I have rebuilt from source twice and sure enough
certain things are not upgraded such as bcopy.
Regards,
ZK
--- John Drescher [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 3/1/07, Zakai Kinan [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
Indeed, I had the old bacula-dir running. I am
not
sure how that is possible because
On Monday 05 March 2007 06:41, Zakai Kinan wrote:
I have rebuilt from source twice and sure enough
certain things are not upgraded such as bcopy.
I cannot say for sure if you are installing from a package, but
bcopy *is* installed every time you do a make install.
However, if you changed
Hi,
On 3/1/2007 4:45 AM, Zakai Kinan wrote:
This is not the problem I am afraid. Thanks for the
tip.
If that is not the problem you've got a seriously damaged Bacula
installed, I think.
Try running '/path/to/bacula-dir --help' and check the version information.
Arno
ZK
--- John
On 3/1/07, Zakai Kinan [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Indeed, I had the old bacula-dir running. I am not
sure how that is possible because I did a make clean
and a make distclean before doing a configure under
the new source. John was correct as well.
I suspected this as a few times when I have
I am getting the following error after the upgrade:
26-Feb 22:09 bacula-dir: Fatal error: Version error
for database bacula. Want
ed 9, got 10
26-Feb 22:09 bacula-dir: Fatal error: Could not open
database bacula.
26-Feb 22:09 bacula-dir: Fatal
On 2/28/07, Zakai Kinan [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I am getting the following error after the upgrade:
26-Feb 22:09 bacula-dir: Fatal error: Version error
for database bacula. Want
ed 9, got 10
26-Feb 22:09 bacula-dir: Fatal error: Could not open
database bacula.
26-Feb 22:09 bacula-dir:
This is not the problem I am afraid. Thanks for the
tip.
ZK
--- John Drescher [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 2/28/07, Zakai Kinan [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
I am getting the following error after the
upgrade:
26-Feb 22:09 bacula-dir: Fatal error: Version
error
for database bacula.
