Re: [Bacula-users] 2.2.4 ok to run?

2007-10-26 Thread Janco van der Merwe
Michael, I tried replying to the mail that you sent last night but shortly after we had power failures but in short: We run Bacula 2.2.5 with Postgres 8.1.4 Release 1.1 (The version on the DVD) and had no problems. My colleague seems to think, from the errors that you received, that you require

[Bacula-users] 2.2.4 ok to run?

2007-10-25 Thread Michael Galloway
ok, since i cannot get 2.2.5 to build, i guess i will have to drop back to the 2.2.4 EL5/centOS5 rpms off sourceforge. is 2.2.4 ok to run, or are there outstanding bugs in it? -- michael - This SF.net email is sponsored by:

Re: [Bacula-users] 2.2.4 ok to run?

2007-10-25 Thread Craig White
On Thu, 2007-10-25 at 15:20 -0400, Michael Galloway wrote: ok, since i cannot get 2.2.5 to build, i guess i will have to drop back to the 2.2.4 EL5/centOS5 rpms off sourceforge. is 2.2.4 ok to run, or are there outstanding bugs in it? though the OP has apparently solved, I meant to