[Bacula-users] RE: [Bacula-devel] Bacula project management and feature requests

2005-11-10 Thread David Boyes
Sounds like a great plan. It's probably too late but I suggest changing the acronym from RFC to something else to avoid conflict and possible confusion with RFC = Request for Comment, used extensively to document Internet and other standards. What about RFF = Request for Feature I'd

[Bacula-users] Re: [Bacula-devel] Bacula project management and feature requests

2005-11-09 Thread Karl Cunningham
Hi Kern -- Sounds like a great plan. It's probably too late but I suggest changing the acronym from RFC to something else to avoid conflict and possible confusion with RFC = Request for Comment, used extensively to document Internet and other standards. What about RFF = Request for Feature

[Bacula-users] Re: [Bacula-devel] Bacula project management and feature requests

2005-11-09 Thread Joshua Kugler
On Wednesday 09 November 2005 08:58, Karl Cunningham wrote: Hi Kern -- Sounds like a great plan. It's probably too late but I suggest changing the acronym from RFC to something else to avoid conflict and possible confusion with RFC = Request for Comment, used extensively to document

Re: [Bacula-users] Re: [Bacula-devel] Bacula project management and feature requests

2005-11-09 Thread Kern Sibbald
On Wednesday 09 November 2005 18:58, Karl Cunningham wrote: Hi Kern -- Sounds like a great plan. It's probably too late but I suggest changing the acronym from RFC to something else to avoid conflict and possible confusion with RFC = Request for Comment, used extensively to document