> On Fri, 3 Jul 2020 16:00:10 -0600, Greg Woods said:
>
> I am getting this error when running copy jobs. I have an "ARCHIVE-ALL" job
> that searches for any client backup jobs that terminated normally and have
> not yet been copied from online to archive backups, and runs copy jobs for
> each
I am getting this error when running copy jobs. I have an "ARCHIVE-ALL" job
that searches for any client backup jobs that terminated normally and have
not yet been copied from online to archive backups, and runs copy jobs for
each. I have been using this system for 7 years now, and it has worked we
I deleted the volume with VolStatus='Recycle' and then all problems was
solved.
Everything running fine now. Case closed.
/hans
On 09/29/2014 03:51 PM, Hans Schou wrote:
> I still got this problem but maybe there is a clue here
>
> 29-Sep 14:36 bohr-sd JobId 93320: Committing spooled data to Vo
I still got this problem but maybe there is a clue here
29-Sep 14:36 bohr-sd JobId 93320: Committing spooled data to Volume
"san-full3713". Despooling 5,718,460,096 bytes ...
29-Sep 14:37 bohr-sd JobId 93320: End of medium on Volume "san-full3713"
Bytes=5,368,689,055 Blocks=83,221 at 29-Sep-201
Hi
Just for the record.
I can see my database is out of sync with the volume files. I have
"orphan" volume files - like the file is there but not in db or the
information are different. So my first step is to run bscan on all 1500
volumes which may take something around 30 hours.
Case closed
On 2014-09-22 21:19, Heitor Faria wrote:
> Hans,
>
> Everything looks right, but I'm still not sure if your volume
> automatic recycling is working for SanFullPool yet (probably not),
That is the problem - I guess.
> but
> you have another jobs for another pool where recycling is working:
> "Rec
Hans,
Everything looks right, but I'm still not sure if your volume automatic
recycling is working for SanFullPool yet (probably not), but you have
another jobs for another pool where recycling is working: "Recycled volume
"admhuset-1447", "Admhuset". Can we compare both pools configurations?
Reg
Mr. Hans,
> I get this message "Cannot find any appendable volumes" in my file based
> storage.
This is pretty obvious but it's good to make sure: 1. Are you submitting
jobs to the same pool that you have the appendable volumes? 2. Do you have
Appendable volumes in this pool?
> After adding a
Hi
bacula Version: 7.0.4
I get this message "Cannot find any appendable volumes" in my file based
storage. After adding a label and running a job it writes:
22-Sep 14:27 bohr-dir JobId 93031: Begin pruning Jobs older than 6 months .
22-Sep 14:27 bohr-dir JobId 93031: No Jobs found to prune.
22-
On 04/01/2011 14:14, Kleber Leal wrote:
> What pool your jobs are writing?
> You enabled autolabel on File pool. Your jobs are trying write on it?
>
> Verify your config files. By default (no config), the job get JobDefs
> definition and write on Default pool. Your default pool has not
> autolabe
On Tue, Jan 4, 2011 at 9:14 AM, Mister IT Guru wrote:
>
> LabelMedia = yes; appears in all all my device definitions, and the
> storage daemon has been reloaded, restarted, reconfigured, reloaded, and
> restarted again. :)
>
>
Sorry if you've already posted it and I missed it, but what's that
On 04/01/2011 14:27, Paulo Martinez wrote:
> Am 04.01.2011 um 14:23 schrieb Mister IT Guru:
>> On 04/01/2011 02:13, Dan Langille wrote:
>>> On 1/3/2011 4:53 PM, Mister IT Guru wrote:
I am at a loss as to why this can occur, when I've configured
automatic
labellings. I get this error
On 04/01/2011 14:16, Dan Langille wrote:
> On Tue, January 4, 2011 8:23 am, Mister IT Guru wrote:
>> On 04/01/2011 02:13, Dan Langille wrote:
>>> On 1/3/2011 4:53 PM, Mister IT Guru wrote:
I am at a loss as to why this can occur, when I've configured automatic
labellings. I get this error
I had the same message and I had to repair some mysql tables to fix it!
I thought the tables were 'Media' and 'JobMedia'
Kind regards,
Caspar Smit
2011/1/3 Mister IT Guru
> I am at a loss as to why this can occur, when I've configured automatic
> labellings. I get this error emailed to me w
Am 04.01.2011 um 14:23 schrieb Mister IT Guru:
> On 04/01/2011 02:13, Dan Langille wrote:
>> On 1/3/2011 4:53 PM, Mister IT Guru wrote:
>>> I am at a loss as to why this can occur, when I've configured
>>> automatic
>>> labellings. I get this error emailed to me when jobs are trying to
>>> run
On Tue, January 4, 2011 8:23 am, Mister IT Guru wrote:
> On 04/01/2011 02:13, Dan Langille wrote:
>> On 1/3/2011 4:53 PM, Mister IT Guru wrote:
>>> I am at a loss as to why this can occur, when I've configured automatic
>>> labellings. I get this error emailed to me when jobs are trying to run
>>>
What pool your jobs are writing?
You enabled autolabel on File pool. Your jobs are trying write on it?
Verify your config files. By default (no config), the job get JobDefs
definition and write on Default pool. Your default pool has not autolabeling
enabled. Try change it to File pool overriding c
On 04/01/2011 02:13, Dan Langille wrote:
> On 1/3/2011 4:53 PM, Mister IT Guru wrote:
>> I am at a loss as to why this can occur, when I've configured automatic
>> labellings. I get this error emailed to me when jobs are trying to run
>> Cannot find any appendable volumes
>>
>> It's my understandin
On 1/3/2011 4:53 PM, Mister IT Guru wrote:
> I am at a loss as to why this can occur, when I've configured automatic
> labellings. I get this error emailed to me when jobs are trying to run
> Cannot find any appendable volumes
>
> It's my understanding that this happens when there are no tapes
> av
I am at a loss as to why this can occur, when I've configured automatic
labellings. I get this error emailed to me when jobs are trying to run
Cannot find any appendable volumes
It's my understanding that this happens when there are no tapes
available, but I have disk based storage. Any hints a
> On Tue, 27 Jul 2010 14:45:37 -0700, Maria Mckinley said:
>
> On 7/26/10 12:13 PM, John Drescher wrote:
> >snip<
> >>>
> >>> Did it try to use B002 and fail?
> >>>
> >>> John
> >>
> >> Both B001 and B002 are in the changer. I tried loading each of them
> >> in the drive, and afte
On 7/26/10 12:13 PM, John Drescher wrote:
>snip<
>>>
>>> Did it try to use B002 and fail?
>>>
>>> John
>>
>> Both B001 and B002 are in the changer. I tried loading each of them
>> in the drive, and after each time running the mount command in bacula, but I
>> just keep getting the mess
On 7/26/10 12:13 PM, John Drescher wrote:
> On Mon, Jul 26, 2010 at 3:07 PM, Maria Mckinley wrote:
>> On 7/26/10 11:53 AM, John Drescher wrote:
For some reason, bacula is telling me it can't find any appendable
volumes, even though there are clearly appendable volumes. Why would
>>>
On Mon, Jul 26, 2010 at 3:07 PM, Maria Mckinley wrote:
> On 7/26/10 11:53 AM, John Drescher wrote:
>>>
>>> For some reason, bacula is telling me it can't find any appendable
>>> volumes, even though there are clearly appendable volumes. Why would
>>> this be happening? Any ideas?
>>>
>>> *messages
On 7/26/10 11:53 AM, John Drescher wrote:
>> For some reason, bacula is telling me it can't find any appendable
>> volumes, even though there are clearly appendable volumes. Why would
>> this be happening? Any ideas?
>>
>> *messages
>> 26-Jul 11:08 billie-sd JobId 1700: Job MailBackup.2010-07-25_01
> For some reason, bacula is telling me it can't find any appendable
> volumes, even though there are clearly appendable volumes. Why would
> this be happening? Any ideas?
>
> *messages
> 26-Jul 11:08 billie-sd JobId 1700: Job MailBackup.2010-07-25_01.10.00.28
> waiting. Cannot find any appendable
Hello,
For some reason, bacula is telling me it can't find any appendable
volumes, even though there are clearly appendable volumes. Why would
this be happening? Any ideas?
*messages
26-Jul 11:08 billie-sd JobId 1700: Job MailBackup.2010-07-25_01.10.00.28
waiting. Cannot find any appendable vo
Any help?
I'm unable to resolve this issue.
Every time I have to label media...
Il giorno mer, 16/06/2010 alle 12.16 +0200, Gandalf Corvotempesta ha
scritto:
> Il giorno mer, 16/06/2010 alle 12.10 +0200, Carlo Filippetto ha scritto:
> > Have you create any volume in that pool?
> >
> > Post the Po
Il giorno mer, 16/06/2010 alle 12.10 +0200, Carlo Filippetto ha scritto:
> Have you create any volume in that pool?
>
> Post the Pool definition, and the schedul
Schedule {
Name = "My Schedule"
Run = Full 1st sun at 11:25
Run = Differential 2nd-5th sun at 11:25
Run = Incremental mon-sat a
Have you create any volume in that pool?
Post the Pool definition, and the schedul
CIAO
---
Carlo Filippetto
2010/6/16 Gandalf Corvotempesta :
> Hello,
> i'm new to Bacula and I'm having some trouble.
>
> If i'll manually run a backup from bconsole, that
> backup will be completed correctl
Hello,
i'm new to Bacula and I'm having some trouble.
If i'll manually run a backup from bconsole, that
backup will be completed correctly.
But if i'll wait for the scheduled backup, that backup
will abort with the following error:
Cannot find any appendable volumes.
Please use the "label" comm
I've changed my configuration to add a 'Maximum Volumes =' directive for the
pools, and have cancelled jobs, and restarted Bacula.
Some of the volumes are in the loader, and some have been removed for storage.
The Maximum Volumes directive is equal to the total volumes assigned to the
pool (
Thanks, I'll try that.
Peter
On 04/23/2010 10:27 AM, Phil Stracchino wrote:
> On 04/23/10 10:05, Peter Reilly wrote:
>
>> Hello,
>>
>> I'm trying to understand what condition would cause bacula to not find
>> any appendable volumes, or recycle any tapes.
>>
>> *ver
>> orlbacula-dir Version: 2
On 04/23/10 10:05, Peter Reilly wrote:
> Hello,
>
> I'm trying to understand what condition would cause bacula to not find
> any appendable volumes, or recycle any tapes.
>
> *ver
> orlbacula-dir Version: 2.4.2 (26 July 2008) i686-redhat-linux-gnu redhat
>
> I'm getting this error:
>
> 23-Apr 0
Hello,
I'm trying to understand what condition would cause bacula to not find
any appendable volumes, or recycle any tapes.
*ver
orlbacula-dir Version: 2.4.2 (26 July 2008) i686-redhat-linux-gnu redhat
I'm getting this error:
23-Apr 07:30 orlbacula-sd JobId 14636: Job
ons-nids-daily.2010-04
On Mon, Feb 15, 2010 at 11:55:35AM +0100, Daniel Kamm wrote:
> Hi Tino
>
>
> Am 2/15/10 11:10 AM, schrieb Tino Schwarze:
>
> > And even though there are volumes in the scratch pool, e.g.:
> > Pool: Scratch
> > +-++---+-+-+--+---
Hi Tino
Am 2/15/10 11:10 AM, schrieb Tino Schwarze:
> And even though there are volumes in the scratch pool, e.g.:
> Pool: Scratch
> +-++---+-+-+--+--+-+--+---+---+-+
> | media
Hi there,
I've been struggling for weeks to get my previously working setup
working again. :-( I read the docs multiple times but was unable to spot
my fault.
I've got the following setup:
Pool {
Name = Weekly
Pool Type = Backup
# volumes are moved to Scratch manually, avoid automatic recy
In my opinion, it looks correct
mine is there with more information and it work fine
Pool {
Name = Weekly
Pool Type = Backup
Recycle = yes
AutoPrune = yes
VolumeRetention = 31d # recycle in 31 days (default)
Maximum Volumes = 28
Purge Oldest Volume = yes
Recycle Oldest Volume = y
Hi!
Thanks for your answer.
Here is the config for this pool:
Pool {
Name = xxx_daily
Pool Type = Backup
Recycle = yes # Bacula can automatically recycle
Volumes
AutoPrune = yes # Prune expired volumes
Volume Retention = 27 days
Volume Use Du
Juergen,
I'm not really expert on Volume managing (i'm new on bacula's
world :-$), but it might have some relations about the messages you're
getting about volume purging and recycling time. You should check you
retention periods for volumes, for example.
I'm sure it would be very helpful for any
Hi!
We have a problem with Bacula 3.0.2 (Update from 2.x).
Some backups starts normally. Bacula purged and recycled the inserted
tape. Suddenly Bacula says "Can not find any appendable volumes. Please
use the "label" command to create a new volume for ...".
Exactly one hour later, then Bacula
|
+-+-+---+-+---+-
-+--+-+--+---+---+--
---+
Regards
Manfred
-Original Message-
From: John Drescher [mailto:dresche...@gmail.com]
Sent: Monday, February 09, 2009 2:13 PM
To: KNOPS Manfred; bacula-users
Subject: Re: [Bacula-users] Cannot find any appendable volumes.
On Mon, Feb 9, 2009 at 7:51 AM
On Mon, Feb 9, 2009 at 7:51 AM, KNOPS Manfred wrote:
> Hello together,
>
>
>
> I hope someone can help me.
>
> Last Saturday bacula should make fullbackup for 22 clients.
>
> It starts at 20:05 with the first client.
> helios-Pool
> At Sunday morning 04:04 it send me messages like this:
>
> 08-Feb
Hello together,
I hope someone can help me.
Last Saturday bacula should make fullbackup for 22 clients.
It starts at 20:05 with the first client.
At Sunday morning 04:04 it send me messages like this:
08-Feb 04:04 backupserver-sd JobId 232: Job
helios-Automatic-Backup.2009-02-07_20.05.21 wa
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Dan Langille wrote:
> SZÉKELYI Szabolcs wrote:
>> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
>> Hash: SHA1
>>
>> John Drescher wrote:
>>> On Fri, Nov 28, 2008 at 3:38 PM, SZÉKELYI Szabolcs <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>>> wrote:
I use files to store my backups, an
SZÉKELYI Szabolcs wrote:
> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> Hash: SHA1
>
> John Drescher wrote:
>> On Fri, Nov 28, 2008 at 3:38 PM, SZÉKELYI Szabolcs <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>>> I use files to store my backups, and all scheduled backups ran fine when
>>> I got the error 'Cannot find any app
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
John Drescher wrote:
> On Fri, Nov 28, 2008 at 3:38 PM, SZÉKELYI Szabolcs <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> I use files to store my backups, and all scheduled backups ran fine when
>> I got the error 'Cannot find any appendable volumes' out of the blue.
>>
On Fri, Nov 28, 2008 at 3:38 PM, SZÉKELYI Szabolcs <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> Hash: SHA1
>
> Hi,
>
> I use files to store my backups, and all scheduled backups ran fine when
> I got the error 'Cannot find any appendable volumes' out of the blue.
> The filesyst
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hi,
I use files to store my backups, and all scheduled backups ran fine when
I got the error 'Cannot find any appendable volumes' out of the blue.
The filesystem that holds the backup file is not even close to full. The
file that was used previously i
As Mingus Dew wrote:
> When I have this issue I do the following.
>
> 1. Make sure that the request for an "appendable volume" isn't legitimate.
> It happens, tapes fill up and no more are available in the changer.
> 2. Cancel any tape jobs. Let any disk jobs complete
> 3. Stop bacula-dir, bacula
When I have this issue I do the following.
1. Make sure that the request for an "appendable volume" isn't legitimate.
It happens, tapes fill up and no more are available in the changer.
2. Cancel any tape jobs. Let any disk jobs complete
3. Stop bacula-dir, bacula-sd
4. Remove bacula-dir.state, ba
As Mingus Dew wrote:
> I hope someone answers your question. I've seen this same issue reported my
> me and others with no admission that there is a bug. I personally can't find
> anything wrong with my configuration. Could you check your bacula.log for
> any errors in the tape jobs prior. I've no
I hope someone answers your question. I've seen this same issue reported my
me and others with no admission that there is a bug. I personally can't find
anything wrong with my configuration. Could you check your bacula.log for
any errors in the tape jobs prior. I've noticed that library error (mtx
I see there's another message with that subject already. My problem's
a little different: the appendable volume /is/ there, but Bacula
refuses to use it. The drive is BLOCKED, and I don't know how to make
it proceed. I eventually gave up, and killed the job so the other
outstanding jobs could at
Hi all,
I'm running Bacula 2.4.2 off a FreeBSD 7.0 server using a DDS-3 tape drive.
I'm using a Grandfather/father/son tape rotational scheme where I back up
the data and the catalog as two nightly jobs onto a tape each time that it
runs. All is well. Except for the monthly full backup. It will s
> On Fri, 22 Jun 2007 08:58:43 +0200, Wolfgang Powisch (privat) said:
>
> Am 22.06.2007 00:05, Martin Simmons schrieb:
> >> On Thu, 21 Jun 2007 09:33:27 +0200, Wolfgang Powisch (privat) said:
> >> Hello,
> >>
> >> My setup is as follows:
> >>
> >> - Bacula 1.38.0
> >> - One large Pool with
Am 22.06.2007 00:05, Martin Simmons schrieb:
>> On Thu, 21 Jun 2007 09:33:27 +0200, Wolfgang Powisch (privat) said:
>> Hello,
>>
>> My setup is as follows:
>>
>> - Bacula 1.38.0
>> - One large Pool with 1125 on-Disk Volumes (each 2GB)
>> - about 14 Clients
>> - Schedule: weekly full, daily incr
> On Thu, 21 Jun 2007 09:33:27 +0200, Wolfgang Powisch (privat) said:
>
> Hello,
>
> My setup is as follows:
>
> - Bacula 1.38.0
> - One large Pool with 1125 on-Disk Volumes (each 2GB)
> - about 14 Clients
> - Schedule: weekly full, daily incremental
> - Job-Retention: between 1 and 8 weeks,
Hello,
My setup is as follows:
- Bacula 1.38.0
- One large Pool with 1125 on-Disk Volumes (each 2GB)
- about 14 Clients
- Schedule: weekly full, daily incremental
- Job-Retention: between 1 and 8 weeks, depending on client
- Volume retention 2 month
My Problem:
After some time all Volume get sta
Arno Lehmann wrote:
> On 1/12/2007 3:13 PM, Oliver Lehmann wrote:
> >
> > VolRetention: 1,296,000
>
> That's 15 days.
> [...]
> Use the bconsole 'update volume' command.
This worked, thanks! :)
--
Oliver Lehmann
http://www.pofo.de/
http://wishlist.ans-netz.de/
--
Hi,
On 1/12/2007 3:13 PM, Oliver Lehmann wrote:
> Arno Lehmann wrote:
>
>
>>On 1/12/2007 6:41 AM, Oliver Lehmann wrote:
>
>
>>>Why are volumes older 6 days not being reused?
>
Simple answer (but I wanted you to check first :-)
The volumes are not eligible for pruning.
>>What does llist for
Arno Lehmann wrote:
> On 1/12/2007 6:41 AM, Oliver Lehmann wrote:
> > Why are volumes older 6 days not being reused?
> What does llist for one of the volumes you expect to be recycled give?
for example this one - why is it "used"?
Pool: Inc-Pool
MediaId: 2
VolumeName: Inc-000
Hello,
On 1/12/2007 6:41 AM, Oliver Lehmann wrote:
> Hi,
>
> the backups this night where not successfull because of:
>
> 12-Jan 01:05 nudel-sd: Job client-fiori-files.2007-01-12_01.05.01 waiting.
> Cannot find any appendable volumes.
> Please use the "label" command to create a new Volume for
Hi,
the backups this night where not successfull because of:
12-Jan 01:05 nudel-sd: Job client-fiori-files.2007-01-12_01.05.01 waiting.
Cannot find any appendable volumes.
Please use the "label" command to create a new Volume for:
Storage: "FileStorage" (/mnt/files/.bacula)
Media t
hello,
i have a problem with bacula autolabeling.
I think my pool is configured to automatic label a new volume if needed.
But i become the following error messages.
>Cannot find any appendable volumes.
>Please use the "label" command to create a new Volume for:
>
in other Message i see this:
>
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Kern Sibbald wrote:
> On Monday 21 November 2005 22:46, Cedric Charest wrote:
>
>>Cool, thanks a lot!
>>It fixed my problem!
>
>
> Thanks for the confirmation. By the way, did you apply the whole patch or
> just the single file?
I applied the fu
On Monday 21 November 2005 22:46, Cedric Charest wrote:
> Cool, thanks a lot!
> It fixed my problem!
Thanks for the confirmation. By the way, did you apply the whole patch or
just the single file?
>
>
> Cédric Charest
> Administrateur de Systèmes / System Administrator
> Terrascale Technologies
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Cool, thanks a lot!
It fixed my problem!
Cédric Charest
Administrateur de Systèmes / System Administrator
Terrascale Technologies Inc.
Kern Sibbald wrote:
> You ran into a bug in 1.38.x that causes the Director to incorrectly handle
> Pool names c
You ran into a bug in 1.38.x that causes the Director to incorrectly handle
Pool names containing spaces. Bug #492 has a patch file that will add all
current patches to 1.38.1 generating 1.38.2. Note, this patch file is
preliminary because there may be additional changes before the 1.38.2
rel
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Ohh, by the way, I'm using bacula 0.38.1 on a Fedora Core 2 system
(Linux), compiled on the system, with mysql.
Cedric Charest wrote:
> Hello!
>
> I'm trying to configure Bacula for our backups at work with an Exabyte
> Packetloader 1x10 80/160 chang
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hello!
I'm trying to configure Bacula for our backups at work with an Exabyte
Packetloader 1x10 80/160 changer/tape backup.
The changer is supported and everything, but I'm having a weird problem.
Each time I start a job, I get this:
-
72 matches
Mail list logo
