Thread Mark D. Strohm
Hello Kern- Thanks for the reply. Something like that may be at the root of the problem, but the drive does not report being in SysV mode. It shows only these options set: buffer-writes, async-writes, read-ahead, can-bsr and scsi2logical. The Tape Testing Tools and their debug modes were

Re: [Bacula-users] verify error with LTO hardware encryption SOLVED

2015-12-21 Thread Mark D. Strohm
Just to follow up, I did find a workaround for the I/O errors with LTO hardware encryption: At the end of a tape file, space a record forward, then a record back (code below). I have not found the actual cause of the problem. It is most likely with the vendor firmware for that particular IBM

Re: [Bacula-users] verify error with LTO hardware encryption

2015-10-20 Thread Mark D. Strohm
Hello Patti and Martin- Thank you for the replies. As I understand it, Bacula should have no problem with LTO hardware encryption because (once set) it is supposed to be transparent at the user level, the same as hardware compression. But apparently it is not perfectly transparent. I’m

[Bacula-users] verify error with LTO hardware encryption

2015-10-19 Thread Mark D. Strohm
Hello- Is there a trick to using Bacula with LTO hardware encryption enabled? With drive encryption turned on, verify jobs are hitting an I/O error reading the first record of a tape file. On a test job that went to files 78, 79 and 80, the error looks like this: 19-Oct 14:03 ccnback-sd JobId