On May 11, 2007, at 11:19 AM, Justin Lott wrote:
> On May 11, 2007, at 10:56 AM, Jorj Bauer wrote:
>
>>> I think I've figured this out. What clue'd me in was you saying
>>> "in a
>>> simple test without PKI" :-)
>>
>> My test yesterday was without PKI. I was thinking about your setup,
>> not
>>
On May 11, 2007, at 10:56 AM, Jorj Bauer wrote:
>> I think I've figured this out. What clue'd me in was you saying "in a
>> simple test without PKI" :-)
>
> My test yesterday was without PKI. I was thinking about your setup,
> not
> mine. :)
>
> But I didn't have ACL support turned on.
>
> Here'
> I think I've figured this out. What clue'd me in was you saying "in a
> simple test without PKI" :-)
My test yesterday was without PKI. I was thinking about your setup, not
mine. :)
But I didn't have ACL support turned on.
Here's my fileset from yesterday's test, which did back up and restor
On May 11, 2007, at 7:20 AM, Justin Lott wrote:
>
> On May 10, 2007, at 4:21 PM, Jorj Bauer wrote:
>
> That was one of the first things I considered. The Finder itself,
> however, does take RSRC data into account when reporting file
> sizes.
> Anyway, here is the output you were r
On May 10, 2007, at 4:21 PM, Jorj Bauer wrote:
That was one of the first things I considered. The Finder itself,
however, does take RSRC data into account when reporting file
sizes.
Anyway, here is the output you were referring to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]: /System/Librar
> >>That was one of the first things I considered. The Finder itself,
> >>however, does take RSRC data into account when reporting file sizes.
> >>Anyway, here is the output you were referring to:
> >>
> >>[EMAIL PROTECTED]: /System/Library/Fonts # ls -l Times\ LT\ MM/..namedfork/
> >>rsrc
> >>-rw-
> I was wondering if you had gotten a chance to look at this? I was
> going to file a bug report but wanted to check with you first.
Not yet. I've scheduled to look at this (and another HFS+ resource fork
problem) on Thursday.
-- Jorj
pgpREItM3DPAx.pgp
Description: PGP signature
-
On May 4, 2007, at 10:41 AM, Jorj Bauer wrote:
>> That was one of the first things I considered. The Finder itself,
>> however, does take RSRC data into account when reporting file sizes.
>> Anyway, here is the output you were referring to:
>>
>> [EMAIL PROTECTED]: /System/Library/Fonts # ls -l Ti
> On Fri, 04 May 2007 15:50:57 +0200, =?ISO-8859-1?Q?Adam C=E9cile?= said:
>
> Hey,
>
> I have another question, related to this one...
> Can i backup fork ressources on a Windows 2000 server (forks are
> supported by this server) ?
Yes, the Win32 Bacula client takes all NTFS data streams (u
On May 4, 2007, at 10:41 AM, Jorj Bauer wrote:
>> That was one of the first things I considered. The Finder itself,
>> however, does take RSRC data into account when reporting file sizes.
>> Anyway, here is the output you were referring to:
>>
>> [EMAIL PROTECTED]: /System/Library/Fonts # ls -l Ti
> That was one of the first things I considered. The Finder itself,
> however, does take RSRC data into account when reporting file sizes.
> Anyway, here is the output you were referring to:
>
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]: /System/Library/Fonts # ls -l Times\ LT\ MM/..namedfork/
> rsrc
> -rw-r--r--
That was one of the first things I considered. The Finder itself,
however, does take RSRC data into account when reporting file sizes.
Anyway, here is the output you were referring to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]: /System/Library/Fonts # ls -l Times\ LT\ MM/..namedfork/
rsrc
-rw-r--r-- 1 root wheel
Adam,
I would try it out and see if it works. Considering that the RSRC
data must be split/handled somehow to be stored on an NTFS volume in
the first place (via File Services for Macintosh on the Win2K server)
I dont see why it wouldnt work.
- justin
On May 4, 2007, at 9:50 AM, Adam Cécil
> I have another question, related to this one...
> Can i backup fork ressources on a Windows 2000 server (forks are
> supported by this server) ?
They're called alternate data streams under Windows, and are a feature
of the NTFS filesystem (not really the OS). I don't think they're
supported in B
> containing resource forks should work properly with either version of
> bacula that I have tested. What I am seeing however is that these
> files are listed with a size of zero in both bconsole (during setup
> of a restore job, by doing a "dir" during file selection) and also on
> the cli
Hey,
I have another question, related to this one...
Can i backup fork ressources on a Windows 2000 server (forks are
supported by this server) ?
Justin Lott a écrit :
> Hello Everyone,
>
> I've only just joined the ML so forgive me if I missed this issue
> being covered in the list archives at
Hello Everyone,
I've only just joined the ML so forgive me if I missed this issue
being covered in the list archives at gmane.
I am having some trouble backing up and restoring files that contain
resource fork data from HFS+ volumes. I am using bacula-dir and
bacula-sd 2.0.3 on Linux and ba
17 matches
Mail list logo
