Phil Stracchino wrote:
> If that's a backup of a single host, that sounds ... bizarre. The only
> explanation I can think of is that there's a directory tree sitting in
> somewhere between those seven files in the directory, that contains a
> vast quantity of data. If you look at your filesyste
On 02/11/10 14:04, Richard Scobie wrote:
> I am just testing bacula prior to deployment and restored 7 files from
> one directory from a backup of 3TB.
>
> This backup is stored on 3 LTO4 volumes and in order to restore these 7
> files, it read from the first and third LTO4 volumes, when I would
> This backup is stored on 3 LTO4 volumes and in order to restore these 7
> files, it read from the first and third LTO4 volumes, when I would have
> expected them to all be adjacent to one another.
>
> Is this a deliberate policy to spread data across tapes or a reflection
> of the FS layout of th
I am just testing bacula prior to deployment and restored 7 files from
one directory from a backup of 3TB.
This backup is stored on 3 LTO4 volumes and in order to restore these 7
files, it read from the first and third LTO4 volumes, when I would have
expected them to all be adjacent to one anot
