Re: [Bacula-users] Spools less than configured

2005-08-26 Thread Alan Brown
On Thu, 25 Aug 2005, Kern Sibbald wrote: Under 1.37, I have "unified" the naming convention of all Bacula temporary files so that it will be easy to know which ones are used for what (the use is always postfixed -- e.g. .spool, .mail, ...) and it will be easier to do spool/working directory clea

Re: [Bacula-users] Spools less than configured

2005-08-25 Thread Kern Sibbald
On Thursday 25 August 2005 16:52, Alan Brown wrote: > On Thu, 25 Aug 2005, Kern Sibbald wrote: > > Under 1.37, I have "unified" the naming convention of all Bacula > > temporary files so that it will be easy to know which ones are used for > > what (the use is always postfixed -- e.g. .spool, .mail

Re: [Bacula-users] Spools less than configured

2005-08-25 Thread Kern Sibbald
Hello, Maybe the SD crashed or something and there is an old spool file that is in your spool directory that should have been deleted. Under 1.37, I have "unified" the naming convention of all Bacula temporary files so that it will be easy to know which ones are used for what (the use is alway

[Bacula-users] Spools less than configured

2005-08-25 Thread Kristian Ejvind
Hi. In my small home network I use bacula on a Solaris 9 box to back up three computers. Bacula spools data to local disk in 2 GB chunks before writing to tape, and it has been humming along nicely for a year or so. Suddenly, a couple of weeks ago, it started to spool less than configured, only