Hello Eric,
Great job!
wt., 30 sie 2022 o 09:30 Eric Bollengier via Bacula-devel <
bacula-de...@lists.sourceforge.net> napisał(a):
>
> 2. Bacula Binaries
> 3. Windows Binaries
> 4. macOS Binaries
>
>
Just a sake of curiosity, in terms of Bacula Community migration to GitLab
- do you plan to
Hello Wanderlei,
There's nothing to worry about the Debian repository you've mentioned
If you you compare with a "standard" Debian repo, the major difference is
that Bacula version and your personal "key" has been added to the url.
Nothing much more.
Debian Stretch repository
Hello Kern
Can you take a look in the debian repo.
It looks that the debian directory are "duplicated" (too many folders
comparing with centos repository)
Debian:
http://bacula.org/packages/X/debs/9.0.8/stretch/amd64/dists/stretch/main/binary-amd64/
CentOS
On 10/29/2014 02:02 PM, Pasi Kärkkäinen wrote:
On Wed, Oct 15, 2014 at 12:49:33PM +0200, Kern Sibbald wrote:
Hello,
On 14-10-13 09:38 PM, Pasi Kärkkäinen wrote:
On Fri, Sep 05, 2014 at 11:23:31PM +0200, Kern Sibbald wrote:
Hello,
Hello,
I have posted a Bacula Status report to the
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 10/29/2014 06:41 PM, Dan Langille wrote:
On Oct 29, 2014, at 9:02 AM, Pasi Kärkkäinen pa...@iki.fi wrote:
On Wed, Oct 15, 2014 at 12:49:33PM +0200, Kern Sibbald wrote:
Hello,
On 14-10-13 09:38 PM, Pasi Kärkkäinen wrote:
On Fri, Sep 05,
On Wed, Oct 15, 2014 at 12:49:33PM +0200, Kern Sibbald wrote:
Hello,
On 14-10-13 09:38 PM, Pasi Kärkkäinen wrote:
On Fri, Sep 05, 2014 at 11:23:31PM +0200, Kern Sibbald wrote:
Hello,
Hello,
I have posted a Bacula Status report to the www.bacula.org site.
It discusses the following
On Oct 29, 2014, at 9:02 AM, Pasi Kärkkäinen pa...@iki.fi wrote:
On Wed, Oct 15, 2014 at 12:49:33PM +0200, Kern Sibbald wrote:
Hello,
On 14-10-13 09:38 PM, Pasi Kärkkäinen wrote:
On Fri, Sep 05, 2014 at 11:23:31PM +0200, Kern Sibbald wrote:
Hello,
Hello,
I have posted a Bacula
Hello,
On 14-10-13 09:38 PM, Pasi Kärkkäinen wrote:
On Fri, Sep 05, 2014 at 11:23:31PM +0200, Kern Sibbald wrote:
Hello,
Hello,
I have posted a Bacula Status report to the www.bacula.org site.
It discusses the following items:
1. Bacula Release Status
2. Windows Binaries
Hmm.. so
On Fri, Sep 05, 2014 at 11:23:31PM +0200, Kern Sibbald wrote:
Hello,
Hello,
I have posted a Bacula Status report to the www.bacula.org site.
It discusses the following items:
1. Bacula Release Status
2. Windows Binaries
Hmm.. so there are no community windows binaries anymore?
On Thu, Oct 27, 2011 at 4:07 PM, Phil Stracchino ala...@metrocast.net wrote:
On 10/27/11 15:44, Kern Sibbald wrote:
Looks like the DB upgrade scripts for 5.2.0 can upgrade the DB from
v5.0, but not from v5.1. I have a v13 database. I'm patching the DB
manually right now, but this may leave
On 10/30/11 12:59, John Drescher wrote:
On Thu, Oct 27, 2011 at 4:07 PM, Phil Stracchino ala...@metrocast.net wrote:
I just compared what the script was doing to the existing schema and
made the necessary changes by hand. Wasn't a problem, and nothing
non-obvious showed up.
So you did not
On Sun, Oct 30, 2011 at 4:14 PM, Phil Stracchino ala...@metrocast.net wrote:
On 10/30/11 12:59, John Drescher wrote:
On Thu, Oct 27, 2011 at 4:07 PM, Phil Stracchino ala...@metrocast.net
wrote:
I just compared what the script was doing to the existing schema and
made the necessary changes by
On Fri, Jul 23, 2010 at 05:54:03PM +0200, Kern Sibbald wrote:
2. New release cycle:
The little code we currently have for the next major release is in the SF
bacula git repository under Branch-5.1.
We are considering to moving to a regular 6 month release cycle. The
advantage
of such
On Tuesday 27 July 2010 12:21:01 Pasi Kärkkäinen wrote:
On Fri, Jul 23, 2010 at 05:54:03PM +0200, Kern Sibbald wrote:
2. New release cycle:
The little code we currently have for the next major release is in the SF
bacula git repository under Branch-5.1.
We are considering to moving to a
*** Thank you for your support of Bacula! ***
The success of Bacula and its ongoing development depend on the vigor of our
community. Your support takes many forms: bug reports and suggestions for new
features, contributions of code and bug fixes, regression testing,
documentation, and
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Dan Langille wrote:
On Oct 2, 2008, at 8:46 PM, Hemant Shah wrote:
There are ReleaseNotes with each release. That is what you should be
reading.
Surely you don't expect someone to scan a 900 page document to find
out of there's something
On Tue, 7 Oct 2008 07:37:36 +0200, Kern Sibbald said:
On Monday 06 October 2008 22:04:39 Martin Simmons wrote:
On Mon, 6 Oct 2008 13:05:49 +0200, Kern Sibbald said:
On Monday 06 October 2008 06:22:51 Troy Daniels wrote:
Hi,
Not sure if this has been discussed elsewhere
On Tue, 7 Oct 2008 00:59:48 +0200, Marc Schiffbauer said:
Mail-Followup-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED],
* Martin Simmons schrieb am 06.10.08 um 22:04 Uhr:
If it hasn't been done already, it could be useful to consider how this
affects the mental model that users have of the include/exclude
* Martin Simmons schrieb am 07.10.08 um 13:00 Uhr:
I voted for putting it into the Exclude section because this
directive is about *excluding* directories from the backup.
True, but...
So if
someone uses this directive it
* Martin Simmons schrieb am 07.10.08 um 13:23 Uhr:
On Tue, 7 Oct 2008 07:37:36 +0200, Kern Sibbald said:
I personally don't find it that confusing, but am willing to admit that
some
would. So, what is the solution?
Drop the feature?
Change the feature?
Putting it
On Monday 06 October 2008 06:22:51 Troy Daniels wrote:
Hi,
Not sure if this has been discussed elsewhere (been offline for a week
or so, so am still catching up on my emails :) )
Yes.
It is not too late to change the name of the directive, but I would like
to see some discussion/input
On Mon, 6 Oct 2008 13:05:49 +0200, Kern Sibbald said:
On Monday 06 October 2008 06:22:51 Troy Daniels wrote:
Hi,
Not sure if this has been discussed elsewhere (been offline for a week
or so, so am still catching up on my emails :) )
Yes.
It is not too late to change the name
* Martin Simmons schrieb am 06.10.08 um 22:04 Uhr:
If it hasn't been done already, it could be useful to consider how this
affects the mental model that users have of the include/exclude algorithm
(which is already a source of some difficulty). This applies to the fstypes
and drivetypes
On Monday 06 October 2008 22:04:39 Martin Simmons wrote:
On Mon, 6 Oct 2008 13:05:49 +0200, Kern Sibbald said:
On Monday 06 October 2008 06:22:51 Troy Daniels wrote:
Hi,
Not sure if this has been discussed elsewhere (been offline for a week
or so, so am still catching up on my
Hi,
Not sure if this has been discussed elsewhere (been offline for a week
or so, so am still catching up on my emails :) )
It is not too late to change the name of the directive, but I would like to
see some discussion/input on this. Although I don't have any strong
attachment to Ignore
Thanks -- your testing is much appreciated.
Regards,
Kern
Kern Sibbald wrote:
I would appreciate if beta testers would retest the current SVN.
Thanks.
Other than weird-files2 (known glitch due to cp deficiency) it passes
everything fine on Mac OS 10.4. Also passes everything on my
On Thursday 19 April 2007 17:55, Ryan Novosielski wrote:
Kern Sibbald wrote:
As an example of what I am lamenting here is that there is a Win 2003 bug
open
since 20 March where restore of encrypted (and compressed if I remember
right) data fails. Another example is that despite my
On Thursday 19 April 2007 23:47, Jerry Amundson wrote:
Another thought as I read back through...
On 4/19/07, Kern Sibbald [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
[snip]
My solution to this problem is several fold:
1. As of release 2.2.0, Win32, Solaris, and FreeBSD will no longer
be officially
On Thursday 19 April 2007 23:26, Robert Nelson wrote:
Comments inline below
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:bacula-devel-
[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Kern Sibbald
Sent: Thursday, April 19, 2007 3:10 AM
To: bacula-devel; bacula-users
Cc: Shane Coughlan
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:bacula-devel-
[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Kern Sibbald
Sent: Friday, April 20, 2007 2:37 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Cc: Robert Nelson; 'Shane Coughlan'; 'bacula-users'
Subject: Re: [Bacula-devel] Bacula Status -- change of
On Thursday 19 April 2007 23:14, Arno Lehmann wrote:
Hi, again,
On 4/19/2007 12:10 PM, Kern Sibbald wrote:
...
4. I am no longer personally going to maintain the projects list (Feature
Requests). If someone wants to pick up maintaining it including the
voting,
I would be very happy.
Comments inline below
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:bacula-devel-
[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Kern Sibbald
Sent: Thursday, April 19, 2007 3:10 AM
To: bacula-devel; bacula-users
Cc: Shane Coughlan
Subject: [Bacula-devel] Bacula Status -- change of direction
Hello Landon,
On Monday 04 December 2006 05:22, Landon Fuller wrote:
On Dec 3, 2006, at 12:06 PM, Kern Sibbald wrote:
These two issues appear to be due to some bugs in Robert Nelson's new
blocking encryption restore code. I'm going to spend today fixing
remaining issues there.
On Dec 3, 2006, at 7:26 AM, Kern Sibbald wrote:
I'm still targeting it before the end of the year, but it looks
like one major
new feature will not be enabled, and that is data encryption. The
code just
is not stable (it doesn't pass a simple regression test), and it
affects the
Volume
On Dec 3, 2006, at 7:26 AM, Kern Sibbald wrote:
Volume data format, and it has known bugs (digest problems), which
means that
if any fixes involve changing the data format (as one does that I
found this
morning)
If you're referring to digesting/signing sparse blocks (the change
you
On Sunday 03 December 2006 19:46, Landon Fuller wrote:
On Dec 3, 2006, at 7:26 AM, Kern Sibbald wrote:
I'm still targeting it before the end of the year, but it looks
like one major
new feature will not be enabled, and that is data encryption. The
code just
is not stable (it
On Sunday 03 December 2006 20:23, Landon Fuller wrote:
On Dec 3, 2006, at 7:26 AM, Kern Sibbald wrote:
Volume data format, and it has known bugs (digest problems), which
means that
if any fixes involve changing the data format (as one does that I
found this
morning)
If you're
On Sunday 03 December 2006 19:46, Landon Fuller wrote:
On Dec 3, 2006, at 7:26 AM, Kern Sibbald wrote:
I'm still targeting it before the end of the year, but it looks
like one major
new feature will not be enabled, and that is data encryption. The
code just
is not stable (it
On Dec 3, 2006, at 11:41 AM, Kern Sibbald wrote:
On Sunday 03 December 2006 19:46, Landon Fuller wrote:
It would be negligent of me if this feature isn't ready for release;
what are the remaining blockers that you are concerned about?
Well, for example, the digest/signature routines were
On Sunday 03 December 2006 20:57, Landon Fuller wrote:
On Dec 3, 2006, at 11:41 AM, Kern Sibbald wrote:
On Sunday 03 December 2006 19:46, Landon Fuller wrote:
It would be negligent of me if this feature isn't ready for release;
what are the remaining blockers that you are concerned
On 3 Dec 2006 at 16:26, Kern Sibbald wrote:
Hello,
As most of you know Bacula release version 1.40 is nearing -- it was
originally scheduled for mid-November but delayed due to my vacation and
several bugs.
I'm still targeting it before the end of the year, but it looks like one
On Dec 3, 2006, at 12:06 PM, Kern Sibbald wrote:
On Sunday 03 December 2006 20:57, Landon Fuller wrote:
On Dec 3, 2006, at 11:41 AM, Kern Sibbald wrote:
On Sunday 03 December 2006 19:46, Landon Fuller wrote:
Signature validation is done on what is actually written to disk
(upon restore).
On Dec 3, 2006, at 12:06 PM, Kern Sibbald wrote:
These two issues appear to be due to some bugs in Robert Nelson's new
blocking encryption restore code. I'm going to spend today fixing
remaining issues there.
OK, thanks.
I've committed rewrite of the block-preserving encryption
On Monday 04 December 2006 05:22, Landon Fuller wrote:
On Dec 3, 2006, at 12:06 PM, Kern Sibbald wrote:
These two issues appear to be due to some bugs in Robert Nelson's new
blocking encryption restore code. I'm going to spend today fixing
remaining issues there.
OK, thanks.
Hello,
On Sun, 15 Oct 2006, Kern Sibbald wrote:
1. I have requested help setting up more community participation in testing,
bug fixing, and builds of more platforms such as Solaris, FreeBSD, ... This
is to ensure that all important platforms are supported better than I could
do alone.
I
45 matches
Mail list logo
