On Friday 12 October 2007 12:25, Dan Langille wrote:
> On 12 Oct 2007 at 12:19, Silver Salonen wrote:
>
> > On Friday 12 October 2007 12:13, Dan Langille wrote:
> > > On 12 Oct 2007 at 9:14, Silver Salonen wrote:
> > >
> > > > Hi!
> > > >
> > > > Is there a reason why wx-console should use WX 2.
On 12 Oct 2007 at 12:19, Silver Salonen wrote:
> On Friday 12 October 2007 12:13, Dan Langille wrote:
> > On 12 Oct 2007 at 9:14, Silver Salonen wrote:
> >
> > > Hi!
> > >
> > > Is there a reason why wx-console should use WX 2.4? Every time I
> > > start upgrading bacula-client, I just set "USE_
On Friday 12 October 2007 12:13, Dan Langille wrote:
> On 12 Oct 2007 at 9:14, Silver Salonen wrote:
>
> > Hi!
> >
> > Is there a reason why wx-console should use WX 2.4? Every time I start
> > upgrading bacula-client, I just set "USE_WX=2.8" in bacula-server's
> > Makefile and it builds and work
On 12 Oct 2007 at 9:14, Silver Salonen wrote:
> Hi!
>
> Is there a reason why wx-console should use WX 2.4? Every time I start
> upgrading bacula-client, I just set "USE_WX=2.8" in bacula-server's
> Makefile and it builds and works perfectly. I've also tried compiling
> it with 2.6 and there wasn
Hi!
Is there a reason why wx-console should use WX 2.4? Every time I start
upgrading bacula-client, I just set "USE_WX=2.8" in bacula-server's Makefile
and it builds and works perfectly. I've also tried compiling it with 2.6 and
there wasn't any problem with it neither.
So is the 2.4 really ne
