Re: [Bacula-users] Tape status mismatches cause job fails

2008-02-29 Thread Damian Brasher
Arno Lehmann wrote: Hi, 28.02.2008 12:49, Damian Brasher wrote: Hi List I have had some fairly regular job failures that I have pinpointed to be caused by tape status type error mismatches. The most common is that the tape status does not match that of the catalogue in a number of

Re: [Bacula-users] Tape status mismatches cause job fails

2008-02-29 Thread Damian Brasher
Arno Lehmann wrote: Hi, 28.02.2008 12:49, Damian Brasher wrote: You need to fix the underlying problem. The first step to do so is to run the btape tests and tweak the configuration until they all run without failure. I have seen occasional errors - I have decided to replace my SCSI card

[Bacula-users] Tape status mismatches cause job fails

2008-02-28 Thread Damian Brasher
Hi List I have had some fairly regular job failures that I have pinpointed to be caused by tape status type error mismatches. The most common is that the tape status does not match that of the catalogue in a number of ways. The first is that if the catalogue reports the volume status to be

Re: [Bacula-users] Tape status mismatches cause job fails

2008-02-28 Thread Arno Lehmann
Hi, 28.02.2008 12:49, Damian Brasher wrote: Hi List I have had some fairly regular job failures that I have pinpointed to be caused by tape status type error mismatches. The most common is that the tape status does not match that of the catalogue in a number of ways. The first is that