[Bacula-users] **Long Post** Bacula doesn't seem to recognize my schedule

2005-08-23 Thread Robert W Hartzell
Greetings all, I have been working on this for a few days but can't seem to get it right. Bacula seems to ignore my schedule and wants to run my jobs every night instead of the Full job once a month and the differential job every 2nd-5th Sunday. I ran a full job after setting up bacula but all

[Bacula-users] I need advice on permanent setup.

2005-09-25 Thread Robert W Hartzell
I have setup and tested bacula 1.36.3 on my home office network for about two months now and everything works great. Backup and restores are humming along just fine. Now I would like to set up a permanent configuration. I have a few questions for you experts out there if you don't mind. My setup i

Re: [Bacula-users] I need advice on permanent setup.

2005-09-29 Thread Robert W Hartzell
On Mon, 2005-09-26 at 06:05, Phil Stracchino wrote: > Robert W Hartzell wrote: > > I want to retain Full backups 6 months but I'm not sure how long I need > > to save Differential and Incremental backups. > > > > Should I use different pools for each machine or

[Bacula-users] Solaris rescue cd project

2006-04-20 Thread Robert W Hartzell
I have a project that I have been working on in my spare time that may be of interest to some on this list. I have successively built a custom Solaris install CD that consists of the boot image, install routine and statically compiled file daemon with about 400MB of free space. During testing I

Re: [Bacula-users] Solaris rescue cd project

2006-04-20 Thread Robert W Hartzell
On Thu, 2006-04-20 at 12:24, Ryan Novosielski wrote: > -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- > Hash: SHA1 > > Robert W Hartzell wrote: > > Is this project of interest to any one? Any thoughts or comments? > > Robert, > > Though the thread might not be one that yo

[Bacula-users] Solaris Bare Metal Recovery: SUCCESS!

2006-04-23 Thread Robert W Hartzell
I'm very pleased to report that I have just completed a 100% successful bare metal restore on Solaris 10_01/06 x86 using my custom boot CD. I wanted to also point out that the restore CD is based on Solaris 10_03/05 boot code but it restored the GRUB boot code without a hitch. More details to f

Re: [Bacula-users] Version error for database "bacula". Wanted 8, got 9

2006-05-16 Thread Robert W Hartzell
Maik Derstappen wrote: hello, im upgrading my bacula from 1.36.2 to 1.38.9 on my debian machine. But i have the following error: Version error for database "bacula". Wanted 8, got 9 The Database was new created befor. can anyone help me pleas? cu maik You probably need to update your datab

Re: [Bacula-users] Solaris static-fd

2006-05-19 Thread Robert W Hartzell
Ryan Novosielski wrote: -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Is there still no way to build a static fd on Solaris? I need this for a rescue disc for Solaris 9. I know Robert Hartzell has done it with 10 -- don't know if something changed between 9 and 10. Any info from anyone? Here's

Re: [Bacula-users] running 1.38.9 on FreeBSD 6.0

2006-05-23 Thread Robert W Hartzell
Artem Kulakov wrote: I am having a problems starting bacula director version 1.38.9 on a FreeBSD 6.0 machine. I get "Could not open state file" error. I modified the code to include the path to the state file in the error message and it seems to be correct, at least it points to the correct fol

[Bacula-users] Problem with the list???

2006-05-23 Thread Robert W Hartzell
Has anyone else noticed a problem with delivery of the list messages? I seem to be getting messages today that are 4 or 5 days old and 2 messages that I sent never showed up on the list. -- Robert --- All the advantages of Linux Managed Host

Re: [Bacula-users] Problem with the list???

2006-05-23 Thread Robert W Hartzell
Ryan Novosielski wrote: I have noticed a problem, yes. I get my own replies considerably later than other messages on the list. Thats the same behavior that i have noticed lately. Thanks for confirming that I'm not the only one. -- Robert --

Re: [Bacula-users] Problem with the list???

2006-05-24 Thread Robert W Hartzell
Russell Howe wrote: Robert W Hartzell wrote, sometime around 23/05/06 22:06: Has anyone else noticed a problem with delivery of the list messages? I seem to be getting messages today that are 4 or 5 days old and 2 messages that I sent never showed up on the list. That'll be me, then.

Re: [Bacula-users] is mysql 5 supported

2006-05-29 Thread Robert W Hartzell
Robin Mordasiewicz wrote: > Is mysql 5 supported for use with bacula ? > I don't think it's supported as in "tested and guaranteed to work" by the developers but I have been using 5.0.xx for several months without problems. You should probably check the release notes and documentation to find

[Bacula-users] DVD media and Solaris

2006-07-05 Thread Robert W Hartzell
Does anyone have a working DVD setup for Solaris? I use cdrecord-ProDVD for normal use but I'm having a hard time finding info on how to configure dvd+rw-tools (which Bacula requires) even though it seems to support Solaris since 2.x. I have about 60GB of static data that I would like to archiv

[Bacula-users] Solaris ZFS filesystem support???

2006-07-16 Thread Robert W Hartzell
I'm in the process of converting my raid 5 disk subsystems to Solaris's new ZFS file system. So the big question for me is, are there any plans for bacula to support this awesome new 128-bit file system? If your interested in ZFS read about it here: http://www.sun.com/2004-0914/feature/ -- Robe

Re: [Bacula-users] Bacula on Solaris 9 errors?

2006-07-27 Thread Robert W Hartzell
John wrote: > Everything works fine on the linux boxes but the solaris boxes are showing > these > errors: > Note: /data is an EMC storage array. > > ava-adbu1a-fd: Filesystem change prohibited. Will not descend into /net > ava-adbu1a-fd: Filesystem change prohibited. Will not descend i

Re: [Bacula-users] Maximum Concurrent Jobs for a device

2006-07-31 Thread Robert W Hartzell
Kern Sibbald wrote: > On Monday 31 July 2006 12:41, Birger Blixt wrote: >> On 2006-07-28 14:34, Kern Sibbald wrote: >> Well, If I start bacula without any tapes loaded, then bacula-sd will loop > for >> about one hour / drive before I can connect to it, so I make sure the drive > has >> tapes b

Re: [Bacula-users] Filesystem change prohibited. why?

2006-08-21 Thread Robert W Hartzell
Martin Simmons wrote: >> On Wed, 16 Aug 2006 11:08:28 +0200, Kern Sibbald said: >> On Wednesday 16 August 2006 00:33, Jo Rhett wrote: On Tuesday 08 August 2006 22:29, Timo Neuvonen wrote: > It's worth noting, that the messages above don't necessarily mean > that the > filesys

Re: [Bacula-users] Filesystem change prohibited. why?

2006-08-22 Thread Robert W Hartzell
Martin Simmons wrote: >>>>>> On Mon, 21 Aug 2006 19:27:18 -0700, Robert W Hartzell said: >>>> I think the simplest and best solution is to suppress these messages as I >>>> wrote above if they are in fact backed up somewhere else in the backup. >>

[Bacula-users] fatal: libmysqlclient_r.so.14: open failed: No such file or directory

2005-10-30 Thread Robert W Hartzell
I have successively compiled 1.36.3 with these configure options: CFLAGS="-g" ./configure \ --sbindir=$HOME/bacula/sbin \ --sysconfdir=$HOME/bacula/bin \ --mandir=$HOME/bacula/man \ --with-mysql=/opt/csw/mysql4 \ --enable-smartalloc \ --with-pid-dir=$HOME/bacula/bin/working \ --with-

[Bacula-users] ld.so.1: bacula-dir: fatal: libmysqlclient_r.so.15: open failed:

2005-11-14 Thread Robert W Hartzell
It's been about two weeks and I still can't get past this error. ns1{rwhartz}: bin/bacula start Starting the Bacula Storage daemon Starting the Bacula File daemon Starting the Bacula Director daemon ld.so.1: bacula-dir: fatal: libmysqlclient_r.so.15: open failed: No such file or directory Killed

Re: [Bacula-users] ld.so.1: bacula-dir: fatal: libmysqlclient_r.so.15: open failed:

2005-11-20 Thread Robert W Hartzell
On Mon, 2005-11-14 at 23:48, David Logan wrote: > Hi Robert, > > It maybe that you have not set either LD_LIBRARY_PATH or used crle to > add the path to the library, to the path where ld ca find it. > > If you have a look at the man page for crle that explains it all pretty > well there > > R

Re: [Bacula-users] Suse 9.3 prof & MySQL 5.x

2005-11-22 Thread Robert W Hartzell
On Tue, 2005-11-22 at 11:26, mail wrote: > Is there any possiblity to connect to the MySql version 5.x database > (bucula-dir is not to be connected ) ? I use mysql-5.0.15 (compiled on Solaris 10 FCS) with no problems so far. Robert. --- This

Re: Re: [Bacula-users] Suse 9.3 prof & MySQL 5.x

2005-11-23 Thread Robert W Hartzell
On Wed, 2005-11-23 at 01:17, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > > > Is there any possiblity to connect to the MySql version 5.x database > > > (bucula-dir is not to be connected ) ? > > > > > I use mysql-5.0.15 (compiled on Solaris 10 FCS) with no problems so far. > > Robert. > > Here are the error-mes

[Bacula-users] Bacula-fd exits with status 208

2006-01-24 Thread Robert W Hartzell
I've created a service manifest for the bacula file daemon on Solaris 10 3/5 but it won't re-spawn the fd because I'm getting an exit status of 208 when killing or stopping the daemon. Anybody know what conditions could give an exit status of 208? I've run with debugging turned on but I'm not seei

Re: [Bacula-users] Bacula-fd exits with status 208

2006-01-25 Thread Robert W Hartzell
On Wed, 2006-01-25 at 06:14, Martin Simmons wrote: > >>>>> On Tue, 24 Jan 2006 23:07:08 -0700, Robert W Hartzell <[EMAIL > >>>>> PROTECTED]> said: > > > > I've created a service manifest for the bacula file daemon on Solaris 10 >

Re: [Bacula-users] Bacula-fd exits with status 208

2006-01-26 Thread Robert W Hartzell
On Wed, 2006-01-25 at 14:47, Martin Simmons wrote: > > Sorry, I don't know how svc interacts with bacula. > What reports 208 and how > do you know that it is definitely the exit status from bacula-fd? # ./bacula-fd stop Stopping the Bacula File daemon: # echo $? 208 > I would use gdb or truss

Re: [Bacula-users] Bacula-fd exits with status 208

2006-01-27 Thread Robert W Hartzell
On Fri, 2006-01-27 at 04:33, Martin Simmons wrote: > >>>>> On Thu, 26 Jan 2006 20:06:02 -0700, Robert W Hartzell <[EMAIL > >>>>> PROTECTED]> said: > > > > Here's the tail end of the output of truss -p PID after executing &

Re: [Bacula-users] Bacula-fd exits with status 208

2006-02-02 Thread Robert W Hartzell
On Fri, 2006-01-27 at 09:10, Ryan Novosielski wrote: > As an aside, I would really appreciate you releasing your manifest file > to the list when it is finished (or even now -- it may actually help > solve the problem). Having written one myself for MySQL I believe it > was, I know what a timesa

[Bacula-users] Re: [Apcupsd-users] Re: Solaris usb packages related to apcupsd

2006-03-08 Thread Robert W Hartzell
On Wed, 2006-03-08 at 16:14, Adam Kropelin wrote: > (Please send apcupsd related mail to the apcupsd-users list rather than, > or in addition to, me personally. That way others can benefit from the > discussion and offer suggestions of their own.) > > Rolf wrote: > > hello > > > > I noted on the

Re: [Bacula-users] File Daemon Script?

2006-03-09 Thread Robert W Hartzell
On Thu, 2006-03-09 at 18:09, mpapet wrote: > Hi, > > I'd like to run a script on a client. (bacula-fd.conf) In this case, it's a > windows client and I'm trying to close outlook before backing up the pst. > > FYI, bacula complains about the pst being locked by another process if > Outlook is open

Re: [Bacula-users] MySQL keepalive?

2006-03-31 Thread Robert W Hartzell
On Fri, 2006-03-31 at 02:10, Heinz Ulrich Stille wrote: > Hi! > > I ran into the "MySQL server has gone away" Problem. Looks like the > culprit is mysqld's inactivity timeout. In the list archives I found > a message that the problem went away after upgrading all bacula > components to mysql 4.1.

Re: [Bacula-users] Unable to support Solaris

2006-04-16 Thread Robert W Hartzell
On Thu, 2006-04-13 at 13:50, Kern Sibbald wrote: > Hello, > > I do not feel that I can adequately support Solaris any longer so will very > likely drop it from the officially supported platforms. > > Why? > Because I don't have access to a tape drive for Solaris, and I no longer have > the ti

Re: [Bacula-users] Problem with accurate backups

2009-06-14 Thread Robert W Hartzell
Falk Sauer wrote: > Hi Bob, > > On Sonntag 14 Juni 2009 23:35:43 wrote: >> I have installed both 3.0.0 & 3.0.1 on a test sever using the same >> configuration and hardware as my production serer. Everything >> works as expected until I enable accurate backups. I can run a >> level full backup whic

Re: [Bacula-users] Problem with accurate backups

2009-06-14 Thread Robert W Hartzell
Falk Sauer wrote: > Hi Robert, > > On Montag 15 Juni 2009 06:13:21 wrote: >> Falk Sauer wrote: >>> Hi Bob, >>> >>> On Sonntag 14 Juni 2009 23:35:43 wrote: I have installed both 3.0.0 & 3.0.1 on a test sever using the same configuration and hardware as my production serer. Everything

Re: [Bacula-users] Problem with accurate backups

2009-06-15 Thread Robert W Hartzell
Falk Sauer wrote: > Hi Robert, > > On Montag 15 Juni 2009 08:54:33 wrote: >> Ok i can confirm that th query does fail when entered manualy into >> mysql >> >> building directory tree for JobId(s) 1 ... Query failed: SELECT >> Path.Path, Filename.Name, File.FileIndex, File.JobId, File.LStat >> FRO

Re: [Bacula-users] Problem with accurate backups

2009-06-15 Thread Robert W Hartzell
Andrea Conti wrote: >> I'm using MySQL 4.0.31. > > MySQL 4.0 does not support subqueries, you need at least 4.1. > > andrea > Are these subqueries something that's newly added when accurate backups were implemented? The reason I ask is because I have always used the version of mysql that ship

Re: [Bacula-users] Problem with accurate backups

2009-06-15 Thread Robert W Hartzell
Fahrer, Julian wrote: > Hi, > > Not what you asked, But you could also use postgres as database i you > don't want to install a newer mysql version in your box. It also ships > with solaris. > > Kind regards > Mit freundlichem Gruß > > Julian Fahrer > Thanks for the suggestion and i have be