Re: [Bacula-users] 9.4.3/9.4.4 problem with full backups

2019-07-01 Thread Phil Stracchino
On 6/3/19 4:38 PM, Phil Stracchino wrote: > On 6/3/19 10:40 AM, Phil Stracchino wrote: >> Any suggestions? Short of rolling back to 9.4.2? > > So, I rolled back to 9.4.2. Smooth tape change, no catatonic SD, no > Director crash, and 9.4.2 wrote 812GB to the tape that 9.4.4 declared > full at 352

Re: [Bacula-users] 9.4.3/9.4.4 problem with full backups

2019-06-17 Thread Phil Stracchino
On 6/17/19 12:15 PM, Kern Sibbald wrote: > Hello Phil, > > I vaguely remember seeing some code a programmer changed that eliminated > the "old" kludge to allow Solaris to run multiple threads.  The comment > I saw was that this was no longer needed on newer Solaris machines.  > Maybe the progra

Re: [Bacula-users] 9.4.3/9.4.4 problem with full backups

2019-06-17 Thread Kern Sibbald
Hello Phil, I vaguely remember seeing some code a programmer changed that eliminated the "old" kludge to allow Solaris to run multiple threads.  The comment I saw was that this was no longer needed on newer Solaris machines.  Maybe the programmer didn't realize that there are still lots of old

Re: [Bacula-users] 9.4.3/9.4.4 problem with full backups

2019-06-03 Thread Phil Stracchino
On 6/3/19 10:40 AM, Phil Stracchino wrote: > Any suggestions? Short of rolling back to 9.4.2? So, I rolled back to 9.4.2. Smooth tape change, no catatonic SD, no Director crash, and 9.4.2 wrote 812GB to the tape that 9.4.4 declared full at 352GB. -- Phil Stracchino Babylon Communications

[Bacula-users] 9.4.3/9.4.4 problem with full backups

2019-06-03 Thread Phil Stracchino
I'm not sure exactly what is causing it, but ... My schedule does nightly incrementals, weekly differentials, and Fulls on the first Monday morning of every month. For the second month in a row - last month with 9.4.3, this month with 9.4.4 - at the first tape volume switch in the monthly full ba